CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 12Speech and dialogue systemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

MedDialog: Two Large-scale Medical Dialogue Datasets

Open access
He, Xuehai, Chen, Shu, Ju, Zeqian, Dong, Xiangyu, Fang, Hongchao, Wang, Sicheng, Yang, Yue, Zeng, Jiaqi, Zhang, Ruisi, Zhang, Ruoyu, Zhou, Meng, Zhu, Penghui, Xie, Pengtao·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2004.03329arXiv 2004.03329
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Medical dialogue systems are promising in assisting in telemedicine to increase access to healthcare services, improve the quality of patient care, and reduce medical costs. To facilitate the research and development of medical dialogue systems, we build two large-scale medical dialogue datasets: MedDialog-EN and MedDialog-CN. MedDialog-EN is an English dataset containing 0.3 million conversations between patients and doctors and 0.5 million utterances. MedDialog-CN is an Chinese dataset containing 1.1 million conversations and 4 million utterances. To our best knowledge, MedDialog-(EN,CN) are the largest medical dialogue datasets to date. The dataset is available at https://github.com/UCSD-AI4H/Medical-Dialogue-System

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2004.03329

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MedDialog is a multilingual dataset of doctor-patient conversations, suitable for training and evaluating medical dialogue systems.

    “- MedDialog: A multilingual dataset of doctor-patient conversations, suitable for training and evaluating medical dialogue systems [73].”

    From Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Abstract (p. 1) identifies MedDialog-EN and MedDialog-CN as English and Chinese patient–doctor conversation datasets, and the Introduction (p. 1) describes such conversations as training data for medical dialogue systems. Our copy does not specifically establish their suitability for evaluating those systems. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Reena L Pande and Michael Morris. Leveraging remote behavioral health interventions to improve medical outcomes and reduce costs. Am J Manag Care , 21(2):e000-e000, 2015.
  2. Zhongyu Wei, Qianlong Liu, Baolin Peng, Huaixiao Tou, Ting Chen, Xuan-Jing Huang, Kam-Fai Wong, and Xiang Dai. Task-oriented dialogue system for automatic diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) , pages 201-207, 2018.
  3. Richard Wootton, John Craig, and Victor Patterson. Introduction to telemedicine . CRC Press, 2017.
  4. Lin Xu, Qixian Zhou, Ke Gong, Xiaodan Liang, Jianheng Tang, and Liang Lin. End-to-end knowledge-routed relational dialogue system for automatic diagnosis. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 33, pages 7346-7353, 2019.
  5. Wenmian Yang, Guangtao Zeng, Bowen Tan, Zeqian Ju, Subrato Chakravorty, Xuehai He, Shu Chen, Xingyi Yang, Qingyang Wu, Zhou Yu, et al. On the generation of medical dialogues for covid-19. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.05442 , 2020. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
He, X., Chen, S., Ju, Z., Dong, X., Fang, H., Wang, S., Yang, Y., Zeng, J., Zhang, R., Zhang, R., Zhou, M., Zhu, P., & Xie, P.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2004.03329
arXiv
2004.03329
OpenAlex
W3041261470
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
medical dialogue systems, dialogue dataset, telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review