The DOI matches its DataCite record; 146 of the 230 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims
Open accessAbstract
With the recent wave of progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has come a growing awareness of the large-scale impacts of AI systems, and recognition that existing regulations and norms in industry and academia are insufficient to ensure responsible AI development. In order for AI developers to earn trust from system users, customers, civil society, governments, and other stakeholders that they are building AI responsibly, they will need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. Those outside of a given organization also need effective means of scrutinizing such claims. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems and their associated development processes, with a focus on providing evidence about the safety, security, fairness, and privacy protection of AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Provenance records may contain sensitive timestamps or workflow traces”
From Designing automated audit mechanisms to evaluate compliance of generative AI platforms with federal authorship and ownership disclosure requirements. (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Where external model providers or plug-ins are used, vendor audits ensure provenance capture and persistence obligations are met across integrated systems [37,34].”
From Designing automated audit mechanisms to evaluate compliance of generative AI platforms with federal authorship and ownership disclosure requirements. (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Besides governmental organizations, a wealth of companies also release their guidelines or principles to demonstrate their compliance with AI trustworthiness [27, 58, 37, 15, 14, 82].”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“To ensure that the provenance is tamper proof, the blockchain has been recently considered as a promising tool to certify data provenance in AI [96, 14].”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865 · cited 1×
“Training data can be rigorously evaluated for representativeness [63] [64]; assumptions can be characterized by evaluating modular components of an AI model and by clearly communicating output uncertainties; and performance can be characterized by measuring generalization, fairness, and performance heterogeneity acros…”
BackgroundVisualizing and understanding convolutional networks
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 · Cited by 15,839
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Rudin, C. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x · Cited by 10,561 · cited 1×
“This lack of interpretability in AI systems has raised concerns about using AI models in high stakes decision-making contexts where human welfare may be compromised [73].”
BackgroundExplaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples
Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6572 · Cited by 10,381 · cited 1×
“• This system is robust even to adversarial examples [57] [58];”
BackgroundThe future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6199 · Cited by 8,143 · cited 1×
“• This system is robust even to adversarial examples [57] [58];”
BackgroundIntroduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination
Haas, P. M. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300001442 · Cited by 7,891
Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning
Kairouz, P., & McMahan, H. B. (2021) · Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000083 · Cited by 7,772 · cited 2×
“, service provider), while keeping the training data decentralized [94].”
BackgroundSelf-citationCalibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis
Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., & Smith, A. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11681878_14 · Cited by 7,272
Flagged first, then by citations
84 of the 230 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 315
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0002 · Cited by 6
Wu, Y.-H. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00535-1 · Cited by 6
“EBA provides “a structured process whereby an entity’s present or past behavior is assessed for consistency with relevant principles or norms” [13–14]; it does so by translating abstract principles into “verifiable claims,” which are “statements for which evidence and arguments can be brought to…”
InfluentialPyTorch, Explain! A Python library for Logic Explained NetworksPreprint
Barbiero, P., Ciravegna, G., Georgiev, D., & Giannini, F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.11697 · Cited by 8
“…Intelligence (XAI) has become strategic and has been massively encouraged, leading to the development of a variety of techniques that aim at explaining black-box models (Das and Rad, 2020; Brundage et al., 2020) or at developing effective interpretable models (Carvalho et al., 2019; Rudin, 2019).”
BackgroundBraga, J., Regateiro, F. S., Stiubiener, I., & Braga, J. C. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/wexjr · Cited by 5
Pushing Boundaries or Crossing Lines? The Complex Ethics of ChatGPT JailbreakingPreprint
Boxleitner, A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4604736 · Cited by 4
Omogiate, P. M. (2023) · International Journal of Science and Research Archive · doi:10.30574/ijsra.2023.10.2.1099 · Cited by 3
Dzorka, M. A., & Mawutor, J. K. M. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83549-105-820251007 · Cited by 3
Responsible AI: Portraits With Intelligent Bibliometrics
Zhang, Y., Wu, M., Zhang, G., & Lü, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2024.3510474 · Cited by 6
“This section is to conceptualize the definition and principles of RAI by distinguishing it from related concepts such as explainable AI (XAI), trustworthy AI (TAI), and ethical AI (EAI) and theoretically elaborating academic debates, industry standards, and domain practices.”
Understanding User Engagement With Gemini Through Sentiment Analysis and Concept Mapping
Çelik, A. A., Balcıoğlu, Y. S., & Altındağ, E. (2025) · International Journal of Business Analytics · doi:10.4018/ijban.375429 · Cited by 4
A step toward a micromechanics‐informed neural network for predicting asphalt mixture stiffness
Anupam, K., Berangi, M., Camargo, J. C., Kasbergen, C., & Erkens, S. M. J. G. (2025) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.70000 · Cited by 4
“Interpretability is widely recognized as a crucial aspect of predictive modeling, particularly in scientific and engineering applications where trust in model predictions is essential (Brundage et al., 2020; Lo Piano, 2020; Thiebes et al., 2021).”
Ética na era dos Modelos de Linguagem Massivos (LLMs): um estudo de caso do ChatGPT
Figênio, M. R., & Gomes-Jr, L. (2023) · doi:10.5753/erbd.2023.229510 · Cited by 3
Bimczok, S. P., Godynyuk, E. A., Pierey, J., Roppel, M. S., & Scholz, M. L. (2023) · South Eastern European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.56801/seejph.vi.239 · Cited by 4
ENHANCING WRITING COMPREHENSION IN L2 ARABIC LEARNERS THROUGH AI-BASED TRANSLANGUAGING CHATBOTS
Zaimah, N. R., Fatchiatuzahro, F., & Hartanto, E. B. (2024) · Al-Mubin Islamic Scientific Journal · doi:10.51192/almubin.v7i1.753 · Cited by 7
“There has been an increase of concerns in numerous disciplines (Ashoori & Weisz, 2019; Brundage et al., 2020; Hatherley, 2020).”
BackgroundTowards a Robust and Trustworthy Machine Learning System Development.Preprint
Xiong, P., Buffett, S., Iqbal, S., Lamontagne, P., Mamun, M., & Molyneaux, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Practices for Engineering Trustworthy Machine Learning Applications
Serban, A., van der Blom, K., Hoos, H. H., & Visser, J. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) · doi:10.1109/wain52551.2021.00021 · Cited by 24
“These areas of interest are commonly grouped under the term trustworthy ML [1], [7].”
BackgroundStreet-Map Based Validation of Semantic Segmentation in Autonomous Driving
von Rueden, L., Wirtz, T., Hueger, F., et al. (2021) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9413292 · Cited by 2
“To ensure the safety of AI-based systems, mechanisms that support a trustworthy development like interpretability, auditing and risk assessment are discussed with growing interest [5].”
BackgroundFloridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0005 · Cited by 2
Ethical AI governance, trust and deepfake regulation in the UAE’s media landscape
Heluey, N. (2025) · Journal of Digital Media & Policy · doi:10.1386/jdmp_00173_1 · Cited by 2
Effective Enforceability of EU Competition Law Under AI Development Scenarios
Hua, S.-S., & Belfield, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3600211.3604694 · Cited by 4
“If compute is the bottleneck, then effective enforceability of competition law may be higher, as it is likely to be easier to regulate relative to data or talent [3], [39].”
BackgroundSelf-citationEthical Challenges in Open Learning Analytics
Fetahović, I., Mekić, E., Kuk, K. V., Popovic, B. M., & Dolićanin, E. Ć. (2023) · Scientific Publications of the State University of Novi Pazar Series A Applied Mathematics Informatics and mechanics · doi:10.46793/spsunp2302.073f · Cited by 3
Ignesti, G., Martinelli, M., & Moroni, D. (2024) · Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis · doi:10.1134/s1054661824700974 · Cited by 2
“Ethics proposes guidelines so developers and organisations can create AI systems that respect human rights and societal values, promoting a human-centric approach to technology [3].”
Zhang, X., Zhou, W., Hu, W., Zhou, S., Hu, X., & Yang, L. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102900 · Cited by 1
Babu, C. V. S., & Albert Gururaja, V. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9851-7.ch007 · Cited by 2
Coglianese, C., & Lai, A. (2022) · doi:10.51868/10 · Cited by 2
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0003 · Cited by 2
AI and the UN Sustainable Development Goals
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0012 · Cited by 2
Fostering Awareness of Social Sustainability in Digital Business
Serrano, J. C., Diduc, S., Šilenskytė, A., Balakrishnan, M. S., & Aguirre, K. M. N. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50168-5_8 · Cited by 2
Continuous Subject-in-the-Loop Integration: Centering AI on Marginalized CommunitiesPreprint
Roewer-Després, F., & Berscheid, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.01128 · Cited by 2
Kazim, E., Polle, R., Carvalho, G., Koshiyama, A., Inness, C., Knight, A., Gorski, C., Barber, D., Lomas, E., Yılmaz, E., et al. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3935987 · Cited by 2
Analysis of Smart Meter Data for Energy Waste Management
Batic, D., Stanković, L., & Stanković, V. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49979-1_8 · Cited by 1
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE : ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MAQASID AL-SHARIAH
Yunos, A. S., & Hamdan, M. N. (2024) · Journal of Information System and Technology Management · doi:10.35631/jistm.935004 · Cited by 1
The Level of Implementing AI and its Framework for Creating Structured Strategy for Corporations
Akramov, J., & Valiev, B. (2024) · International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) · doi:10.1109/icacite60783.2024.10617232 · Cited by 1
Accomplishment of Toxicity Prediction by CADD Tools
Kaushik, N., & Kumar, S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-4154-3_16 · Cited by 2
Brand Voice Alignment in Chatbots: Comparison of Prompt Engineering and LLM Fine-tuning
Sharma, S., & Afzal, N. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology · doi:10.1109/eit64391.2025.11103650 · Cited by 1
A development framework for human work integrated AI systems in manufacturing
Yamamoto, Y., Muñoz, Á. A., & Sandström, K. (2025) · Frontiers in Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.3389/fmtec.2025.1601903 · Cited by 1
Institutionalizing trust in AI governance: from ethical principles to legal design
Lyu, X. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01009-2 · Cited by 1
“Protection also entails a pre-cautionary orientation, prioritizing societal well-being in contexts where risks are high and uncertainty persists [14, 43 , 89].”
Affordance Analyses of AI Safety Policies: A Proof-of-Concept using OpenAI's Preparedness Framework
Coggins, S., Saeri, A. K., Daniell, K. A., Henne, K., Ruster, L. P., Liu, J., & Davis, J. L. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812331 · Cited by 1
“AI developers proliferate AI risks by developing and disseminating capabilities that enable social harms [6, 49].”
Manziuk, E. (2022) · Computer Systems and Information Technologies · doi:10.31891/csit-2022-1-11 · Cited by 1
Soft Ethics and the Governance of AI
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0006 · Cited by 1
Reevaluating Human Values for Patient Care in the Age of Artificial Intelligence:
Lopez, M. (2024) · Journal of AI Law and Regulation · doi:10.21552/aire/2024/1/7 · Cited by 1
Al-Ghazali’s principle of trust (Amanah) as a framework for ethical AI governance in organizations
Serevan, B. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00780-y · Cited by 5
Price of Security: Balancing Security With Civil Liberties and Risks in AI-Driven Surveillance
Arora, M. K., Lal, S., Singh, B., & Raghav, A. S. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83608-156-220251009 · Cited by 1
Reviewable Automated Decision-Making: A Framework for Accountable Algorithmic Systems
Cobbe, J., Lee, M. S. A., & Singh, J. P. (2021) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.65493 · Cited by 1
A New Approach to Better Consensus Building and Agreement Implementation for Trustworthy AI Systems
Yanagisawa, Y., & Yokote, Y. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83906-2_26 · Cited by 2
Serrano, M., Khorsand, B., Soldatos, J. K., Troiano, E., Neises, J., Kranas, P., Perakis, K., Mamelli, A., Elicegui, I., Kyriazis, D., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1561/9781638282297 · Cited by 2
Models for Classifying AI Systems: The Switch, the Ladder, and the MatrixPreprint
Mökander, J., Sheth, M., Watson, D., & Floridi, L. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4141677 · Cited by 1
A proposal to improve research in AI algorithm and data governancePreprint
Braga, J., Regateiro, F. S., Stiubiener, I., & Braga, J. C. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/sr7kt · Cited by 1
From medical imaging to explainable artificial intelligence
Tjoa, E. (2022) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/164493 · Cited by 1
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0003 · Cited by 1
Tella, A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95689-5.00060-2 · Cited by 1
État de la situation sur les impacts sociétaux de l'intelligence artificielle et du numérique - 2024
Obvia, Langlois, L., Cousineau, M., Gagnon, M.-P., Larnder, C. I., Naffi, N., Garneau, J., Lévesque, C., Brin, C., Guèvremont, V., et al. (2024) · doi:10.61737/cfrt3613 · Cited by 3
Index Multilinear Tree-based Cross Chain for Decentralized Identity Governance
Guo, C., Xie, T., & Gai, K. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud, IEEE International Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing, and IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (BigDataSecurity/HPSC/IDS) · doi:10.1109/hpsc62738.2024.00018 · Cited by 1
Advancing Agency: Digital Self-Determination as a Framework for AI GovernancePreprint
Marcucci, S., & Verhulst, S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5343658 · Cited by 1
Outlining Traceability: A Principle for Operationalizing Accountability in Computing Systems
Kroll, J. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445937 · Cited by 2
“these tools can be extended to methods for trustworthy system development [45].”
BackgroundNose to Glass: Looking In to Get BeyondPreprint
Seah, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.13153
DenseHMM: Learning Hidden Markov Models by Learning Dense Representations
Sicking, J., Pintz, M., Akila, M., & Wirtz, T. (2022) · International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods · doi:10.5220/0010821800003122 · Cited by 2
“…machine learning (Saltzer and Schroeder, 1975; Dwork et al., 2012; Amodei et al., 2016; Gu et al., 2017; Varshney, 2019; Toreini et al., 2020; Brundage et al., 2020) indicate, however, that these latter aspects become more and more crucial or even mandatory for real-world learning systems.”
BackgroundA Mixed-Method Design Approach for Empirically Based Selection of Unbiased Data Annotators
Thakur, G. M., Caspersen, J. R., Herrmannová, D., Eaton, B., & Burdette, J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.169
“…of guidelines and policies surrounding the ethical use of machine learning (Wiens et al., 2019), platforms and tool-boxes for diagnosing biases (Brundage et al., 2020), recommended practices, and frameworks for evaluating the fairness and explainability (Hardt et al., 2016; Beutel et al.,…”
BackgroundSafe Transformative AI via a Windfall ClausePreprint
Bova, P., Müller, J. E., & Harack, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.09404
“…TAI has motivated the above researchers and others in AI governance to outline policies which aim to improve the safety of TAI development (Askell et al., 2019; Whittlestone et al., 2019; Han et al., 2020; Clark & Hadfield, 2020; Brundage et al., 2020; Tzachor et al., 2020; Vinuesa et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSkizzierung einer vertrauensvollen künstlichen Intelligenz
Kunst, I. (2021) · Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63223-9_7
Uma proposta para impulsionar as pesquisas em governança de algoritmos de IA e dadosPreprint
Braga, J., Regateiro, F. S., Stiubiener, I., & Braga, J. C. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/xcpsd
Do We Use the Right Elements for Assurance Case Development?
Gilal, A. R., Palli, A. S., Jaafar, J., et al. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20429-6_27
Verifying the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in a Digitalized World
Kelle, A., & Forman, J. E. (2022) · Studies in peace and security · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11043-6_6
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0009
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0001
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0004
Mapping the Ethics of Algorithms
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0007
How to Deliver a Good AI Society
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0010
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0007
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0008
List of Most Common Abbreviations and Acronyms
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0011
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0011
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0010
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0009
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.002.0005
Floridi, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.003.0013
Interactive web application for Explainable DNN-based AI models in oncology
Paneta, V., Brocki, L., Eleftheriadis, V., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1109/nssmicrtsd49126.2023.10338566
Coovadia, H., Marx, B., & Botha, I. (2024) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46177-4_15
Study on Test Plan Establishment for Enhancing Trustworthiness of Artificial Intelligence Systems
Shin, Y., & Kang, S. (2023) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC) · doi:10.1109/ictc58733.2023.10392498
“Previous studies [3], [4], [5] have described the verification and test method for improving the trustworthiness of AIS.”
ResultArtificial Intelligence Tools for Academic WorkPreprint
Rahman, M. M. A. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2gz4n
Ologunoye, O. T., Adisa, T. A., & Mordi, C. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4791847
Explainable AI for Tuberculosis Detection using Deep Learning
Kore, S., Nakhate, P. S., Rajput, Y., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-18344
The Role AI in Supporting Medical Data Field with Machine Learning Technique
Arulkumar, A., Yogi, R., Jeyalaxmi, M., Alabdeli, H. M., Singh, K. R., & Choubey, S. B. (2024) · International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) · doi:10.1109/icacite60783.2024.10617415
Carrillo, I., Fernández, C., Vicente, M. A., Guilabert, M., Sánchez, A., Gil, E., Arroyo, A., Calderón, M., Carratalá, M. C., López, A., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of The Global Conference on Women’s Studies · doi:10.33422/womensconf.v3i1.466 · Cited by 1
“Such behaviors may manifest as unbalanced political opinions, dissemination of incorrect scientific statements, or even the encouragement of illegal or dangerous activities (Bender et al., 2021; Brundage et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPlatform Liability for Platform ManipulationPreprint
Pate, S. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4990050
Volume 7 (2024) Artificial Intelligence and Responsibility
Alnajashi, A. A., DeRise, D., Frana, P. L., McGraw, D. K., Sawyer, A. G., Titareva, T., Zaini, R. M., & Zombron, A. (2024) · International Journal on Responsibility · doi:10.62365/2576-0955.1139 · Cited by 1
Trustworthy Hybrid Decision-Making
Mantri, I., & Sasikumar, N. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74627-7_17
The University as an AI Ombudsman—Part II
Wu, Y. (2025) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2024.3520882
Research Agenda for Sociotechnical Approaches to AI SafetyPreprint
Curtis, S., Iyer, R., Kirk‐Giannini, C. D., Krakovna, V., Krueger, D., Lambert, N., Marnette, B., McKenzie, C., Michael, J., Miyazono, E., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5097286
Self-citationInnovative Robotic Systems in Criminal Investigations
Alsheihi, J. A. (2025) · Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management · doi:10.52783/jisem.v10i33s.5753
You’ve Got the Wrong Outfit: Evaluating Deep Learning Paradigms on Digit and Fashion Recognition
Ignesti, G., Martinelli, M., & Moroni, D. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87663-9_17
Operationalizing AI Ethics - A Quantifiable Framework for Implementation and Assessment
Kumar, D., Singla, B. S., & Choudhary, R. K. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches in Technology and Management for Social Innovation (IATMSI) · doi:10.1109/iatmsi64286.2025.10985308
“The enforcement framework builds upon the assessment methodology by implementing automated monitoring and adaptive response mechanisms for ethical compliance [15].”
Position: Contextual Confidence and Generative AI
Jain, S., Hitzig, Z., & Mishkin, P. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml64287.2025.00022
Buriro, S. (2025) · UCP Journal of Law & Legal Education · doi:10.24312/ucp-jlle.03.01.311
How emerging technologies are reshaping audit success factors
Li, Y. (2023) · Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) · doi:10.54014/ccnj-pe13
Potencial y aplicaciones de la inteligencia artificial en seguridad
Linares, F., & Salazar-Curichimba, B. M. (2025) · Razón Crítica · doi:10.21789/25007807.2111 · Cited by 3
Demystifying Deep Learning and Its Applications in Time Series Forecasting
Reddy, T. S. (2025) · Technix International Journal for Engineering Research · doi:10.56975/tijer.v12i6.158419
In Which Areas of Technical AI Safety Could Geopolitical Rivals Cooperate?
Bucknall, B., Siddiqui, S., Thurnherr, L., McGurk, C., Harack, B., Reuel, A., Paskov, P., Mahoney, C., Mindermann, S., Singer, S., et al. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732201 · Cited by 3
“Verification mechanisms are technical procedures that could allow for the certification of claims about an AI system or related resources (for example, the locations and specifications of data centers) [16, 29].”
Recommendations for Lawmakers Towards Building a Trustworthy AI Ecosystem
Raghav, A. S., Lal, S., Arora, M. K., & Singh, B. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83608-156-220251008
Assessing Existing Legal Frameworks and Their Adaptability to AI Advancements
Lal, S., Arora, M. K., Raghav, A. S., & Singh, B. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83608-156-220251011
Legal Framework for the Use of AI in Security Intelligence
Singh, B., Arora, M. K., Lal, S., & Raghav, A. S. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83608-156-220251006
Metadata
- Authors
- Brundage, M., Avin, S., Wang, J., Belfield, H., Krueger, G., Hadfield, G., Khlaaf, H., Yang, J., Toner, H., Fong, R., Maharaj, T., Koh, P. W., Hooker, S., Leung, J., Trask, A., Bluemke, E., Lebensold, J., O'Keefe, C., Koren, M., Ryffel, T., Rubinovitz, J., Besiroglu, T., Carugati, F., Clark, J., Eckersley, P., de Haas, S., Johnson, M., Laurie, B., Ingerman, A., Krawczuk, I., Askell, A., Cammarota, R., Lohn, A., Krueger, D., Stix, C., Henderson, P., Graham, L., Prunkl, C., Martin, B., Seger, E., Zilberman, N., hÉigeartaigh, S. Ó., Kroeger, F., Sastry, G., Kagan, R., Weller, A., Tse, B., Barnes, E., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Herbert-Voss, A., Rasser, M., Sodhani, S., Flynn, C., Gilbert, T. K., Dyer, L., Khan, S., Bengio, Y., & Anderljung, M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Centre Universitaire de Mila (DZ)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Adelard (GB)
- Center for Security and Emerging Technology (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Google (United States) (US)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Coventry University (GB)
- Center for a New American Security (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- ORCID
- Avin, Shahar
- Belfield, Haydn
- Hadfield, Gillian
- Yang, Jingying
- Fong, Ruth
- Maharaj, Tegan
- Koh, Pang Wei
- Hooker, Sara
- Trask, Andrew
- Bluemke, Emma
- Ryffel, Théo
- Besiroglu, Tamay
- Carugati, Federica
- Laurie, Ben
- Ingerman, Alex
- Krawczuk, Igor
- Cammarota, Rosario
- Lohn, Andrew
- Krueger, David
- Stix, Charlotte
- Henderson, Peter
- Prunkl, Carina
- Seger, Elizabeth
- Zilberman, Noa
- hÉigeartaigh, Seán Ó
- Kroeger, Frens
- Weller, Adrian
- Barnes, Elizabeth
- Dafoe, Allan
- Sodhani, Shagun
- Gilbert, Thomas Krendl
- Khan, Saif
- Bengio, Yoshua
- Anderljung, Markus
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2004.07213
- OpenAlex
- W4287552728
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 230
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 16
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- trustworthy AI, responsible AI development, accountability, AI safety, AI security, algorithmic fairness, privacy preservation, stakeholder scrutiny, verification methods, AI governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
