PreprintCited by 30Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards data-driven stroke rehabilitation via wearable sensors and deep learning

Open access

Abstract

Recovery after stroke is often incomplete, but rehabilitation training may potentiate recovery by engaging endogenous neuroplasticity. In preclinical models of stroke, high doses of rehabilitation training are required to restore functional movement to the affected limbs of animals. In humans, however, the necessary dose of training to potentiate recovery is not known. This ignorance stems from the lack of objective, pragmatic approaches for measuring training doses in rehabilitation activities. Here, to develop a measurement approach, we took the critical first step of automatically identifying functional primitives, the basic building block of activities. Forty-eight individuals with chronic stroke performed a variety of rehabilitation activities while wearing inertial measurement units (IMUs) to capture upper body motion. Primitives were identified by human labelers, who labeled and segmented the associated IMU data. We performed automatic classification of these primitives using machine learning. We designed a convolutional neural network model that outperformed existing methods. The model includes an initial module to compute separate embeddings of different physical quantities in the sensor data. In addition, it replaces batch normalization (which performs normalization based on statistics computed from the training data) with instance normalization (which uses statistics computed from the test data). This increases robustness to possible distributional shifts when applying the method to new patients. With this approach, we attained an average classification accuracy of 70%. Thus, using a combination of IMU-based motion capture and deep learning, we were able to identify primitives automatically. This approach builds towards objectively-measured rehabilitation training, enabling the identification and counting of functional primitives that accrues to a training dose.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2004.08297

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Kaku, A., Parnandi, A., Venkatesan, A., Pandit, N., Schambra, H., & Fernandez-Granda, C.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
126
Pages
143-171
OpenAlex
W3016927687
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K02NS104207)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM013316)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
stroke rehabilitation, chronic stroke, inertial measurement unit, wearable sensors, convolutional neural networks, instance normalization, distribution shift, upper body movement, motor recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards data-driven stroke rehabilitation via wearable sensors and deep learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2004.08297
The paper
Kaku, A., Parnandi, A., Venkatesan, A., Pandit, N., Schambra, H., & Fernandez-Granda, C. (2020). Towards data-driven stroke rehabilitation via wearable sensors and deep learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2004.08297