PreprintCited by 4Coding theory and cryptographyCryptography and Data SecurityCryptography and Residue Arithmetic

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

HQC-RMRS, an instantiation of the HQC encryption framework with a more efficient auxiliary error-correcting code

Open access

Abstract

The HQC encryption framework is a general code-based encryption scheme for which decryption returns a noisy version of the plaintext. Any instantiation of the scheme will therefore use an error-correcting procedure relying on a fixed auxiliary code. Unlike the McEliece encryption framework whose security is directly related to how well one can hide the structure of an error-correcting code, the security reduction of the HQC encryption framework is independent of the nature of the auxiliary decoding procedure which is publicly available. What is expected from it is that the decoding algorithm is both efficient and has a decoding failure rate which can be easily modelized and analyzed. The original error-correction procedure proposed for the HQC framework was to use tensor products of BCH codes and repetition codes. In this paper we consider another code family for removing the error vector deriving from the general framework: the concatenation of Reed-Muller and Reed-Solomon codes. We denote this instantiation of the HQC framework by HQC-RMRS. These codes yield better decoding results than the BCH and repetition codes: overall we gain roughly 17\% in the size of the key and the ciphertext, while keeping a simple modelization of the decoding error rate. The paper also presents a simplified and more precise analysis of the distribution of the error vector output by the HQC protocol.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2005.10741

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Aragon, N., Gaborit, P., & Zémor, G.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3028101122
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Keywords
HQC, code-based cryptography, error-correcting codes, Reed-Muller codes, Reed-Solomon codes, BCH codes, repetition codes, McEliece cryptosystem, decoding error rate, public-key encryption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HQC-RMRS, an instantiation of the HQC encryption framework with a more efficient auxiliary error-correcting code. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2005.10741
The paper
Aragon, N., Gaborit, P., & Zémor, G. (2020). HQC-RMRS, an instantiation of the HQC encryption framework with a more efficient auxiliary error-correcting code. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2005.10741