CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 241Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Digital zero noise extrapolation for quantum error mitigation

Open access
Giurgica-Tiron, Tudor, Hindy, Yousef, LaRose, Ryan, Mari, Andrea, Zeng, William J.·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2005.10921arXiv 2005.10921
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) is an increasingly popular technique for mitigating errors in noisy quantum computations without using additional quantum resources. We review the fundamentals of ZNE and propose several improvements to noise scaling and extrapolation, the two key components in the technique. We introduce unitary folding and parameterized noise scaling. These are digital noise scaling frameworks, i.e. one can apply them using only gate-level access common to most quantum instruction sets. We also study different extrapolation methods, including a new adaptive protocol that uses a statistical inference framework. Benchmarks of our techniques show error reductions of 18X to 24X over non-mitigated circuits and demonstrate ZNE effectiveness at larger qubit numbers than have been tested previously. In addition to presenting new results, this work is a self-contained introduction to the practical use of ZNE by quantum programmers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2005.10921

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1][1] J. Preskill, 'Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond,' Quantum , vol. 2, p. 79, Aug. 2018. -
  2. [3][3] D. Gottesman, 'An introduction to quantum error correction and faulttolerant quantum computation,' pp. 13-58, 2010. -
  3. [5][5] K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, 'Error Mitigation for ShortDepth Quantum Circuits,' Physical Review Letters , vol. 119, p. 180509, 11 2017. -
  4. [6][6] S. Endo, S. C. Benjamin, and Y. Li, 'Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications,' Physical Review X , vol. 8, no. 3, p. 031027, 2018. -
  5. [7][7] J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, 'Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling,' Physical Review A , vol. 94, no. 5, p. 052325, 2016. -
  6. [8][8] E. Knill, 'Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices,' Nature , vol. 434, no. 7029, pp. 39-44, 2005. -
  7. [9][9] L. F. Santos and L. Viola, 'Dynamical control of qubit coherence: Random versus deterministic schemes,' Physical Review A , vol. 72, no. 6, p. 062303, 2005. -
  8. [10][10] L. Viola and E. Knill, 'Random decoupling schemes for quantum dynamical control and error suppression,' Physical review letters , vol. 94, no. 6, p. 060502, 2005. -
  9. [11][11] B. Pokharel, N. Anand, B. Fortman, and D. A. Lidar, 'Demonstration of fidelity improvement using dynamical decoupling with superconducting qubits,' Physical review letters , vol. 121, no. 22, p. 220502, 2018. -
  10. [12][12] P. Sekatski, M. Skotiniotis, and W. D¨ ur, 'Dynamical decoupling leads to improved scaling in noisy quantum metrology,' New Journal of Physics , vol. 18, no. 7, p. 073034, 2016. -
  11. [13][13] H. Ball, M. J. Biercuk, A. Carvalho, R. Chakravorty, J. Chen, L. A. de Castro, S. Gore, D. Hover, M. Hush, P. J. Liebermann, et al. , 'Software tools for quantum control: Improving quantum computer performance through noise and error suppression,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04060 , 2020. - · arXiv
  12. [14][14] T. J. Green, J. Sastrawan, H. Uys, and M. J. Biercuk, 'Arbitrary quantum control of qubits in the presence of universal noise,' New Journal of Physics , vol. 15, no. 9, p. 095004, 2013. -
  13. [15][15] Y. Li and S. C. Benjamin, 'Efficient Variational Quantum Simulator Incorporating Active Error Minimization,' Physical Review X , vol. 7, 6 2017. -
  14. [16][16] A. Kandala, K. Temme, A. D. C´ orcoles, A. Mezzacapo, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, 'Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor,' Nature , vol. 567, no. 7749, pp. 491-495, 2019. -
  15. [17][17] R. S. Smith, M. J. Curtis, and W. J. Zeng, 'A practical quantum instruction set architecture,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03355 , 2016. - · arXiv
  16. [18][18] D. C. McKay, C. J. Wood, S. Sheldon, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, 'Efficient Z gates for quantum computing,' Physical Review A , vol. 96, 8 2017. -
  17. [19][19] X. Fu, L. Riesebos, M. Rol, J. van Straten, J. van Someren, N. Khammassi, I. Ashraf, R. Vermeulen, V. Newsum, K. Loh, et al. , 'eqasm: An executable quantum instruction set architecture,' in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) , pp. 224-237, IEEE, 2019. -
  18. [20][20] A. He, B. Nachman, W. A. de Jong, and C. W. Bauer, 'Resource efficient zero noise extrapolation with identity insertions,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04941 , 2020. - · arXiv
  19. [21][21] E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, T. Papenbrock, R. C. Pooser, D. J. Dean, and P. Lougovski, 'Cloud quantum computing of an atomic nucleus,' Physical review letters , vol. 120, no. 21, p. 210501, 2018. -
  20. [23][23] J. P. Barnes, C. J. Trout, D. Lucarelli, and B. D. Clader, 'Quantum errorcorrection failure distributions: Comparison of coherent and stochastic error models,' Phys. Rev. A , vol. 95, p. 062338, Jun 2017. -
  21. [24][24] C. B. Mendl and M. M. Wolf, 'Unital Quantum Channels - Convex Structure and Revivals of Birkhoff's Theorem,' Communications in Mathematical Physics , vol. 289, pp. 1057-1086, Aug. 2009. -
  22. [25][25] J. True Merrill and K. R. Brown, 'Progress in compensating pulse sequences for quantum computation,' arXiv e-prints , p. arXiv:1203.6392, Mar. 2012. - · arXiv
  23. [26][26] Z.-H. Wang, W. Zhang, A. M. Tyryshkin, S. A. Lyon, J. W. Ager, E. E. Haller, and V. V. Dobrovitski, 'Effect of pulse error accumulation on dynamical decoupling of the electron spins of phosphorus donors in silicon,' Phys. Rev. B , vol. 85, p. 085206, Feb 2012. -
  24. [27][27] Z.-H. Wang and V. V. Dobrovitski, 'Aperiodic dynamical decoupling sequences in the presence of pulse errors,' Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics , vol. 44, p. 154004, Aug. 2011. -
  25. [28][28] M. Otten and S. K. Gray, 'Recovering noise-free quantum observables,' Physical Review A , vol. 99, no. 1, p. 012338, 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Giurgica-Tiron, T., Hindy, Y., LaRose, R., Mari, A., & Zeng, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Xanadu Quantum Technologies (Canada) (CA)
  • Goldman Sachs (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Pages
306-316
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2005.10921
arXiv
2005.10921
OpenAlex
W3028056599
Cited by
241
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 1
FWCI
10.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Unicam Scientific Publications (University of Camerino) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0020266)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
zero-noise extrapolation, quantum error mitigation, noise scaling, extrapolation, statistical inference, noisy quantum circuits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital zero noise extrapolation for quantum error mitigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2005.10921
The paper
Giurgica-Tiron, T., Hindy, Y., LaRose, R., Mari, A., & Zeng, W. J. (2020). Digital zero noise extrapolation for quantum error mitigation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2005.10921