Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 478

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Design Science Research Process: A Model for Producing and Presenting Information Systems Research

Open access
Ken Peffers, Tuure Tuunanen, Charles E. Gengler, Matti Rossi, Wendy Hui, Ville Virtanen, Johanna Bragge·2020·arXiv (Cornell University)
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2006.02763arXiv 2006.02763
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.48550/arxiv.2006.02763

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Gengler, C. E., Rossi, M., Hui, W., Virtanen, V., & Bragge, J.
Venue
arXiv (Cornell University)
Publisher
Cornell University
Published
2020-06-04
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2006.02763
arXiv
2006.02763
OpenAlex
W2311045093
Cited by
478
References
29
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design Science Research Process: A Model for Producing and Presenting Information Systems Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2006.02763
The paper
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Gengler, C. E., Rossi, M., Hui, W., Virtanen, V., & Bragge, J. (2020). Design Science Research Process: A Model for Producing and Presenting Information Systems Research. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2006.02763

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.