CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 94Neural Networks and Reservoir ComputingQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and Cryptography

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Gaussian states of continuous-variable quantum systems provide universal and versatile reservoir computing

Open access
Nokkala, Johannes, Martínez-Peña, Rodrigo, Giorgi, Gian Luca, Parigi, Valentina, Soriano, Miguel C., Zambrini, Roberta·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2006.04821arXiv 2006.04821
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We establish the potential of continuous-variable Gaussian states of linear dynamical systems for machine learning tasks. Specifically, we consider reservoir computing, an efficient framework for online time series processing. As a reservoir we consider a quantum harmonic network modeling e.g. linear quantum optical systems. We prove that unlike universal quantum computing, universal reservoir computing can be achieved without non-Gaussian resources. We find that encoding the input time series into Gaussian states is both a source and a means to tune the nonlinearity of the overall input-output map. We further show that the full potential of the proposed model can be reached by encoding to quantum fluctuations, such as squeezed vacuum, instead of classical intense fields or thermal fluctuations. Our results introduce a new research paradigm for reservoir computing harnessing the dynamics of a quantum system and the engineering of Gaussian quantum states, pushing both fields into a new direction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2006.04821

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Alpaydin, E. Introduction to Machine Learning (MIT press, 2020).
  2. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (eds.
  3. Michael I. Jordan, Yann LeCun & Sara A. Solla) 1097-1105 (MIT Press, One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA, 2012).
  4. Hinton, G. et al. Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: the shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 29, 82-97 (2012).
  5. Linn, E., Rosezin, R., Tappertzhofen, S., Böttger, U. & Waser, R. Beyond von neumann-logic operations in passive crossbar arrays alongside memory operations. Nanotechnology 23, 305205 (2012).
  6. Wittek, P. Quantum Machine Learning: What Quantum Computing Means to Data Mining (Academic Press, 2014).
  7. Dunjko, V. & Briegel, H. J. Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 074001 (2018).
  8. Torrontegui, E. & García-Ripoll, J. J. Unitary quantum perceptron as efficient universal approximator. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 125, 30004 (2019).
  9. Killoran, N. et al. Continuous-variable quantum neural networks. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033063 (2019).
  10. Amin, M. H., Andriyash, E., Rolfe, J., Kulchytskyy, B. & Melko, R. Quantum boltzmann machine. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021050 (2018).
  11. Adhikary, S., Dangwal, S. & Bhowmik, D. Supervised learning with a quantum classifier using multi-level systems. Quantum Inf. Process. 19, 89 (2020).
  12. Shao, C. A quantum model of feed-forward neural networks with unitary learning algorithms. Quantum Inf. Process. 19, 102 (2020).
  13. Brunner, D., Soriano, M. C., Mirasso, C. R. & Fischer, I. Parallel photonic information processing at gigabyte per second data rates using transient states. Nat. Commun. 4, 1364 (2013).
  14. Vandoorne, K. et al. Experimental demonstration of reservoir computing on a silicon photonics chip. Nat. Commun. 5, 3541 (2014).
  15. Larger, L. et al. High-speed photonic reservoir computing using a time-delay- based architecture: million words per second classification. Phys. Rev. X 7, 011015 (2017).
  16. Dong, J., Rafayelyan, M., Krzakala, F. & Gigan, S. Optical reservoir computing using multiple light scattering for chaotic systems prediction. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 1-12 (2019).
  17. Torrejon, J. et al. Neuromorphic computing with nanoscale spintronic oscillators. Nature 547, 428 (2017).
  18. Nakane, R., Tanaka, G. & Hirose, A. Reservoir computing with spin waves excited in a garnet film. IEEE Access 6, 4462-4469 (2018).
  19. Triefenbach, F., Demuynck, K. & Martens, J.-P. Large vocabulary continuous speech recognition with reservoir-based acoustic models. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 21, 311-315 (2014).
  20. Pathak, J., Hunt, B., Girvan, M., Lu, Z. & Ott, E. Model-free prediction of large spatiotemporally chaotic systems from data: a reservoir computing approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 024102 (2018).
  21. Jaeger, H. The "echo state" approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks-with an erratum note. German National Research Center for Information Technology GMD Technical Report. Vol. 148, 13 (German National Research Center for Information Technology, 2001).
  22. Fujii, K. & Nakajima, K. Harnessing disordered-ensemble quantum dynamics for machine learning. Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 024030 (2017).
  23. Negoro, M., Mitarai, K., Fujii, K., Nakajima, K. & Kitagawa, M. Machine learning with controllable quantum dynamics of a nuclear spin ensemble in a solid. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.10910 (2018). · arXiv
  24. Nakajima, K., Fujii, K., Negoro, M., Mitarai, K. & Kitagawa, M. Boosting computational power through spatial multiplexing in quantum reservoir computing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 034021 (2019).
  25. Chen, J. & Nurdin, H. I. Learning nonlinear input-output maps with dissipative quantum systems. Quantum Inf. Process. 18, 198 (2019).
  26. Ghosh, S., Opala, A., Matuszewski, M., Paterek, T. & Liew, T. C. Quantum reservoir processing. NPJ Quantum Inf. 5, 35 (2019).
  27. Chen, J., Nurdin, H. I. & Yamamoto, N. Temporal information processing on noisy quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024065 (2020).
  28. Kutvonen, A., Fujii, K. & Sagawa, T. Optimizing a quantum reservoir computer for time series prediction. Sci. Reports 10, 14687 (2020).
  29. Govia, L. C. G., Ribeill, G. J., Rowlands, G. E., Krovi, H. K. & Ohki, T. A. Quantum reservoir computing with a single nonlinear oscillator. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013077 (2021).
  30. Ghosh, S., Krisnanda, T., Paterek, T. & Liew, T. C. H. Universal quantum reservoir computing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.09569 (2020). · arXiv
  31. Ghosh, S., Opala, A., Matuszewski, M., Paterek, T. & Liew, T. C. Reconstructing quantum states with quantum reservoir networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (IEEE, 2020).
  32. Martínez-Peña, R., Nokkala, J., Giorgi, G., Zambrini, R. & Soriano, M. C. Information processing capacity of spin-based quantum reservoir computing systems. Cognit. Comput. 1-12 (2020) https://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1007/s12559-020-09772-y. · DOI
  33. Preskill, J. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  34. Lloyd, S. & Braunstein, S. L. in Quantum Information with Continuous Variables, 9-17 (Springer, 1999).
  35. Nielsen, M. A. & Chung, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
  36. Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A. & Preskill, J. Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 64, 012310 (2001).
  37. Yukawa, M. et al. Emulating quantum cubic nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. A 88, 053816 (2013).
  38. Arzani, F., Treps, N. & Ferrini, G. Polynomial approximation of non- gaussian unitaries by counting one photon at a time. Phys. Rev. A 95, 052352 (2017).
  39. Sabapathy, K. K. & Weedbrook, C. On states as resource units for universal quantum computation with photonic architectures. Phys. Rev. A 97, 062315 (2018).
  40. Nokkala, J. et al. Reconfigurable optical implementation of quantum complex networks. N. J. Phys. 20, 053024 (2018).
  41. Cai, Y. et al. Multimode entanglement in reconfigurable graph states using optical frequency combs. Nat. Commun. 8, 15645 (2017).
  42. Chen, M., Menicucci, N. C. & Pfister, O. Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement of 60 modes of a quantum optical frequency comb. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120505 (2014).
  43. Sandbo Chang, C. W. et al. Generating multimode entangled microwaves with a superconducting parametric cavity. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044019 (2018).
  44. Nielsen, W. H. P., Tsaturyan, Y., Møller, C. B., Polzik, E. S. & Schliesser, A. Multimode optomechanical system in the quantum regime. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 114, 62-66 (2017).
  45. Dambre, J., Verstraeten, D., Schrauwen, B. & Massar, S. Information processing capacity of dynamical systems. Sci. Rep. 2, 514 (2012).
  46. Adesso, G., Ragy, S. & Lee, A. R. Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 21, 1440001 (2014).
  47. Nokkala, J., Maniscalco, S. & Piilo, J. Non-markovianity over ensemble averages in quantum complex networks. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 24, 1740018 (2017).
  48. Boyd, S. & Chua, L. Fading memory and the problem of approximating nonlinear operators with volterra series. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 32, 1150-1161 (1985).
  49. Ganguli, S., Huh, D. & Sompolinsky, H. Memory traces in dynamical systems. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. 105, 18970-18975 (2008).
  50. Glauber, R. J. Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field. Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963).
  51. Weedbrook, C. et al. Gaussian quantum information. Rev. Modern Phys. 84, 621 (2012).
  52. Lami, L. et al. Gaussian quantum resource theories. Phys. Rev. A 98, 022335 (2018).
  53. Soriano, M. C., Brunner, D., Escalona-Morán, M., Mirasso, C. R. & Fischer, I. Minimal approach to neuro-inspired information processing. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 9, 68 (2015).
  54. Araujo, F. A. et al. Role of non-linear data processing on speech recognition task in the framework of reservoir computing. Sci. Rep. 10, 328 (2020).
  55. Tanaka, G. et al. Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: a review. Neural Netw. 115, 100-123 (2019).
  56. Serafini, A. Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods (CRC press, 2017).
  57. Menicucci, N. C. et al. Universal quantum computation with continuous- variable cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 110501 (2006).
  58. Hamilton, C. S. et al. Gaussian boson sampling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 170501 (2017).
  59. Lvovsky, A. I. et al. Production and applications of non-Gaussian quantum states of light. Preprint a https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16985 (2020). · arXiv
  60. Albarelli, F., Genoni, M. G., Paris, M. G. A. & Ferraro, A. Resource theory of quantum non-gaussianity and wigner negativity. Phys. Rev. A 98, 052350 (2018).
  61. Takagi, R. & Zhuang, Q. Convex resource theory of non-gaussianity. Phys. Rev. A 97, 062337 (2018).
  62. Gu, M., Weedbrook, C., Menicucci, N. C., Ralph, T. C. & van Loock, P. Quantum computing with continuous-variable clusters. Phys. Rev. A 79, 062318 (2009).
  63. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Programmable quantum gate arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 321 (1997).
  64. Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T. & Bengio, Y. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 1310-1318 (JMLR, Inc. and Microtome Publishing (United States), 2013). 100. Konkoli, Z. On reservoir computing: from mathematical foundations to unconventional applications. In Advances in Unconventional Computing, 573-607 (Springer, 2017). 101. Canaday, D., Griffith, A. & Gauthier, D. J. Rapid time series prediction with a hardware-based reservoir computer. Chaos 28, 123119 (2018). 102. Jaeger, H. Tutorial on Training Recurrent Neural Networks, Covering BPPT, RTRL, EKF and The "echo state network" approach, Vol. 5 (GMD- Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik Bonn, 2002). 103. Lukoševičius, M. in Neural networks: Tricks of the Trade, 659-686 (Springer, 2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 94

Metadata

Authors
Nokkala, J., Martínez-Peña, R., Giorgi, G. L., Parigi, V., Soriano, M. C., & Zambrini, R.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Nokkala, Johannes
  • Zambrini, Roberta
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2399-3650 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2006.04821
arXiv
2006.04821
OpenAlex
W3136756438
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Communications Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (.13039/501100011033, 10.13039, / AEI/10, MDM-2017-0711, 13039, PID2019, 10.13039/501100011033/, 501100011033, /AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033)
  • Universitat de les Illes Balears (RYC-2015-18140)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI//10.13039/501100011033/, 501100011033, MDM‐2017‐ 0711, 10.13039/501100011033, 13039, .13039/501100011033, 10.13039, AEI/10, PID2019-109094GB, PID2019, PID2019-109094GB- C21)
  • H2020 European Research Council (820079)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum reservoir computing, linear dynamical systems, squeezed vacuum, quantum fluctuations, time series processing, quantum machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaussian states of continuous-variable quantum systems provide universal and versatile reservoir computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2006.04821
The paper
Nokkala, J., Martínez-Peña, R., Giorgi, G. L., Parigi, V., Soriano, M. C., & Zambrini, R. (2020). Gaussian states of continuous-variable quantum systems provide universal and versatile reservoir computing. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2006.04821