CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 15Academic Publishing and Open Accessscientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetrics

Tracking the Twitter attention around the research efforts on the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Fang, Zhichao, Costas, Rodrigo·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2006.05783arXiv 2006.05783
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by a bulk of scientific research and related Twitter discussions. To unravel the public concerns about the COVID-19 crisis reflected in the science-based Twitter conversations, this study tracked the Twitter attention around the COVID-19 research efforts during the first three months of 2020. On the basis of nearly 1.4 million Twitter mentions of 6,162 COVID-19-related scientific publications, we investigated the temporal tweeting dynamic and the Twitter users involved in the online discussions around COVID-19-related research. The results show that the quantity of Twitter mentions of COVID-19-related publications was on rising. Scholarly-oriented Twitter users played an influential role in disseminating research outputs on COVID-19, with their tweets being frequently retweeted. Over time, a change in the focus of the Twitter discussions can be observed, from the initial attention to virological and clinical research to more practical topics, such as the potential treatments, the countermeasures by the governments, the healthcare measures, and the influences on the economy and society, in more recent times.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2006.05783

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C., & Garry, R. F. (2020). The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Medicine , 26 (4), 450-452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-0200820-9 · DOI
  2. Bedford, J., Enria, D., Giesecke, J., Heymann, D. L., Ihekweazu, C., Kobinger, G., Lane, H. C., Memish, Z., Oh, M. don, Sall, A. A., Schuchat, A., Ungchusak, K., & Wieler, L. H. (2020). COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. The Lancet , 395 (10229), 1015-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30673-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brainard, J. (2020). Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat? Science . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc7839 · DOI
  4. Callaway, E., Cyranoski, D., Mallapaty, S., Stoye, E., & Tollefson, J. (2020). The coronavirus pandemic in five powerful charts. Nature , 579 (7800), 482-483. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586020-00758-2 · DOI
  5. Chen, E., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2020). COVID-19: The first public coronavirus Twitter dataset. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv: 2003.07372 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07372 · arXiv
  6. Colavizza, G., Costas, R., Traag, V. A., Eck, N. J. van, Leeuwen, T. van, & Waltman, L. (2020). A scientometric overview of CORD-19. BioRxiv , 2020.04.20.046144. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.20.046144 · DOI
  7. Costas, R., De Rijcke, S., & Marres, N. (2017). Beyond the dependencies of altmetrics: conceptualizing 'heterogeneous couplings' between social media and science. The 2017 Altmetrics Workshop, Toronto, Canada . http://altmetrics.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/09/altmetrics17\_paper\_4.pdf
  8. Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do 'altmetrics' correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology , 66 (10), 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Díaz-Faes, A. A., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2019). Towards a second generation of 'social media metrics': Characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science. PLoS ONE , 14 (5), e0216408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216408 · DOI
  10. Erku, D. A., Belachew, S. A., Abrha, S., Sinnollareddy, M., Thomas, J., Steadman, K. J., & Tesfaye, W. H. (2020). When fear and misinformation go viral: Pharmacists' role in deterring medication misinformation during the 'infodemic' surrounding COVID-19. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.032 · DOI
  11. Fang, Z., & Costas, R. (2018). Studying the posts accumulation patterns of Altmetric.com data sources. The 2018 Altmetrics Workshop (Altmetrics18), London, UK . http://altmetrics.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/04/altmetrics18\_paper\_5\_Fang.pdf
  12. Fang, Z., & Costas, R. (2020). Studying the accumulation velocity of altmetric data tracked by Altmetric.com. Scientometrics , 123 (2), 1077-1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03405-9 · DOI
  13. Fang, Z., Dudek, J., & Costas, R. (2020). The stability of Twitter metrics: A study on unavailable Twitter mentions of scientific publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology , asi.24344. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24344 · DOI
  14. Fry, C. V., Cai, X., Zhang, Y., & Wagner, C. (2020). Consolidation in a Crisis: Patterns of International Collaboration in COVID-19 Research. SSRN Electronic Journal . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3595455 · DOI
  15. Gautret, P., Lagier, J.-C., Parola, P., Hoang, V. T., Meddeb, L., Mailhe, M., Doudier, B., Courjon, J., Giordanengo, V., Vieira, V. E., Dupont, H. T., Honoré, S., Colson, P., Chabrière, E., La Scola, B., Rolain, J.-M., Brouqui, P., & Raoult, D. (2020). Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents , 105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949 · DOI
  16. Haghani, M., Bliemer, M. C. J., Goerlandt, F., & Li, J. (2020). The scientific literature on Coronaviruses, COVID-19 and its associated safety-related research dimensions: A scientometric analysis and scoping review. Safety Science , 104806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104806 · DOI
  17. Harmer, A., Eder, B., Gepp, S., Leetz, A., & Van De Pas, R. (2020). WHO should declare climate change a public health emergency. The BMJ , 368 , m797. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m797 · DOI
  18. Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Hellsten, I., & Marx, W. (2019). Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags. Journal of Informetrics , 13 (2), 695-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.008 · DOI
  19. Haustein, S. (2019). Scholarly Twitter metrics. In W. Glänzel, F. H. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 729-760). Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3\_28 · DOI
  20. Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2016). Interpreting 'altmetrics': Viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories. In C. R. Sugimoto (Ed.), Theories of Informetrics: A Festschrift in Honor of Blaise Cronin (pp. 372-405). Berlin : De Gruyter. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05701 · arXiv
  21. Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE , 10 (3), e0120495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120495 · DOI
  22. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2020). COVID-19 publications: Database coverage, citations, readers, tweets, news, Facebook walls, Reddit posts. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv: 2004.10400 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10400 · arXiv
  23. Liu, J., Cao, R., Xu, M., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Hu, H., Li, Y., Hu, Z., Zhong, W., & Wang, M. (2020). Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV2 infection in vitro. Cell Discovery , 6 (1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-0156-0 · DOI
  24. Lyu, X., & Costas, R. (2020). How do academic topics shift across altmetric sources? A case study of the research area of Big Data. Scientometrics , 123 (2), 909-943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192020-03415-7 · DOI
  25. Mallapaty, S. (2020). Animal source of the coronavirus continues to elude scientists. Nature . https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01449-8 · DOI
  26. McKee, M., & Stuckler, D. (2020). If the world fails to protect the economy, COVID-19 will damage health not just now but also in the future. Nature Medicine , 26 (5), 640-642. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0863-y · DOI
  27. Molina, J. M., Delaugerre, C., Le Goff, J., Mela-Lima, B., Ponscarme, D., Goldwirt, L., & de Castro, N. (2020). No evidence of rapid antiviral clearance or clinical benefit with the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. Medecine et Maladies Infectieuses , 50 (4), 384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2020.03.006 · DOI
  28. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 12 (85), 2825-2830. http://scikit-learn.sourceforge.net.
  29. Robinson-Garcia, N., Arroyo-Machado, W., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2019). Mapping social media attention in Microbiology: identifying main topics and actors. FEMS Microbiology Letters , 366 (7), fnz075. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz075 · DOI
  30. Robinson-Garcia, N., Costas, R., Isett, K., Melkers, J., & Hicks, D. (2017). The unbearable emptiness of tweeting-About journal articles. PLoS ONE , 12 (8), e0183551. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183551 · DOI
  31. Shuai, X., Pepe, A., & Bollen, J. (2012). How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations. PLoS ONE , 7 (11), e47523. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047523 · DOI
  32. Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology , 68 (9), 2037-2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833 · DOI
  33. Thelwall, M., & Thelwall, S. (2020). Retweeting for COVID-19: Consensus building, information sharing, dissent, and lockdown life. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv: 2004.02793 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.02793 · arXiv
  34. Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Castillo-Valdivieso, P. A. (2020). Open Access and Altmetrics in the pandemic age: Forescast analysis on COVID-19 related literature. BioRxiv , 2020.04.23.057307. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.057307 · DOI
  35. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics , 84 (2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-01463 · DOI
  36. Wang, L. L., Lo, K., Chandrasekhar, Y., Reas, R., Yang, J., Eide, D., Funk, K., Kinney, R., Liu, Z., Merrill, W., Mooney, P., Murdick, D., Rishi, D., Sheehan, J., Shen, Z., Stilson, B., Wade, A. D., Wang, K., Wilhelm, C., … Kohlmeier, S. (2020). CORD-19: The Covid-19 Open Research Dataset. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv: 2004.10706 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10706 · arXiv
  37. Wang, M., Cao, R., Zhang, L., Yang, X., Liu, J., Xu, M., Shi, Z., Hu, Z., Zhong, W., & Xiao, G. (2020). Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Research , 30 (3), 269-271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-02820 · DOI
  38. Wouters, P., Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2019). Social media metrics for new research evaluation. In W. Glänzel, F. H. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and
  39. Xie, B., He, D., Mercer, T., Wang, Y., Wu, D., Fleischmann, K. R., Zhang, Y., Yoder, L. H., Stephens, K. K., Mackert, M., & Lee, M. K. (2020). Global health crises are also information crises: A call to action. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology , asi.24357. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24357 · DOI
  40. Yammine, S. (2020). Going viral: how to boost the spread of coronavirus science on social media. Nature , 581 , 345-346. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01356-y · DOI
  41. Zhang, L., Zhao, W., Sun, B., Huang, Y., & Glänzel, W. (2020). How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: A global analysis of response patterns. Scientometrics . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341277375\_How\_scientific\_research\_reacts\_to\_interna tional\_public\_health\_emergencies\_a\_global\_analysis\_of\_response\_patterns

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, Z., & Costas, R.
ORCID
Fang, Zhichao
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2006.05783
arXiv
2006.05783
OpenAlex
W7093705041
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • Universiteit Leiden
  • Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • China Scholarship Council (201706060201)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, Twitter, social media attention, research attention, public engagement with science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review