Avoiding Side Effects in Complex Environments
Open accessAbstract
Reward function specification can be difficult. Rewarding the agent for making a widget may be easy, but penalizing the multitude of possible negative side effects is hard. In toy environments, Attainable Utility Preservation (AUP) avoided side effects by penalizing shifts in the ability to achieve randomly generated goals. We scale this approach to large, randomly generated environments based on Conway's Game of Life. By preserving optimal value for a single randomly generated reward function, AUP incurs modest overhead while leading the agent to complete the specified task and avoid many side effects. Videos and code are available at https://avoiding-side-effects.github.io/.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Challenge of Value Alignment: From Fairer Algorithms to AI Safety
Gabriel, I., & Ghazavi, V. (2022) · Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.18 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Calibrating Conservatism for Scalable Oversight
Overman, W., & Bayati, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.28807
“Attain-able Utility Preservation (AUP) (Turner et al., 2020a;b) generalizes this, penalizing actions that substantially change the agent’s ability to optimize auxiliary reward functions.”
Influential
- Authors
- Turner, A. M., Ratzlaff, N., & Tadepalli, P.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 33
- Pages
- 21406-21415
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2006.06547
- OpenAlex
- W3035015331
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- neural information processing systems
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1724360, 1619433)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001, N66001-19-2-4035, HR001120C0022, N66001-19)
- Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Keywords
- reward specification, Conway's Game of Life, reinforcement learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
