CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 706Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsStatistical Mechanics and EntropyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The entropy of Hawking radiation

Open access
Almheiri, Ahmed, Hartman, Thomas, Maldacena, Juan, Shaghoulian, Edgar, Tajdini, Amirhossein·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2006.06872arXiv 2006.06872
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this review, we describe recent progress on the black hole information problem that involves a new understanding of how to calculate the entropy of Hawking radiation. We show how the method for computing gravitational fine-grained entropy, developed over the past 15 years, can be extended to capture the entropy of Hawking radiation. This technique reveals large corrections needed for the entropy to be consistent with unitary black hole evaporation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2006.06872

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The island formula states that the true von Neumann entropy of region R is given not by Hawking's calculation but by an extremum of the generalized entropy.

    “The island formula [1,2,9,14,29] states that the true von Neumann entropy of region R is given not by Hawking's calculation, but by an extremum of the generalized entropy,”

    From Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole (2021) · cites this paper as [29]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. [3][3] G. Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox, 2019, [arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  2. [4][4] A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, 2019, [arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  3. [5][5] S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 181602, 2006, [arXiv:hep-th/0603001]. - · arXiv
  4. [6][6] V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 , 062, 2007, [arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  5. [7][7] A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 , 090, 2013, [arXiv:1304.4926 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  6. [8][8] T. Barrella, X. Dong, S. A. Hartnoll and V. L. Martin, Holographic entanglement beyond classical gravity, JHEP 09 , 109, 2013, [arXiv:1306.4682 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  7. [9][9] T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 , 074, 2013, [arXiv:1307.2892 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  8. [10][10] N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime, JHEP 01 , 073, 2015, [arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  9. [11][11] A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, 2019, [arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  10. [12][12] Y. Zhao, A quantum circuit interpretation of evaporating black hole geometry, 2019, [arXiv:1912.00909 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  11. [13][13] C. Akers, N. Engelhardt and D. Harlow, Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation, 2019, [arXiv:1910.00972 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  12. [14][14] M. Rozali, J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk, C. Waddell and D. Wakeham, Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes, 2019, [arXiv:1910.12836 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  13. [15][15] H. Z. Chen, Z. Fisher, J. Hernandez, R. C. Myers and S.-M. Ruan, Information Flow in Black Hole Evaporation, 2019, [arXiv:1911.03402 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  14. [16][16] R. Bousso and M. Tomasevic, Unitarity From a Smooth Horizon?, 2019, [arXiv:1911.06305 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  15. [17][17] A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, 2019, [arXiv:1911.09666 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  16. [18][18] Y. Chen, Pulling Out the Island with Modular Flow, JHEP 03 , 033, 2020, [arXiv:1912.02210 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  17. [19][19] A. Laddha, S. G. Prabhu, S. Raju and P. Shrivastava, The Holographic Nature of Null Infinity, 2020, [arXiv:2002.02448 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  18. [20][20] A. Mousatov and E. Silverstein, Recovering Infalling Information via String Spreading, 2020, [arXiv:2002.12377 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  19. [21][21] I. Kim, E. Tang and J. Preskill, The ghost in the radiation: Robust encodings of the black hole interior, 2020, [arXiv:2003.05451 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  20. [22][22] K. Saraswat and N. Afshordi, Extracting Hawking Radiation Near the Horizon of AdS Black Holes, 2020, [arXiv:2003.12676 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  21. [23][23] Y. Chen, X.-L. Qi and P. Zhang, Replica wormhole and information retrieval in the SYK model coupled to Majorana chains, 2020, [arXiv:2003.13147 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  22. [24][24] D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information, 2020, [arXiv:2002.08950 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  23. [25][25] H. Verlinde, ER = EPR revisited: On the Entropy of an Einstein-Rosen Bridge, 2020, [arXiv:2003.13117 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  24. [26][26] S. B. Giddings and G. J. Turiaci, Wormhole calculus, replicas, and entropies, 2020, [arXiv:2004.02900 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  25. [27][27] H. Liu and S. Vardhan, A dynamical mechanism for the Page curve from quantum chaos, 2020, [arXiv:2002.05734 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  26. [28][28] J. Pollack, M. Rozali, J. Sully and D. Wakeham, Eigenstate Thermalization and Disorder Averaging in Gravity, 2020, [arXiv:2002.02971 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  27. [29][29] V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar, O. Parrikar, G. Srosi and T. Ugajin, Geometric secret sharing in a model of Hawking radiation, 2020, [arXiv:2003.05448 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  28. [30][30] F. F. Gautason, L. Schneiderbauer, W. Sybesma and L. Thorlacius, Page Curve for an Evaporating Black Hole, 2020, [arXiv:2004.00598 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  29. [31][31] T. Anegawa and N. Iizuka, Notes on islands in asymptotically flat 2d dilaton black holes, 2020, [arXiv:2004.01601 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  30. [32][32] T. J. Hollowood and S. P. Kumar, Islands and Page Curves for Evaporating Black Holes in JT Gravity, 2020, [arXiv:2004.14944 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  31. [33][33] C. Krishnan, V. Patil and J. Pereira, Page Curve and the Information Paradox in Flat Space, 2020, [arXiv:2005.02993 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  32. [34][34] T. Banks, Microscopic Models of Linear Dilaton Gravity and Their Semi-classical Approximations, 2020, [arXiv:2005.09479 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  33. [35][35] H. Geng and A. Karch, Massive Islands, 2020, [arXiv:2006.02438 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  34. [42][42] S. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 , 199-220, 1975. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]. -
  35. [43][43] R. M. Wald, General Relativity . Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984, 10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001. - · DOI · Paper page
  36. [45][45] A. C. Wall, A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices, Phys. Rev. D 85 , 104049, 2012, [arXiv:1105.3445 [gr-qc]]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 069904 (2013)]. - · arXiv
  37. [52][52] A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B379 , 99-104, 1996, [arXiv:hep-th/9601029 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  38. [53][53] A. Dabholkar, J. Gomes and S. Murthy, Nonperturbative black hole entropy and Kloosterman sums, JHEP 03 , 074, 2015, [arXiv:1404.0033 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  39. [54][54] J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 , 1113-1133, 1999, [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]]. [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)]. - · arXiv
  40. [55][55] E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 , 253-291, 1998, [arXiv:hep-th/9802150 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  41. [56][56] S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B428 , 105-114, 1998, [arXiv:hep-th/9802109 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  42. [57][57] T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. Shenker and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A Conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55 , 5112-5128, 1997, [arXiv:hep-th/9610043]. - · arXiv
  43. [59][59] D. Christodoulou, The Formation of Black Holes in General Relativity, in 12th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity , pp. 24-34, 2008. [arXiv:0805.3880 [gr-qc]]. - · arXiv
  44. [60][60] D. N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 , 3743-3746, 1993, [arXiv:hep-th/9306083 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  45. [61][61] D. N. Page, Time Dependence of Hawking Radiation Entropy, JCAP 1309 , 028, 2013, [arXiv:1301.4995 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  46. [62][62] S. D. Mathur, The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 , 224001, 2009, [arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  47. [63][63] A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?, JHEP 02 , 062, 2013, [arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  48. [64][64] A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An Apologia for Firewalls, JHEP 09 , 018, 2013, [arXiv:1304.6483 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  49. [65][65] A. C. Wall, Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 , 225007, 2014, [arXiv:1211.3494 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  50. [66][66] C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, G. Penington and M. Usatyuk, Quantum Maximin Surfaces, 2019, [arXiv:1912.02799 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  51. [67][67] X. Dong and A. Lewkowycz, Entropy, Extremality, Euclidean Variations, and the Equations of Motion, JHEP 01 , 081, 2018, [arXiv:1705.08453 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  52. [68][68] P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 , 120, 2007, [arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  53. [69][69] Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast Scramblers, JHEP 10 , 065, 2008, [arXiv:0808.2096 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  54. [70][70] G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, 2019, [arXiv:1911.11977 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  55. [71][71] A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation, JHEP 05 , 013, 2020, [arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  56. [72][72] B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 , 155009, 2012, [arXiv:1204.1330 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  57. [73][73] M. Headrick, V. E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence and M. Rangamani, Causality & holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 12 , 162, 2014, [arXiv:1408.6300 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  58. [74][74] D. L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S. J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 , 004, 2016, [arXiv:1512.06431 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  59. [75][75] X. Dong, D. Harlow and A. C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 , 021601, 2016, [arXiv:1601.05416 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  60. [76][76] A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 , 163, 2015, [arXiv:1411.7041 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  61. [77][77] M. Ohya and D. Petz, Quantum Entropy and Its Use . Springer, New York, 2004. -
  62. [78][78] J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Penington, G. Salton, B. Swingle and M. Walter, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction via Universal Recovery Channels, Phys. Rev. X 9 , 031011, 2019, [arXiv:1704.05839 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  63. [79][79] A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, G. Penington and L. Susskind, The Python's Lunch: geometric obstructions to decoding Hawking radiation, 2019, [arXiv:1912.00228 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  64. [82][82] X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani, Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP 11 , 028, 2016, [arXiv:1607.07506 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  65. [83][83] E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 , 505-532, 1998, [arXiv:hep-th/9803131 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  66. [84][84] T. Hartman, E. Shaghoulian and A. Strominger, Islands in Asymptotically Flat 2D Gravity, 2020, [arXiv:2004.13857 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  67. [85][85] J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortsch. Phys. 61 , 781-811, 2013, [arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  68. [86][86] P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis and A. Wall, Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation, 2016, [arXiv:1608.05687 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  69. [87][87] P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, 2019, [arXiv:1903.11115 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  70. [88][88] L. Susskind, Three Lectures on Complexity and Black Holes, 2018. [arXiv:1810.11563 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  71. [90][90] J. M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 , 021, 2003, [arXiv:hep-th/0106112 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  72. [91][91] P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity, 2018, [arXiv:1806.06840 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  73. [92][92] P. Saad, Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity, 2019, [arXiv:1910.10311 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  74. [95][95] J. Polchinski and A. Strominger, A Possible resolution of the black hole information puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 50 , 7403-7409, 1994, [arXiv:hep-th/9407008]. - · arXiv
  75. [96][96] D. Marolf and A. C. Wall, Eternal Black Holes and Superselection in AdS/CFT, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 , 025001, 2013, [arXiv:1210.3590 [hep-th]]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
93
Issue
3
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2006.06872
arXiv
2006.06872
OpenAlex
W3034487792
Cited by
706
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 11
FWCI
31.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0020397, DESC0009988)
  • Simons Foundation (385600)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
Hawking radiation, black hole information paradox, black hole entropy, black hole evaporation, entropy correction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review