CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 12Space exploration and regulationDigitalization, Law, and RegulationArtificial Intelligence in Law

Artificial intelligence in space

Open access
Gal, George Anthony, Santos, Cristiana, Rapp, Lucien, Markovich, Réeka, van der Torre, Leendert·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2006.12362arXiv 2006.12362
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In the next coming years, space activities are expected to undergo a radical transformation with the emergence of new satellite systems or new services which will incorporate the contributions of artificial intelligence and machine learning defined as covering a wide range of innovations from autonomous objects with their own decision-making power to increasingly sophisticated services exploiting very large volumes of information from space. This chapter identifies some of the legal and ethical challenges linked to its use. These legal and ethical challenges call for solutions which the international treaties in force are not sufficient to determine and implement. For this reason, a legal methodology must be developed that makes it possible to link intelligent systems and services to a system of rules applicable thereto. It discusses existing legal AI-based tools amenable for making space law actionable, interoperable and machine readable for future compliance tools.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2006.12362

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agents, artificial or otherwise, could potentially perform criminal acts or omissions without satisfying the conditions of liability for that particular criminal offence.

    “This implies that agents, artificial or otherwise, could potentially perform criminal acts or omissions without satisfying the conditions of liability for that particular criminal offence [246].”

    From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [246]

  • Existing liability models may be inadequate to address the future role of AI in criminal activities.

    “Existing liability models may be inadequate to address the future role of AI in criminal activities [249].”

    From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [249]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gal, G. A., Santos, C., Rapp, L., Markovich, R., & van der Torre, L.
Affiliations
University of Luxembourg (LU)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2006.12362
arXiv
2006.12362
OpenAlex
W4287753819
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Strong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
Keywords
artificial intelligence in space, space law, machine learning, legal challenges of AI, ethical challenges of AI, international space treaties, compliance tools, interoperability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review