The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Memory-efficient Embedding for Recommendations
Open accessAbstract
Practical large-scale recommender systems usually contain thousands of feature fields from users, items, contextual information, and their interactions. Most of them empirically allocate a unified dimension to all feature fields, which is memory inefficient. Thus it is highly desired to assign different embedding dimensions to different feature fields according to their importance and predictability. Due to the large amounts of feature fields and the nuanced relationship between embedding dimensions with feature distributions and neural network architectures, manually allocating embedding dimensions in practical recommender systems can be very difficult. To this end, we propose an AutoML based framework (AutoDim) in this paper, which can automatically select dimensions for different feature fields in a data-driven fashion. Specifically, we first proposed an end-to-end differentiable framework that can calculate the weights over various dimensions for feature fields in a soft and continuous manner with an AutoML based optimization algorithm; then we derive a hard and discrete embedding component architecture according to the maximal weights and retrain the whole recommender framework. We conduct extensive experiments on benchmark datasets to validate the effectiveness of the AutoDim framework.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI long-term memory can enhance various domains such as content personalization and motion control.
“Beyond the two applications aforementioned, AI long-term memory can also enhance various domains such as content personalization (e.g. recommender systems [332, 258, 333]) and motion control (e.g. robotics [334, 335, 336]).”
From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [332]
Citations
Cites
MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobile
Tan, M., Chen, B., Pang, R., Vasudevan, V., Sandler, M., Howard, A., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00293 · Cited by 3,416
SNAS: Stochastic Neural Architecture Search
Xie, S., Zheng, H., Liu, C., & Lin, L. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.09926 · Cited by 731
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory
He, Z., Lin, W., Zheng, H., Zhang, F., Jones, M. W., Aitchison, L., Xu, X., Liu, M., Kristensson, P. O., & Shen, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00489 · Cited by 3
“Beyond the two applications aforementioned, AI long-term memory can also enhance various domains such as content personalization (e.g. recommender systems [325, 252, 326]) and motion control (e.g. robotics [327, 328, 329]).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X., Liu, H., Liu, H., Tang, J., Guo, W., Shi, J., Wang, S., Gao, H., & Long, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2006.14827
- OpenAlex
- W3038117087
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- recommender systems, feature embedding, memory efficiency, automated machine learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review