CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 17Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureRisk and Portfolio OptimizationFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Portfolio Optimization of 40 Stocks Using the DWave Quantum Annealer

Open access
Cohen, Jeffrey, Khan, Alex, Alexander, Clark·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2007.01430arXiv 2007.01430
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We investigate the use of quantum computers for building a portfolio out of a universe of U.S. listed, liquid equities that contains an optimal set of stocks. Starting from historical market data, we look at various problem formulations on the D-Wave Systems Inc. D-Wave 2000Q(TM) System (hereafter called DWave) to find the optimal risk vs return portfolio; an optimized portfolio based on the Markowitz formulation and the Sharpe ratio, a simplified Chicago Quantum Ratio (CQR), then a new Chicago Quantum Net Score (CQNS). We approach this first classically, then by our new method on DWave. Our results show that practitioners can use a DWave to select attractive portfolios out of 40 U.S. liquid equities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2007.01430

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1][1] N.Bekkers, R.Doeswijk, T.Lam, Strategic Asset Allocation: Determining the Optimal Portfolio with Ten Asset Classes https://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract\_id=1368689 Oct 20 09 -
  2. [4][4] G. Brinson, L.R. Hood, G. Beebower, Determinants of Portfolio Performance, June 1986, Financial Analysts Journal 42(4):39-44, DOI: 10.2469/ faj.v42.n4.39 -
  3. [5][5] G. Brinson, B. Singer, G. Beebower, Determinants of Portfolio Performance II: An Update, May/June 1991, Financial Analysts Journal pp.40 -
  4. [11][11] Harry Markowitz, Portfolio Selection, The Journal of Finance, 7,1 (1952), 77-91 -
  5. [12][12] Michael Marzec. Portfolio Optimization: Applications in Quantum Computing. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract\_id=2278729 -
  6. [13][13] Marcos Lopez de Prado, Ph.D., Machine Learning Asset Allocation, https: //ssrn.com/abstract=3469964 , Advanced in Financial Machine Learning, ORIE 5256 -
  7. [14][14] Nada Elsokkary, Faisal Shah Khan, Davide La Torre, Travis S. Humble, Joel Gottlieb. Financial Portfolio Management using D-Waves Quantum Optimizer: The Case of Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange. IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference, 2017 (edited) -
  8. [15][15] Bernard Pfaff, Financial Risk Modelling and Portfolio Optimization with R, second edition, Wiley, 2016. ISBN : 9781119119661 -
  9. [16][16] Michael Jensen, The Pricing of Capital Assets and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios, The Journal of Business, Vol. 42, No.2, (Apr., 1969), pp. 167 - 247 -
  10. [17][17] An Introduction to Information Geometry, https://arxiv.org/pdf/ 1808.08271.pdf -
  11. [18][18] Ors, Romn, Samuel Mugel, and Enrique Lizaso. Quantum computing for finance: overview and prospects. Reviews in Physics 4 (2019) (arXiv:1807.03890 [quant-ph]) - · arXiv
  12. [20][20] M. Rubenstein, Markowitz's Portfolio Selection: a Fifty-Year Retrospective, The Journal of Finance, Vol LVII, Num 3, June 2002, DOI:10.1.1.404.4279 -
  13. [22][22] William F. Sharpe, Stanford University, The Sharpe Ratio, The Journal of Portfolio Management, Fall 1994 http://web.stanford.edu/ ~ wfsharpe/ art/sr/sr.htm -
  14. [24][24] William F. Sharpe, Mutual Fund Performance , The Journal of B business, Vol 39, No.1, Part 2, Supplement on Security Prices. (Jan 1966), pp. 119 138 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2351741 -
  15. [26][26] D.Venturelli, A.Kondratyev, Reverse Quantum Annealing Approach to Portfolio Optimization Problems , arXiv:1810.08584, 2018 - · arXiv
  16. [27][27] X.Ye, L.Ning, J.Yang, D.Yao, Y.Hong, Research on three different Portfolio Models with singular Covariance Matrix IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) Volume 14, Issue 5 Ver. II (Sep - Oct 2018), PP 33-39 -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cohen, J., Khan, A., & Alexander, C.
ORCID
Khan, Alex
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2007.01430
arXiv
2007.01430
OpenAlex
W3040431597
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
portfolio optimization, quantum annealing, D-Wave 2000Q, Markowitz mean-variance model, Sharpe ratio, risk-return tradeoff, quantum computing in finance, stock selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review