The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Combining Differentiable PDE Solvers and Graph Neural Networks for Fluid Flow Prediction
Open accessAbstract
Solving large complex partial differential equations (PDEs), such as those that arise in computational fluid dynamics (CFD), is a computationally expensive process. This has motivated the use of deep learning approaches to approximate the PDE solutions, yet the simulation results predicted from these approaches typically do not generalize well to truly novel scenarios. In this work, we develop a hybrid (graph) neural network that combines a traditional graph convolutional network with an embedded differentiable fluid dynamics simulator inside the network itself. By combining an actual CFD simulator (run on a much coarser resolution representation of the problem) with the graph network, we show that we can both generalize well to new situations and benefit from the substantial speedup of neural network CFD predictions, while also substantially outperforming the coarse CFD simulation alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are fewer studies on calibration of modern NNs, DLs and many more ML methods.
“However, we noticed that there are less studies on calibration of modern NNs, DLs and many more ML methods [411], [602], [604], [605], [606], [607].”
From A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [411]
The Introduction (p. 1) and Related Work (p. 2) discuss deep-learning methods for fluid-flow prediction, not the amount of research on calibration. Searches for “calibration” and “few studies on calibration” found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Afshar, Y., Bhatnagar, S., Pan, S., Duraisamy, K., and Kaushik, S. Prediction of Aerodynamic Flow Fields Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Computational Mechanics , 64(2):525-545, August 2019. ISSN 01787675, 1432-0924. doi: 10.1007/s00466-019-01740-0. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13166 . · DOI
- Albring, T., Sagebaum, M., and Gauger, N. R. Development of a consistent discrete adjoint solver in an evolving aerodynamic design framework. AIAA Paper 2015-3240 , 2015. doi: 10.2514/6.2015-3240. · DOI
- Albring, T., Sagebaum, M., and Gauger, N. Efficient aerodynamic design using the discrete adjoint method in SU2. AIAA Paper 2016-3518 , 2016. doi: 10.2514/6.2016-3518. · DOI
- Alet, F., Jeewajee, A. K., Bauza, M., Rodriguez, A., LozanoPerez, T., and Kaelbling, L. P. Graph Element Networks: adaptive, structured computation and memory. arXiv:1904.09019 [cs, stat] , November 2019. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09019 . arXiv: 1904.09019. · arXiv
- Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A., and Vandergheynst, P. Geometric deep learning: going beyond euclidean data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , 34(4): 18-42, 2017.
- Defferrard, M., Bresson, X., and Vandergheynst, P. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 3844-3852, 2016.
- Duraisamy, K., Iaccarino, G., and Xiao, H. Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics , 51(1):357-377, January 2019. ISSN 0066-4189, 1545-4479. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.00183 . · DOI
- Economon, T. D., Palacios, F., and Alonso, J. J. Unsteady continuous adjoint approach for aerodynamic design on dynamic meshes. AIAA Journal , 53(9):2437-2453, 2015a. doi: 10.2514/1.J053763. · DOI
- (3):828-846, December 2015b. ISSN 0001-1452. doi: 10. 2514/1.J053813. URL https://arc.aiaa.org/ doi/10.2514/1.J053813 . · DOI
- Economon, T. D., Palacios, F., Copeland, S. R., Lukaczyk, T. W., and Alonso, J. J. SU2: An open-source suite for multiphysics simulation and design. AIAA Journal , 54 (3):828-846, 2016. doi: 10.2514/1.J053813. · DOI
- Guo, X., Li, W., and Iorio, F. Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , pp. 481-490, 2016.
- Hamilton, W., Ying, Z., and Leskovec, J. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 1024-1034, 2017.
- Hanocka, R., Hertz, A., Fish, N., Giryes, R., Fleishman, S., and Cohen-Or, D. Meshcnn: a network with an edge. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , 38(4):1-12, 2019.
- Jameson, A. Aerodynamic design via control theory. Journal of Scientific Computing , 3:233-260, 1988. doi: 10.1007/BF01061285. · DOI
- Kim, B., Azevedo, V. C., Thuerey, N., Kim, T., Gross, M., and Solenthaler, B. Deep Fluids: A Generative Network for Parameterized Fluid Simulations. arXiv:1806.02071 [physics, stat] , June 2018. URL http://arxiv. org/abs/1806.02071 . · arXiv
- King, R., Hennigh, O., Mohan, A., and Chertkov, M. From Deep to Physics-Informed Learning of Turbulence: Diagnostics. arXiv:1810.07785 [nlin, physics:physics, stat] , October 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1810.07785 . · arXiv
- Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 , 2014. · arXiv
- Kipf, T. N. and Welling, M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 , 2016. · arXiv
- Macklin, M. and Mller, M. Position based fluids. ACM Transactions on Graphics , 32(4):1, July 2013. ISSN 07300301. doi: 10.1145/2461912. 2461984. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?doid=2461912.2461984 . · DOI
- McNamara, A., Treuille, A., Popovic, Z., and Stam, J. Fluid control using the adjoint method. ACM Transactions On Graphics (TOG) , 23(3):449-456, 2004.
- Qi, C. R., Yi, L., Su, H., and Guibas, L. J. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 5099-5108, 2017.
- Schenck, C. and Fox, D. SPNets: Differentiable Fluid Dynamics for Deep Neural Networks. June 2018. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.06094v2 . · arXiv
- Singh, A. P., Duraisamy, K., and Zhang, Z. J. Augmentation of Turbulence Models Using Field Inversion and Machine Learning. In 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting . American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-0993. URL https://arc. aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2017-0993 . · DOI
- Um, K., Hu, X., and Thuerey, N. Liquid Splash Modeling with Neural Networks. arXiv:1704.04456 [cs] , April 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1704. 04456 . · arXiv
- Wiewel, S., Becher, M., and Thuerey, N. Latent-space Physics: Towards Learning the Temporal Evolution of Fluid Flow. arXiv:1802.10123 [cs] , February 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.10123 . · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111
Metadata
- Authors
- Belbute-Peres, F. D. A., Economon, T. D., & Kolter, J. Z.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 2402-2411
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2007.04439
- OpenAlex
- W3035431334
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 29 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Machine Learning
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- graph neural networks, graph convolutional networks, fluid flow prediction, computational fluid dynamics, hybrid neural network, physics-informed deep learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
