CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 6Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Gate-free state preparation for fast variational quantum eigensolver simulations: ctrl-VQE

Open access
Meitei, Oinam Romesh, Gard, Bryan T., Barron, George S., Pappas, David P., Economou, Sophia E., Barnes, Edwin, Mayhall, Nicholas J.·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2008.04302arXiv 2008.04302
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) is currently the flagship algorithm for solving electronic structure problems on near-term quantum computers. This hybrid quantum/classical algorithm involves implementing a sequence of parameterized gates on quantum hardware to generate a target quantum state, and then measuring the expectation value of the molecular Hamiltonian. Due to finite coherence times and frequent gate errors, the number of gates that can be implemented remains limited on current quantum devices, preventing accurate applications to systems with significant entanglement, such as strongly correlated molecules. In this work, we propose an alternative algorithm (which we refer to as ctrl-VQE) where the quantum circuit used for state preparation is removed entirely and replaced by a quantum control routine which variationally shapes a pulse to drive the initial Hartree-Fock state to the full CI target state. As with VQE, the objective function optimized is the expectation value of the qubit-mapped molecular Hamiltonian. However, by removing the quantum circuit, the coherence times required for state preparation can be drastically reduced by directly optimizing the pulses. We demonstrate the potential of this method numerically by directly optimizing pulse shapes which accurately model the dissociation curves of the hydrogen molecule (covalent bond) and helium hydride ion (ionic bond), and we compute the single point energy for LiH with four transmons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2008.04302

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concepts of analog quantum simulation have been used within VQA, such as problem-inspired ansätze or protocols inspired by quantum control.

    “Concepts of analog quantum simulation have been used within VQA as well, such as problem inspired ansätze (see Sec. II.B.1) or protocols inspired by quantum control (Meitei et al. , 2020; Yang et al. , 2017).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Meitei et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 9 J. B. Schriber and F. A. Evangelista, The Journal of Chemical Physics 144 , 161106 (2016).
  2. 10 A. A. Holmes, N. M. Tubman, and C. J. Umrigar, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 12 , 3674 (2016).
  3. (American Chemical Society, 2016), vol. 1234 of ACS Symposium Series, chap. 2, pp. 15-46, ISBN 978-0-8412-3179-5.
  4. 16 K. Sharma, S. Khatri, M. Cerezo, and P. J. Coles, New Journal of Physics 22 , 043006 (2020), URL https://doi. org/10.1088%2F1367-2630%2Fab784c . · DOI · Paper page
  5. 17 A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Nature 549 , 242 (2017), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature23879 .
  6. 18 W. J. Huggins, J. Lee, U. Baek, B. O'Gorman, and K. B. Whaley, arXiv:1909.09114 [physics, physics:quantph] (2019), 1909.09114. · arXiv
  7. 21 G. S. Barron, B. T. Gard, O. J. Altman, N. J. Mayhall, E. Barnes, and S. E. Economou, arXiv:2003.00171 [quantph] (2020). · arXiv
  8. 24 H. L. Tang, V. O. Shkolnikov, G. S. Barron, H. R. Grimsley, N. J. Mayhall, E. Barnes, and S. E. Economou, arXiv:1911.10205 [quant-ph] (2020), 1911.10205. · arXiv
  9. 26 W. Jordan, P., Z. Physik 47 , 631 (1928), URL https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF01331938 . · DOI · Paper page
  10. 27 S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. 298 , 210 (2002), URL https://doi.org/10.1006/aphy.2002.6254 . · DOI · Paper page
  11. 28 J. T. Seeley, M. J. Richard, and P. J. Love, The Journal of Chemical Physics 137 , 224109 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4768229, URL https://doi. org/10.1063/1.4768229 . · DOI · Paper page
  12. 29 R. J. Bartlett and M. Musiaglyph[suppress] l, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 , 291 (2007), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.79.291 .
  13. 31 M. Ostaszewski, E. Grant, and M. Benedetti, arXiv:1905.09692 [quant-ph] (2019), 1905.09692. · arXiv
  14. 32 D. Chivilikhin, A. Samarin, V. Ulyantsev, I. Iorsh, A. R. Oganov, and O. Kyriienko, arXiv:2007.04424 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph] (2020), 2007.04424. · arXiv
  15. 33 Y. Matsuzawa and Y. Kurashige, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 16 , 944 (2020).
  16. 34 W. J. Huggins, J. Lee, U. Baek, B. O'Gorman, and K. B. Whaley, arXiv:1909.09114 [physics, physics:quantph] (2019), 1909.09114. · arXiv
  17. 36 R. Babbush, N. Wiebe, J. McClean, J. McClain, H. Neven, and G. K.-L. Chan, Physical Review X 8 , 011044 (2018).
  18. 37 V. Verteletskyi, T.-C. Yen, and A. F. Izmaylov, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152 , 124114 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141458, URL https://doi. org/10.1063/1.5141458 . · DOI · Paper page
  19. 38 W. J. Huggins, J. McClean, N. Rubin, Z. Jiang, N. Wiebe, K. B. Whaley, and R. Babbush, arXiv:1907.13117 [physics, physics:quant-ph] (2019), 1907.13117. · arXiv
  20. 39 A. Zhao, A. Tranter, W. M. Kirby, S. F. Ung, A. Miyake, and P. J. Love, Phys. Rev. A 101 , 062322 (2020), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.101.062322 .
  21. 41 S. Deffner and S. Campbell, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 , 453001 (2017), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1751-8121/aa86c6 .
  22. 42 H. S. Ku, J. L. Long, X. Wu, M. Bal, R. E. Lake, E. Barnes, S. E. Economou, and D. P. Pappas, Phys. Rev. A 96 , 042339 (2017), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.042339 . · DOI
  23. 43 A. Choquette, A. Di Paolo, P. K. Barkoutsos, D. S´ en´ echal, I. Tavernelli, and A. Blais, arXiv:2008.01098 [quant-ph] (2020), 2008.01098. · arXiv
  24. 46 J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Computer Physics Communications 184 , 1234 (2013), ISSN 00104655, URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0010465512003955 .
  25. 47 Q. Sun, T. C. Berkelbach, N. S. Blunt, G. H. Booth, S. Guo, Z. Li, J. Liu, J. D. McClain, E. R. Sayfutyarova, S. Sharma, et al., WIREs Computational Molecular Science 8 , e1340 (2018), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1340, URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/wcms.1340 . · DOI
  26. 49 Y. Shen, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, J.-N. Zhang, M.-H. Yung, and K. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 95 , 020501 (2017), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.020501 . · DOI
  27. 50 J. I. Colless, V. V. Ramasesh, D. Dahlen, M. S. Blok, M. E. Kimchi-Schwartz, J. R. McClean, J. Carter, W. A. de Jong, and I. Siddiqi, Phys. Rev. X 8 , 011021 (2018), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.011021 . · DOI · Paper page
  28. 52 R. Xia, T. Bian, and S. Kais, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 122 , 3384 (2018), pMID: 29099600, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b10371, URL https:// doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b10371 . · DOI
  29. 53 C. Hempel, C. Maier, J. Romero, J. McClean, T. Monz, H. Shen, P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Love, R. Babbush, et al., Phys. Rev. X 8 , 031022 (2018), URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031022 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031022 · DOI
  30. 54 K. Sugisaki, S. Nakazawa, K. Toyota, K. Sato, D. Shiomi, and T. Takui, ACS Central Science 5 , 167 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00788, URL https: //doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00788 . · DOI
  31. 55 M. B. Ritter, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1290 , 012003 (2019), URL https://doi.org/10.1088% 2F1742-6596%2F1290%2F1%2F012003 .
  32. 56 R. Sagastizabal, X. Bonet-Monroig, M. Singh, M. A. Rol, C. C. Bultink, X. Fu, C. H. Price, V. P. Ostroukh, N. Muthusubramanian, A. Bruno, et al., Phys. Rev. A 100 , 010302 (2019), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.010302 . · DOI
  33. 58 S. Bravyi, J. M. Gambetta, A. Mezzacapo, and K. Temme, arXiv:1701.08213 [quant-ph] (2017). · arXiv
  34. 60 N. Khaneja, T. Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. SchulteHerbr¨ uggen, and S. J. Glaser, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 172 , 296 (2005), ISSN 1090-7807, URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1090780704003696 .
  35. 61 P. Gokhale, Y. Ding, T. Propson, C. Winkler, N. Leung, Y. Shi, D. I. Schuster, H. Hoffmann, and F. T. Chong, Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (2019), URL http://dx. doi.org/10.1145/3352460.3358313 . · DOI
  36. 62 S. Boutin, C. K. Andersen, J. Venkatraman, A. J. Ferris, and A. Blais, Phys. Rev. A 96 , 042315 (2017), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.042315 . · DOI
  37. 64 T. Gradl, A. Sp¨ orl, T. Huckle, S. J. Glaser, and T. SchulteHerbr¨ uggen, in Euro-Par 2006 Parallel Processing, edited by W. E. Nagel, W. V. Walter, and W. Lehner (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006), pp. 751-762, ISBN 978-3-540-37784-9.
  38. 65 J. Cheng, H. Deng, and X. Qia, in 2020 ACM/IEEE 47th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) (2020), pp. 543-555.
  39. 66 C. P. Williams, Explorations in Quantum Computing (Springer, 2010).
  40. 67 S. E. Economou and E. Barnes, Phys. Rev. B 91 , 161405 (2015), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.91.161405 .
  41. 68 G. S. Barron, F. A. Calderon-Vargas, J. Long, D. P. Pappas, and S. E. Economou, Phys. Rev. B 101 , 054508 (2020), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.101.054508 .
  42. 69 H. Ball, M. J. Biercuk, A. Carvalho, J. Chen, M. Hush, L. A. De Castro, L. Li, P. J. Liebermann, H. J. Slatyer, C. Edmunds, et al., arXiv:2001.04060 [quant-ph] (2020), 2001.04060. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Meitei, O. R., Gard, B. T., Barron, G. S., Pappas, D. P., Economou, S. E., Barnes, E., & Mayhall, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2008.04302
arXiv
2008.04302
OpenAlex
W3048351281
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing, University of California Berkeley
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
variational quantum eigensolver, quantum control, pulse shaping, electronic structure, Hartree-Fock states, full configuration interaction, molecular Hamiltonian, coherence time, gate errors, molecular hydrogen, HeH+, lithium hydride, transmon qubits, strongly correlated molecules

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review