SafetyOps
Open accessAbstract
Safety assurance is a paramount factor in the large-scale deployment of various autonomous systems (e.g., self-driving vehicles). However, the execution of safety engineering practices and processes have been challenged by an increasing complexity of modern safety-critical systems. This attribute has become more critical for autonomous systems that involve artificial intelligence (AI) and data-driven techniques along with the complex interactions of the physical world and digital computing platforms. In this position paper, we highlight some challenges of applying current safety processes to modern autonomous systems. Then, we introduce the concept of SafetyOps - a set of practices, which combines DevOps, TestOps, DataOps, and MLOps to provide an efficient, continuous and traceable system safety lifecycle. We believe that SafetyOps can play a significant role in scalable integration and adaptation of safety engineering into various industries relying on AI and data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differential privacy has been explored in various data publishing tasks, such as log data, set-valued data, correlated network data, and crowdsourced data.
“DP has been explored in various data publishing tasks, such as log data [159, 385], set-valued data [75], correlated network data [74], and crowdsourced data [344, 278].”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
The citation is attached to the claim about differential privacy and crowdsourced data. The SafetyOps passages in §2 (Challenges) and §3 (Principles of SafetyOps) discuss safety analysis and data management, but do not address differential privacy or crowdsourced-data publishing. Searches for those terms and the other listed publishing tasks found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- J. Davis and K. Daniels. 2016. Effective DevOps: Building a Culture of Collaboration, Affinity, and Tooling at Scale (1st ed.). OfiReilly.
- E. Denney, G. Pai, and I. Habli. 2015. Dynamic Safety Cases for rough-Life Safety Assurance. In IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on So ware Engineering, Vol. 2. 587-590.
- E. Denney, G. Pai, and I. Whiteside. 2015. Formal Foundations for Hierarchical Safety Cases. In EEE 16th International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering. 52-59.
- IEC61508. 2010. Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/ and Pro- grammable Electronic (Edition 2).
- Philip Koopman, Beth Osyk, and Jack Weast. 2019. Autonomous Vehicles Meet the Physical World: RSS, Variability, Uncertainty, and Proving Safety (Expanded Version). arXiv:cs.RO/1911.01207
- P. Koopman and M. Wagner. 2016. Challenges in Autonomous Vehicle Testing and Validation. SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety 4, 1 (2016), 15-24.
- M. Nauta, D. Bucur, and M. Stoelinga. 2018. LIFT: Learning Fault Trees from Observational Data. In antitative Evaluation of Systems QEST (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 11024. Springer, 306-322.
- S. Riedmaier, T. Ponn, D. Ludwig, B. Schick, and F. Diermeyer. 2020. Survey on Scenario-based Safety Assessment of Automated Vehicles. IEEE Access (2020), 1-26.
- R. Salay, M. Angus, and K. Czarnecki. 2019. A Safety Analysis Method for Perceptual Components in Automated Driving. In 2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on So ware Reliability Engineering. 24-34.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices
Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555803 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
- Authors
- Siddique, U.
- Affiliations
- Robert Bosch (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Siddique, Umair
- ORCID
- Siddique, Umair
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2008.04461
- OpenAlex
- W4293849182
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- safety assurance, autonomous systems, safety engineering, DevOps, DataOps, MLOps, safety lifecycle, AI safety, autonomous vehicles, safety-critical systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
