Fully-programmable universal quantum simulator with a one-dimensional quantum processor
Open accessAbstract
Current quantum devices execute specific tasks that are hard for classical computers and have the potential to solve problems such as quantum simulation of material science and chemistry, even without error correction. For practical applications it is highly desirable to reconfigure the connectivity of the device, which for superconducting quantum processors is determined at fabrication. In addition, we require a careful design of control lines and couplings to resonators for measurements. Therefore, it is a cumbersome and slow undertaking to fabricate a new device for each problem we want to solve. Here we periodically drive a one-dimensional chain to engineer effective Hamiltonians that simulate arbitrary connectivities. We demonstrate the capability of our method by engineering driving sequences to simulate star, all-to-all, and ring connectivities. We also simulate a minimal example of the 3-SAT problem including three-body interactions, which are difficult to realize experimentally. Our results open a new paradigm to perform quantum simulation in near term quantum devices by enabling us to stroboscopically simulate arbitrary Hamiltonians with a single device and optimized driving sequences
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An analog quantum system, such as a superconducting circuit, can be adapted to simulate arbitrary dynamics.
“An analog quantum system, such as a superconducting circuit, can be adapted to simulate arbitrary dynamics (Bastidas et al. , 2020).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Bastidas et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- D. I. Schuster, Nature 566 , 51 (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0897-9 · DOI · Paper page
- [12]B. Chiaro, C. Neill, A. Bohrdt, M. Filippone, F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. Bardin, R. Barends, et al. , arXiv:1910.06024 (2019). · arXiv
- [21]C. Zha, V. M. Bastidas, M. Gong, Y. Wu, H. Rong, R. Yang, Y. Ye, S. Li, Q. Zhu, S. Wang, et al. , arXiv:2001.09169 (2020). · arXiv
- [27]A. Eckardt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 , 011004 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.011004 · DOI
- [35]T. Haug, W.-K. Mok, J.-B. You, W. Zhang, C. Eng Png, and L.-C. Kwek, arXiv:2005.12759 (2020). · arXiv
- [36]M. Bukov, Phys. Rev. B 98 , 224305 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.224305 · DOI
- [37]T. Haug, R. Dumke, L.-C. Kwek, C. Miniatura, and L. Amico, arXiv:1911.09578 (2019). · arXiv
- [39]N. Nagaosa, Quantum field theory in strongly correlated electronic systems (Springer Science & Business Media, 1999).
- [40]D. A. Battaglia, G. E. Santoro, and E. Tosatti, Physical Review E 71 , 066707 (2005).
- [42]G. L. Mullen and D. Panario, Handbook of finite fields (CRC Press, 2013).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bastidas, V. M., Haug, T., Gravel, C., Kwek, L. C., Munro, W. J., & Nemoto, K.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2009.00823
- OpenAlex
- W6929461616
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- periodic driving, all-to-all connectivity, 3-SAT, three-body interactions, superconducting qubits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
