Phasic Policy Gradient
Open accessAbstract
We introduce Phasic Policy Gradient (PPG), a reinforcement learning framework which modifies traditional on-policy actor-critic methods by separating policy and value function training into distinct phases. In prior methods, one must choose between using a shared network or separate networks to represent the policy and value function. Using separate networks avoids interference between objectives, while using a shared network allows useful features to be shared. PPG is able to achieve the best of both worlds by splitting optimization into two phases, one that advances training and one that distills features. PPG also enables the value function to be more aggressively optimized with a higher level of sample reuse. Compared to PPO, we find that PPG significantly improves sample efficiency on the challenging Procgen Benchmark.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Within the budget of 50M frames, Dreamer matches the tuned expert algorithm PPG and outperforms Rainbow on ProcGen.
“Within the budget of 50M frames, Dreamer matches the tuned expert algorithm PPG 37 and outperforms Rainbow 42,40 .”
From Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
We compare ProcGen at 50M steps due to computational cost, as there is no action repeat.
“Prior work compares at different step budgets 42,37 and we compare at 50M steps due to computational cost, as there is no action repeat.”
From Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 83
- Authors
- Cobbe, K., Hilton, J., Klimov, O., & Schulman, J.
- Affiliations
- OpenAI (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 2020-2027
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2009.04416
- OpenAlex
- W3169036355
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Machine Learning
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Keywords
- actor-critic, on-policy learning, shared networks, feature distillation, sample efficiency, sample reuse, proximal policy optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
