Efficient Transformers: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
Transformer model architectures have garnered immense interest lately due to their effectiveness across a range of domains like language, vision and reinforcement learning. In the field of natural language processing for example, Transformers have become an indispensable staple in the modern deep learning stack. Recently, a dizzying number of "X-former" models have been proposed - Reformer, Linformer, Performer, Longformer, to name a few - which improve upon the original Transformer architecture, many of which make improvements around computational and memory efficiency. With the aim of helping the avid researcher navigate this flurry, this paper characterizes a large and thoughtful selection of recent efficiency-flavored "X-former" models, providing an organized and comprehensive overview of existing work and models across multiple domains.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tay et al. limit their coverage to architectural innovations for minimizing computation overheads, e.g., minimizing quadratic complexity, parameter sharing for low model size, and methods related to sparsity and pooling.
“Tay et al. [55] limit their coverage to architectural innovations for minimizing computation overheads, e.g., minimizing the quadratic complexity, parameter sharing for low model size, and methods related to sparsity and pooling.”
From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 98 · Cited by 1,267
- Authors
- Tay, Y., Dehghani, M., Bahri, D., & Metzler, D.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-28
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2009.06732
- OpenAlex
- W3085139254
- Cited by
- 1,267
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 240 · 2025: 288 · 2024: 192 · 2023: 258 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 71.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- transformer models, efficient transformers, reformers, Linformer, performers, Longformer, computational efficiency, memory efficiency, natural language processing, vision transformer, reinforcement learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
