The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clova Baseline System for the VoxCeleb Speaker Recognition Challenge 2020
Open accessAbstract
This report describes our submission to the VoxCeleb Speaker Recognition Challenge (VoxSRC) at Interspeech 2020. We perform a careful analysis of speaker recognition models based on the popular ResNet architecture, and train a number of variants using a range of loss functions. Our results show significant improvements over most existing works without the use of model ensemble or post-processing. We release the training code and pre-trained models as unofficial baselines for this year's challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Noise is a serious issue for audio-based speaker verification.
“Moreover, noise is a serious issue also for audio-based speaker verification [26].”
From Audio-Visual Person-of-Interest DeepFake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
Section 3.2 (p. 2) describes adding speech, music, and background noise when training the speaker-recognition system, so the paper treats noise as a relevant concern. It does not say that noise is a serious issue for speaker verification or show how much it affects verification performance. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition
Deng, J., Guo, J., Xue, N., & Zafeiriou, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00482 · Cited by 7,781
CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognition
Wang, H., Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., Ji, X., Gong, D., Zhou, J., Li, Z., & Liu, W. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00552 · Cited by 3,034
VoxCeleb2: Deep Speaker Recognition
Chung, J. S., Nagrani, A., & Zisserman, A. (2018) · Interspeech 2018 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2018-1929 · Cited by 2,256
Self-citationAttentive Statistics Pooling for Deep Speaker Embedding
Okabe, K., Koshinaka, T., & Shinoda, K. (2018) · Interspeech 2018 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2018-993 · Cited by 514 · cited 5×
“We refer to this configuration as H / ASP in the results.”
MethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- [1][1] D. Ulyanov, A. Vedaldi, and V. Lempitsky, 'Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.08022 , 2016. - · arXiv
- [5][5] W. Xie, A. Nagrani, J. S. Chung, and A. Zisserman, 'Utterancelevel aggregation for speaker recognition in the wild,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2019. -
- [7][7] J. S. Chung, J. Huh, S. Mun, M. Lee, H. S. Heo, S. Choe, C. Ham, S. Jung, B.-J. Lee, and I. Han, 'In defence of metric learning for speaker recognition,' in Proc. Interspeech , 2020. -
- [9][9] H. Zeinali, S. Wang, A. Silnova, P. Matˇ ejka, and O. Plchot, 'BUT system description to voxceleb speaker recognition challenge 2019,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12592 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [10][10] D. Garcia-Romero, A. McCree, D. Snyder, and G. Sell, 'JHUHLTCOE system for the VoxSRC speaker recognition challenge,' in Proc. ICASSP . IEEE, 2020, pp. 7559-7563. -
- [13][13] X. Xiang, S. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Qian, and K. Yu, 'Margin matters: Towards more discriminative deep neural network embeddings for speaker recognition,' in Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference . IEEE, 2019, pp. 1652-1656. -
- [14][14] A. Nagrani, J. S. Chung, and A. Zisserman, 'VoxCeleb: a largescale speaker identification dataset,' in Proc. Interspeech , 2017. -
- [15][15] J. S. Chung, A. Nagrani, E. Coto, W. Xie, M. McLaren, D. A. Reynolds, and A. Zisserman, 'VoxSRC 2019: The first VoxCeleb speaker recognition challenge,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.02522 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [16][16] D. Snyder, G. Chen, and D. Povey, 'Musan: A music, speech, and noise corpus,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.08484 , 2015. - · arXiv
- [17][17] T. Ko, V. Peddinti, D. Povey, M. L. Seltzer, and S. Khudanpur, 'A study on data augmentation of reverberant speech for robust speech recognition,' in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing , 2017, pp. 5220-5224. -
- [18][18] D. Snyder, D. Garcia-Romero, G. Sell, D. Povey, and S. Khudanpur, 'X-vectors: Robust dnn embeddings for speaker recognition,' in Proc. ICASSP . IEEE, 2018, pp. 5329-5333. -
- [19][19] A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga et al. , 'Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library,' in NIPS , 2019, pp. 8024-8035. -
- [20][20] N. Sung, M. Kim, H. Jo, Y. Yang, J. Kim, L. Lausen, Y. Kim, G. Lee, D. Kwak, J.-W. Ha et al. , 'Nsml: A machine learning platform that enables you to focus on your models,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05902 , 2017. - · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Audio-Visual Person-of-Interest DeepFake Detection
Cozzolino, D., Pianese, A., Nießner, M., & Verdoliva, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00101 · Cited by 104
AntiFake: Using Adversarial Audio to Prevent Unauthorized Speech Synthesis
Yu, Z., Zhai, S., & Zhang, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3576915.3623209 · Cited by 44
Wang, X., Delgado, H., Tak, H., Jung, J.-W., Shim, H.-J., Todisco, M., Kukanov, I., Liu, X., Sahidullah, M., Kinnunen, T., et al. (2026) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2025.101825 · Cited by 30
“Different to A14, also based upon YourTTS, is use of an H/ASP-based speaker encoder [100] pre-trained using the VoxCeleb 2 database [91].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Heo, H. S., Lee, B.-J., Huh, J., & Chung, J. S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2009.14153
- OpenAlex
- W3090254849
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- speaker recognition, VoxCeleb, ResNet, loss functions, speaker verification, speaker identification, pre-trained models, baselines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
