PreprintCited by 51Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

BYOL works even without batch statistics

Open access
Richemond, Pierre H., Grill, Jean-Bastien, Altché, Florent, Tallec, Corentin, Strub, Florian, Brock, Andrew, Smith, Samuel, De, Soham +3 more·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL) is a self-supervised learning approach for image representation. From an augmented view of an image, BYOL trains an online network to predict a target network representation of a different augmented view of the same image. Unlike contrastive methods, BYOL does not explicitly use a repulsion term built from negative pairs in its training objective. Yet, it avoids collapse to a trivial, constant representation. Thus, it has recently been hypothesized that batch normalization (BN) is critical to prevent collapse in BYOL. Indeed, BN flows gradients across batch elements, and could leak information about negative views in the batch, which could act as an implicit negative (contrastive) term. However, we experimentally show that replacing BN with a batch-independent normalization scheme (namely, a combination of group normalization and weight standardization) achieves performance comparable to vanilla BYOL ($73.9\%$ vs. $74.3\%$ top-1 accuracy under the linear evaluation protocol on ImageNet with ResNet-$50$). Our finding disproves the hypothesis that the use of batch statistics is a crucial ingredient for BYOL to learn useful representations.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2010.10241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DINO is flexible and works on both convnets and ViTs without the need to modify the architecture, nor adapt internal normalizations.

    “Of particular importance, our framework is flexible and works on both convnets and ViTs without the need to modify the architecture, nor adapt internal normalizations [58].”

    From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [58]

  • DINO's method can be interpreted as applying Polyak-Ruppert averaging during training to constantly build a model ensembling that has superior performances, and this model ensembling guides the training of the student network.

    “Our method can be interpreted as applying Polyak-Ruppert averaging during the training to constantly build a model ensembling that has superior performances. This model ensembling then guides the training of the student network [65].”

    From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

  • The fact that the teacher continually outperforms the student further encourages the interpretation of DINO as a form of Mean Teacher self-distillation.

    “The fact that the teacher continually outperforms the student further encourages the interpretation of DINO as a form of Mean Teacher [65] self-distillation.”

    From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richemond, P. H., Grill, J.-B., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Strub, F., Brock, A., Smith, S., De, S., Pascanu, R., Piot, B., & Valko, M.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093929102
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • DeepMind
  • LOEWE Zentrum AdRIA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
BYOL, self-supervised learning, batch normalization, group normalization, weight standardization, representation collapse, image representation learning, contrastive learning, ImageNet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review