BYOL works even without batch statistics
Open accessAbstract
Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL) is a self-supervised learning approach for image representation. From an augmented view of an image, BYOL trains an online network to predict a target network representation of a different augmented view of the same image. Unlike contrastive methods, BYOL does not explicitly use a repulsion term built from negative pairs in its training objective. Yet, it avoids collapse to a trivial, constant representation. Thus, it has recently been hypothesized that batch normalization (BN) is critical to prevent collapse in BYOL. Indeed, BN flows gradients across batch elements, and could leak information about negative views in the batch, which could act as an implicit negative (contrastive) term. However, we experimentally show that replacing BN with a batch-independent normalization scheme (namely, a combination of group normalization and weight standardization) achieves performance comparable to vanilla BYOL ($73.9\%$ vs. $74.3\%$ top-1 accuracy under the linear evaluation protocol on ImageNet with ResNet-$50$). Our finding disproves the hypothesis that the use of batch statistics is a crucial ingredient for BYOL to learn useful representations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DINO is flexible and works on both convnets and ViTs without the need to modify the architecture, nor adapt internal normalizations.
“Of particular importance, our framework is flexible and works on both convnets and ViTs without the need to modify the architecture, nor adapt internal normalizations [58].”
From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
DINO's method can be interpreted as applying Polyak-Ruppert averaging during training to constantly build a model ensembling that has superior performances, and this model ensembling guides the training of the student network.
“Our method can be interpreted as applying Polyak-Ruppert averaging during the training to constantly build a model ensembling that has superior performances. This model ensembling then guides the training of the student network [65].”
From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [65]
The fact that the teacher continually outperforms the student further encourages the interpretation of DINO as a form of Mean Teacher self-distillation.
“The fact that the teacher continually outperforms the student further encourages the interpretation of DINO as a form of Mean Teacher [65] self-distillation.”
From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [65]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers
Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jegou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., & Joulin, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00951 · Cited by 5,638 · see citing works
“Of particular importance, our framework is flexible and works on both convnets and ViTs without the need to modify the architecture, nor adapt internal normalizations [47].”
A large-scale study on unsupervised spatiotemporal representation learning
Feichtenhofer, C., Fan, H., Xiong, B., Girshick, R., & He, K. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00331 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
- Authors
- Richemond, P. H., Grill, J.-B., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Strub, F., Brock, A., Smith, S., De, S., Pascanu, R., Piot, B., & Valko, M.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.10241
- OpenAlex
- W3093929102
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- DeepMind
- LOEWE Zentrum AdRIA
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- BYOL, self-supervised learning, batch normalization, group normalization, weight standardization, representation collapse, image representation learning, contrastive learning, ImageNet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review