The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incels
Open accessAbstract
When toxic online communities on mainstream platforms face moderation measures, such as bans, they may migrate to other platforms with laxer policies or set up their own dedicated websites. Previous work suggests that within mainstream platforms, community-level moderation is effective in mitigating the harm caused by the moderated communities. It is, however, unclear whether these results also hold when considering the broader Web ecosystem. Do toxic communities continue to grow in terms of their user base and activity on the new platforms? Do their members become more toxic and ideologically radicalized? In this paper, we report the results of a large-scale observational study of how problematic online communities progress following community-level moderation measures. We analyze data from r/The_Donald and r/Incels, two communities that were banned from Reddit and subsequently migrated to their own standalone websites. Our results suggest that, in both cases, moderation measures significantly decreased posting activity on the new platform, reducing the number of posts, active users, and newcomers. In spite of that, users in one of the studied communities (r/The_Donald) showed increases in signals associated with toxicity and radicalization, which justifies concerns that the reduction in activity may come at the expense of a more toxic and radical community. Overall, our results paint a nuanced portrait of the consequences of community-level moderation and can inform their design and deployment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mainstream platforms have stricter policies and are subject to some platform-level moderation but benefit from heightened visibility, whilst fringe platforms/forums, particularly those dedicated to incels and misogynistic communities, are more secluded and often lack moderation, resulting in more toxic and misogynistic speech and content (Mamié et al., 2021; Ribeiro et al., 2020; Wright et al., 2”
From Mainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok (2023) · cites this paper as Ribeiro et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Research examining the language employed on dedicated manosphere and incel forums and subreddits established an increase in violent extremist expressions, including dehumanisation and words depicting violence towards women (Baele et al., 2023; Ribeiro et al., 2020).”
From Mainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok (2023) · cites this paper as Ribeiro et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774
Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language
Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M., & Weber, I. (2017) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14955 · Cited by 2,610
Massanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264
Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere
Ging, D. (2019) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x17706401 · Cited by 1,245
Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., & Blackburn, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7347 · Cited by 881
Self-citationThe Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection
Sap, M., Card, D., Gabriel, S., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1163 · Cited by 817
Gillespie, T. (2019) · doi:10.12987/9780300235029 · Cited by 806
Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube
Ribeiro, M. H., Ottoni, R., West, R., Almeida, V. A. F., & Meira, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372879 · Cited by 580
Self-citationRoberts, S. T. (2019) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300245318 · Cited by 559
Cheng, J., Bernstein, M. S., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Leskovec, J. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998213 · Cited by 499
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [9][9] Cheng, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., and Leskovec, J. Antisocial behavior in online discussion communities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) (2015). -
- [28][28] Lilly, M. 'The World is Not a Safe Place for Men': The Representational Politics Of The Manosphere . PhD thesis, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa, 2016. -
- [33][33] Newell, E., Jurgens, D., Saleem, H. M., Vala, H., Sassine, J., Armstrong, C., and Ruths, D. User migration in online social networks: a case study on Reddit during a period of community unrest. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) (2016). -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quarantined! Examining the Effects of a Community-Wide Moderation Intervention on Reddit
Chandrasekharan, E., Jhaver, S., Bruckman, A., & Gilbert, E. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3490499 · Cited by 129
Self-citationMainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok
Solea, A. I., & Sugiura, L. (2023) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-023-09559-5 · Cited by 105
Unsafe Diffusion: On the Generation of Unsafe Images and Hateful Memes From Text-To-Image Models
Qu, Y., Shen, X., He, X., Michael Backes, A., Zannettou, S., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3576915.3616679 · Cited by 120
Self-citationDesigning Word Filter Tools for Creator-led Comment Moderation
Jhaver, S., Chen, Q. Z., Knauss, D., & Zhang, A. X. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517505 · Cited by 82
Self-citationBroniatowski, D. A., Simons, J. R., Gu, J., Jamison, A. M., & Abroms, L. C. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh2132 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Ribeiro, M. H., Jhaver, S., Zannettou, S., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., & West, R.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Binghamton University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- CSCW2
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.10397
- OpenAlex
- W3094590334
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- OpenBU (Boston University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2114411)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- platform migration, content moderation, ideological radicalization, online toxicity, user activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
