PreprintCited by 54Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsNeural Networks and Applications

Continual Learning in Low-rank Orthogonal Subspaces

Open access
Chaudhry, Arslan, Khan, Naeemullah, Dokania, Puneet K., Torr, Philip H. S.·2020·arXiv

Abstract

In continual learning (CL), a learner is faced with a sequence of tasks, arriving one after the other, and the goal is to remember all the tasks once the continual learning experience is finished. The prior art in CL uses episodic memory, parameter regularization or extensible network structures to reduce interference among tasks, but in the end, all the approaches learn different tasks in a joint vector space. We believe this invariably leads to interference among different tasks. We propose to learn tasks in different (low-rank) vector subspaces that are kept orthogonal to each other in order to minimize interference. Further, to keep the gradients of different tasks coming from these subspaces orthogonal to each other, we learn isometric mappings by posing network training as an optimization problem over the Stiefel manifold. To the best of our understanding, we report, for the first time, strong results over experience-replay baseline with and without memory on standard classification benchmarks in continual learning. The code is made publicly available.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2010.11635

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Orthog-Subspace maps different pieces of knowledge into distinct subspaces, minimizing mutual interference between them.

    “Orthog-Subspace (Chaudhry et al., 2020) maps different pieces of knowledge into distinct subspaces, minimizing mutual interference between them.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 54

Authors
Chaudhry, A., Khan, N., Dokania, P. K., & Torr, P. H. S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
33
Pages
9900-9911
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3098195673
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • neural information processing systems
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N019474/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
continual learning, task interference, Stiefel manifold, isometric mapping, experience replay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review