Continual Learning in Low-rank Orthogonal Subspaces
Open accessAbstract
In continual learning (CL), a learner is faced with a sequence of tasks, arriving one after the other, and the goal is to remember all the tasks once the continual learning experience is finished. The prior art in CL uses episodic memory, parameter regularization or extensible network structures to reduce interference among tasks, but in the end, all the approaches learn different tasks in a joint vector space. We believe this invariably leads to interference among different tasks. We propose to learn tasks in different (low-rank) vector subspaces that are kept orthogonal to each other in order to minimize interference. Further, to keep the gradients of different tasks coming from these subspaces orthogonal to each other, we learn isometric mappings by posing network training as an optimization problem over the Stiefel manifold. To the best of our understanding, we report, for the first time, strong results over experience-replay baseline with and without memory on standard classification benchmarks in continual learning. The code is made publicly available.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Orthog-Subspace maps different pieces of knowledge into distinct subspaces, minimizing mutual interference between them.
“Orthog-Subspace (Chaudhry et al., 2020) maps different pieces of knowledge into distinct subspaces, minimizing mutual interference between them.”
From Knowledge Decoupling via Orthogonal Projection for Lifelong Editing of Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Chaudhry et al., 2020
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 54
- Authors
- Chaudhry, A., Khan, N., Dokania, P. K., & Torr, P. H. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 33
- Pages
- 9900-9911
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.11635
- OpenAlex
- W3098195673
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- neural information processing systems
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N019474/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- continual learning, task interference, Stiefel manifold, isometric mapping, experience replay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review