The phase transition for planar Gaussian percolation models without FKG
Open accessAbstract
We develop techniques to study the phase transition for planar Gaussian percolation models that are not (necessarily) positively correlated. These models lack the property of positive associations (also known as the `FKG inequality'), and hence many classical arguments in percolation theory do not apply. More precisely, we consider a smooth stationary centred planar Gaussian field $f$ and, given a level $\ell \in \mathbb{R}$, we study the connectivity properties of the excursion set $\{f \geq -\ell\}$. We prove the existence of a phase transition at the critical level $\ell_{crit}=0$ under only symmetry and (very mild) correlation decay assumptions, which are satisfied by the random plane wave for instance. As a consequence, all non-zero level lines are bounded almost surely, although our result does not settle the boundedness of zero level lines (`no percolation at criticality'). To show our main result: (i) we prove a general sharp threshold criterion, inspired by works of Chatterjee, that states that `sharp thresholds are equivalent to the delocalisation of the threshold location'; (ii) we prove threshold delocalisation for crossing events at large scales -- at this step we obtain a sharp threshold result but without being able to locate the threshold -- and (iii) to identify the threshold, we adapt Tassion's RSW theory replacing the FKG inequality by a sprinkling procedure. Although some arguments are specific to the Gaussian setting, many steps are very general and we hope that our techniques may be adapted to analyse other models without FKG.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- K.S. Alexander. Boundedness of level lines for two-dimensional random fields. Ann. Probab., 24(4):1653-1674, 1996.
- D. Ahlberg and J.E. Steif. Scaling limits for the threshold window: When does a monotone Boolean function flip its outcome? With an appendix by G. Pete. Ann. I. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat., 53(4):2135-2161, 2017.
- R.J. Adler and J.E. Taylor. Random Fields and Geometry. Springer, 2007.
- J.M. Azaïs and M. Wschebor. Level Sets and Extrema of Random Processes and Fields. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2009.
- E. Bogomolny, R. Dubertrand, and C. Schmit. SLE description of the nodal lines of random wave- functions. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 40(3):381, 2006.
- V. Beffara and D. Gayet. Percolation of random nodal lines. Publ. Math. IHES, 126(1):131-176, 2017.
- D. Beliaev and S. Muirhead. Discretisation schemes for level sets of planar Gaussian fields. Commun. Math. Phys., 359(3):869-913, 2018.
- D. Beliaev, M. McAuley, and S. Muirhead. On the number of excursion sets of planar Gaussian fields. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 178(3):655-698, 2020.
- D. Beliaev, M. McAuley, and S. Muirhead. Smoothness and monotonicity of the excursion set density of planar Gaussian fields. Electron. J. Probab., 25(93):1-37, 2020.
- D. Beliaev, S. Muirhead, and A. Rivera. A covariance formula for topological events of smooth Gaussian fields. Ann. Probab., 48(6):2845-2893, 2020.
- E. Bogomolny and S. Schmit. Percolation model for nodal domains of chaotic wave functions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88(11):114102, 2002.
- D. Cordero-Erausquin and M. Ledoux. Hypercontractive measures, Talagrand's inequality, and influences. In Geometric aspects of functional analysis, pages 169-189. Springer, 2012.
- S. Chatterjee. Chaos, concentration, and multiple valleys. arXiv preprint arXiv:0810.4221, 2008. · arXiv
- S. Chatterjee. Superconcentration and related topics. Springer, 2014.
- H. Duminil-Copin, A. Raoufi, and V. Tassion. Sharp phase transition for the random-cluster and Potts models via decision trees. Ann. Math., 189(1):75-99, 2019.
- H. Duminil-Copin, A. Rivera, Pierre-F. Rodriguez, and H. Vanneuville. Existence of an unbounded nodal hypersurface for smooth Gaussian fields in dimension d ≥ 3. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.08008, 2021. · arXiv
- B.T. Graham and G.R Grimmett. Influence and sharp-threshold theorems for monotonic measures. Ann. Probab., 34(5):1726-1745, 2006.
- A. Gandolfi, M. Keane, and L. Russo. On the uniqueness of the infinite occupied cluster in depen- dent two-dimensional site percolation. Ann. Probab., 16(3):1147-1157, 1988.
- Mark Goresky and Robert MacPherson. Stratified morse theory. Springer, 1988.
- G.R. Grimmett and J.M. Marstrand. The supercritical phase of percolation is well behaved. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A430:439-457, 1990.
- G.R. Grimmett. Percolation (Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften). Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1999.
- T.E. Harris. A lower bound for the critical probability in a certain percolation process. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 56:13-20, 1960.
- M.B. Isichenko. Percolation, statistical topography, and transport in random media. Rev. Mod. Pys., 64(4):961-1043, 1992.
- S. Janson. Gaussian Hilbert spaces, volume 129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
- M. Kratz and J. León. Central limit theorems for level functionals of stationary Gaussian processes and fields. J. Theor. Probab, 14(3):639-672, 2001.
- Laurin Köhler-Schindler and Vincent Tassion. Crossing probabilities for planar percolation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.04618, 2020. · arXiv
- S.A. Molchanov and A.K. Stepanov. Percolation in random fields. I. Theor. Math. Phys., 55(2):478- 484, 1983.
- S.A. Molchanov and A.K. Stepanov. Percolation in random fields. II. Theor. Math. Phys., 55(3):592- 599, 1983.
- S. Muirhead and F. Severo. Percolation of strongly correlated Gaussian fields I. decay of subcritical connection probabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10723, 2022. · arXiv
- S. Muirhead and H. Vanneuville. The sharp phase transition for level set percolation of smooth planar Gaussian fields. Ann. I. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat., 56(2):1358-1390, 2020.
- I. Nourdin, G. Peccati, and M. Rossi. Nodal statistics of planar random waves. Commun. Math. Phys., 369(1):99-151, 2019.
- F. Nazarov and M. Sodin. On the number of nodal domains of random spherical harmonics. Amer. J. Math., 131(5):1337-1357, 2009.
- F. Nazarov and M. Sodin. Asymptotic laws for the spatial distribution and the number of connected components of zero sets of Gaussian random functions. J. Math. Phys. Anal. Geo., 12(3):205-278, 2016.
- L.D. Pitt. Positively correlated normal variables are associated. Ann. Probab., 10(2):496-499, 1982.
- A. Rivera and H. Vanneuville. Quasi-independence for nodal lines. Ann. I. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat., 55(3):1679-1711, 2019.
- M. Sodin. Lectures on random nodal portraits. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics: Probability and Statistical Physics in St. Petersburg, 91:395-422, 2016.
- M. Talagrand. On Russo's approximate zero-one law. Ann. Probab., 22(3):1576-1587, 1994.
- V. Tassion. Crossing probabilities for Voronoi percolation. Ann. Probab., 44(5):3385-3398, 2016.
- A. Weinrib. Long-range correlated percolation. Phys. Rev. B, 29(1):387, 1984.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diophantine Gaussian excursions and random walks
Lachièze-Rey, R. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.07290 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Muirhead, S., Rivera, A., Vanneuville, H., & Köhler-Schindler, L.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1785-1829
- ISSN
- 0091-1798 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.11770
- OpenAlex
- W3094038065
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Locations
- The Annals of Probability (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (175505)
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
- Keywords
- phase transitions, FKG inequality, sharp threshold, excursion sets, random plane waves, level lines, sprinkling, positive association
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review