PreprintCited by 6Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Algorithmic Primitives for Quantum-Assisted Quantum Control

Open access

Abstract

We discuss two primitive algorithms to evaluate overlaps and transition matrix time series, which are used to construct a variety of quantum-assisted quantum control algorithms implementable on NISQ devices. Unlike previous approaches, our method bypasses tomographically complete measurements and instead relies solely on single qubit measurements. We analyse circuit complexity of composed algorithms and sources of noise arising from Trotterization and measurement errors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2011.13777

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. [1]S. J. Glaser, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, C. P. Koch, W. Köckenberger, R. Kosloff, I. Kuprov, B. Luy, S. Schirmer, T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, et al. , The European Physical Journal D 69 , 1 (2015).
  2. [2]D. J. Tannor, V. Kazakov, and V. Orlov, in Timedependent quantum molecular dynamics (Springer, 1992) pp. 347-360.
  3. [3]N. Khaneja, T. Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, and S. J. Glaser, Journal of magnetic resonance 172 , 296 (2005).
  4. [4]P. Gross, D. Neuhauser, and H. Rabitz, The Journal of chemical physics 96 , 2834 (1992).
  5. [5]T. Szakács, B. Amstrup, P. Gross, R. Kosloff, H. Rabitz, and A. Lörincz, Physical Review A 50 , 2540 (1994).
  6. [6]W. Zhu and H. Rabitz, The Journal of Chemical Physics 109 , 385 (1998).
  7. [7]E. Zahedinejad, J. Ghosh, and B. C. Sanders, Physical Review Applied 6 , 054005 (2016).
  8. [8]R. J. Spiteri, M. Schmidt, J. Ghosh, E. Zahedinejad, and B. C. Sanders, New Journal of Physics 20 , 113009 (2018).
  9. [11]M. Bukov, A. G. Day, D. Sels, P. Weinberg, A. Polkovnikov, and P. Mehta, Physical Review X 8 , 031086 (2018).
  10. [12]T. Caneva, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Physical Review A 84 , 022326 (2011).
  11. [13]N. Rach, M. M. Müller, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Physical Review A 92 , 062343 (2015).
  12. [15]A. Pechen and H. Rabitz, Physical Review A 73 , 062102 (2006).
  13. [16]S. Grivopoulos and B. Bamieh, in 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37475) , Vol. 1 (IEEE, 2003) pp. 434-438.
  14. [19]G. Jäger, D. M. Reich, M. H. Goerz, C. P. Koch, and U. Hohenester, Physical Review A 90 , 033628 (2014).
  15. [20]P. Doria, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Physical review letters 106 , 190501 (2011).
  16. [22]E. Pednault, J. A. Gunnels, G. Nannicini, L. Horesh, T. Magerlein, E. Solomonik, and R. Wisnieff, arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.05867 15 (2017). · arXiv
  17. [23]J. Li, X. Yang, X. Peng, and C.-P. Sun, Physical review letters 118 , 150503 (2017).
  18. [26]N. Yu, R. Duan, and M. Ying, Physical Review A 88 , 010304 (2013).
  19. [27]J. J. Vartiainen, M. Möttönen, and M. M. Salomaa, Physical review letters 92 , 177902 (2004).
  20. [28]V. V. Shende, S. S. Bullock, and I. L. Markov, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 25 , 1000 (2006).
  21. [29]M. Oszmaniec, A. Grudka, M. Horodecki, and A. Wójcik, Physical review letters 116 , 110403 (2016).
  22. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Physical Review A 76 , 042319 (2007).
  23. [35]T. Roy, S. Kundu, M. Chand, S. Hazra, N. Nehra, R. Cosmic, A. Ranadive, M. P. Patankar, K. Damle, and R. Vijay, Physical Review Applied 7 , 054025 (2017).
  24. [36]A. M. Childs and N. Wiebe, arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.5822 (2012). · arXiv
  25. [38]A. Gilyén, Y. Su, G. H. Low, and N. Wiebe, in Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (2019) pp. 193-204.
  26. [39]J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, The computer journal 7 , 308 (1965).
  27. [40]H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, J. Watrous, and R. De Wolf, Physical Review Letters 87 , 167902 (2001).
  28. [41]D. Poulin, A. Qarry, R. Somma, and F. Verstraete, Physical review letters 106 , 170501 (2011).
  29. [49]A. B. Magann, C. Arenz, M. D. Grace, T.-S. Ho, R. L. Kosut, J. R. McClean, H. A. Rabitz, and M. Sarovar, arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.06702 (2020). · arXiv
  30. [50]S. J. Devitt, A. G. Fowler, A. M. Stephens, A. D. Greentree, L. C. Hollenberg, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto, New Journal of Physics 11 , 083032 (2009).
  31. [51]C. Arenz and H. Rabitz, Physical review letters 120 , 220503 (2018).
  32. [52]J. Lee, C. Arenz, D. Burgarth, and H. Rabitz, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53 , 125304 (2020).
  33. [54]N. Suri, F. C. Binder, B. Muralidharan, and S. Vinjanampathy, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 227 , 203 (2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Policharla, G.-V., & Vinjanampathy, S.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
  • Centre for Quantum Technologies (SG)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
127
Issue
22
Pages
220504-220504
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108766783
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (public-domain)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (DST/ICPS/QuST/Theme-4/2019, ECR/2018/000957)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
single-qubit measurement, circuit complexity, measurement error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review