PreprintCited by 34Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Visualization of Supervised and Self-Supervised Neural Networks via Attribution Guided Factorization

Open access
Gur, Shir, Ali, Ameen, Wolf, Lior·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Neural network visualization techniques mark image locations by their relevancy to the network's classification. Existing methods are effective in highlighting the regions that affect the resulting classification the most. However, as we show, these methods are limited in their ability to identify the support for alternative classifications, an effect we name {\em the saliency bias} hypothesis. In this work, we integrate two lines of research: gradient-based methods and attribution-based methods, and develop an algorithm that provides per-class explainability. The algorithm back-projects the per pixel local influence, in a manner that is guided by the local attributions, while correcting for salient features that would otherwise bias the explanation. In an extensive battery of experiments, we demonstrate the ability of our methods to class-specific visualization, and not just the predicted label. Remarkably, the method obtains state of the art results in benchmarks that are commonly applied to gradient-based methods as well as in those that are employed mostly for evaluating attribution methods. Using a new unsupervised procedure, our method is also successful in demonstrating that self-supervised methods learn semantic information.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2012.02166

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-supervised convnets also contain information about segmentations, but dedicated methods are required to extract it from their weights.

    “Note that self-supervised convnets also contain information about segmentations but it requires dedicated methods to extract it from their weights [31].”

    From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gur, S., Ali, A., & Wolf, L.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
35
Issue
13
Pages
11545-11554
ISSN
2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109440167
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7
FWCI
3.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Tel Aviv University
  • H2020 European Research Council (725974)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
neural network visualization, saliency maps, gradient-based optimization, attribution methods, back-projection, self-supervised learning, semantic information, explainable AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review