Visualization of Supervised and Self-Supervised Neural Networks via Attribution Guided Factorization
Open accessAbstract
Neural network visualization techniques mark image locations by their relevancy to the network's classification. Existing methods are effective in highlighting the regions that affect the resulting classification the most. However, as we show, these methods are limited in their ability to identify the support for alternative classifications, an effect we name {\em the saliency bias} hypothesis. In this work, we integrate two lines of research: gradient-based methods and attribution-based methods, and develop an algorithm that provides per-class explainability. The algorithm back-projects the per pixel local influence, in a manner that is guided by the local attributions, while correcting for salient features that would otherwise bias the explanation. In an extensive battery of experiments, we demonstrate the ability of our methods to class-specific visualization, and not just the predicted label. Remarkably, the method obtains state of the art results in benchmarks that are commonly applied to gradient-based methods as well as in those that are employed mostly for evaluating attribution methods. Using a new unsupervised procedure, our method is also successful in demonstrating that self-supervised methods learn semantic information.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-supervised convnets also contain information about segmentations, but dedicated methods are required to extract it from their weights.
“Note that self-supervised convnets also contain information about segmentations but it requires dedicated methods to extract it from their weights [31].”
From Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers
Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jegou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., & Joulin, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00951 · Cited by 5,638 · see citing works
Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualization
Chefer, H., Gur, S., & Wolf, L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00084 · Cited by 903 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gur, S., Ali, A., & Wolf, L.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- ORCID
- Wolf, Lior
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 11545-11554
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2012.02166
- OpenAlex
- W3109440167
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Tel Aviv University
- H2020 European Research Council (725974)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- neural network visualization, saliency maps, gradient-based optimization, attribution methods, back-projection, self-supervised learning, semantic information, explainable AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review