Selective Inference for Hierarchical Clustering
Open accessAbstract
Classical tests for a difference in means control the type I error rate when the groups are defined a priori. However, when the groups are instead defined via clustering, then applying a classical test yields an extremely inflated type I error rate. Notably, this problem persists even if two separate and independent data sets are used to define the groups and to test for a difference in their means. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose a selective inference approach to test for a difference in means between two clusters. Our procedure controls the selective type I error rate by accounting for the fact that the choice of null hypothesis was made based on the data. We describe how to efficiently compute exact p-values for clusters obtained using agglomerative hierarchical clustering with many commonly-used linkages. We apply our method to simulated data and to single-cell RNA-sequencing data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pseudobulk approach overcomes the inherent limitations of DE analysis comparisons between clusters, which suffer from using the same data to both select and test the null hypothesis.
“This pseudobulk approach also overcomes the inherent limitations of DE analysis comparisons between clusters, which suffer from using the same data to both select and test the null hypothesis24,25.”
From Dissection of artifactual and confounding glial signatures by single-cell sequencing of mouse and human brain (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Due to issues with statistical analysis between clusters using the same data used to generate clustering, no statistical cutoff was employed and these lists were not used in downstream module scoring or analysis.
“Due to the issues mentioned above with statistical analysis performed between clusters using the same data used to generate clustering24,25, we did not employ any statistical cutoff or use these lists in any downstream module scoring or analysis.”
From Dissection of artifactual and confounding glial signatures by single-cell sequencing of mouse and human brain (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marsh, S. E., Walker, A. J., Kamath, T., Dissing-Olesen, L., Hammond, T. R., de Soysa, T. Y., Young, A. M. H., Murphy, S., Abdulraouf, A., Nadaf, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01022-8 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gao, L. L., Bien, J., & Witten, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2012.02936
- OpenAlex
- W4287557338
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1653017, CAREER, 1252624)
- National Institutes of Health
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA047869)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM123993)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB026908)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- selective inference, hierarchical clustering, type I error control, agglomerative clustering, cluster comparison, exact p-values, linkage, single-cell RNA sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review