Parameter Efficient Multimodal Transformers for Video Representation Learning
Open accessAbstract
The recent success of Transformers in the language domain has motivated adapting it to a multimodal setting, where a new visual model is trained in tandem with an already pretrained language model. However, due to the excessive memory requirements from Transformers, existing work typically fixes the language model and train only the vision module, which limits its ability to learn cross-modal information in an end-to-end manner. In this work, we focus on reducing the parameters of multimodal Transformers in the context of audio-visual video representation learning. We alleviate the high memory requirement by sharing the parameters of Transformers across layers and modalities; we decompose the Transformer into modality-specific and modality-shared parts so that the model learns the dynamics of each modality both individually and together, and propose a novel parameter sharing scheme based on low-rank approximation. We show that our approach reduces parameters of the Transformers up to 97$\%$, allowing us to train our model end-to-end from scratch. We also propose a negative sampling approach based on an instance similarity measured on the CNN embedding space that our model learns together with the Transformers. To demonstrate our approach, we pretrain our model on 30-second clips (480 frames) from Kinetics-700 and transfer it to audio-visual classification tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing solutions in multimodal Transformer adopt a fixed fusion strategy.
“Existing solutions in multimodal Transformer adopt a fixed fusion strategy [18,21,24,26,33].”
From Are Multimodal Transformers Robust to Missing Modality? (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Lee, S., Yu, Y., Kim, G., Breuel, T., Kautz, J., & Song, Y.
- Affiliations
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Nvidia (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2012.04124
- OpenAlex
- W3121735241
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- International Conference on Learning Representations
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- multimodal transformer, parameter efficiency, video representation learning, audiovisual representation, cross-modal learning, parameter sharing, low-rank approximation, negative sampling, instance similarity, memory reduction, end-to-end learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review