Distilling Knowledge from Reader to Retriever for Question Answering
Open accessAbstract
The task of information retrieval is an important component of many natural language processing systems, such as open domain question answering. While traditional methods were based on hand-crafted features, continuous representations based on neural networks recently obtained competitive results. A challenge of using such methods is to obtain supervised data to train the retriever model, corresponding to pairs of query and support documents. In this paper, we propose a technique to learn retriever models for downstream tasks, inspired by knowledge distillation, and which does not require annotated pairs of query and documents. Our approach leverages attention scores of a reader model, used to solve the task based on retrieved documents, to obtain synthetic labels for the retriever. We evaluate our method on question answering, obtaining state-of-the-art results.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On the filtered TriviaQA version, Chinchilla lags behind the open book SOTA (Izacard and Grave, 2020) by only 7.9%.
“On the filtered version, Chinchilla lags behind the open book SOTA (Izacard and Grave, 2020) by only 7.9%.”
From Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Izacard and Grave, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929 · see citing works
Lewis, M., Liu, Y., Goyal, N., Ghazvininejad, M., Mohamed, A., Levy, O., Stoyanov, V., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.703 · Cited by 8,821 · see citing works
Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs
Johnson, J., Douze, M., & Jegou, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2019.2921572 · Cited by 4,228 · see citing works
Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering
Karpukhin, V., Oguz, B., Min, S., Lewis, P., Wu, L., Edunov, S., Chen, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550 · Cited by 3,575 · see citing works
Natural Questions: A benchmark for question answering research
Kwiatkowski, T., Palomaki, J., Redfield, O., Collins, M., Parikh, A., Alberti, C., Epstein, D., Polosukhin, I., Devlin, J., Lee, K., et al. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00276 · Cited by 2,069 · see citing works
TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension
Joshi, M., Choi, E., Weld, D., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1147 · Cited by 1,690 · see citing works
Nogueira, R., & Cho, K. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.04085 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challenge
Kočiský, T., Schwarz, J., Blunsom, P., Dyer, C., Hermann, K. M., Melis, G., & Grefenstette, E. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00023 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrieval
Luan, Y., Eisenstein, J., Toutanova, K., & Collins, M. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00369 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Wei-Cheng Chang, Felix X Yu, Yin-Wen Chang, Yiming Yang, and Sanjiv Kumar. Pre-training tasks for embedding-based large-scale retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.03932 , 2020. 3 · arXiv
- Danqi Chen, Adam Fisch, Jason Weston, and Antoine Bordes. Reading Wikipedia to answer opendomain questions. In Proc. ACL , 2017. 1, 6
- Scott Deerwester, Susan T Dumais, George W Furnas, Thomas K Landauer, and Richard Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American society for information science , 41 (6):391-407, 1990. 2
- Mostafa Dehghani, Hamed Zamani, Aliaksei Severyn, Jaap Kamps, and W. Bruce Croft. Neural ranking models with weak supervision. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , SIGIR '17, pp. 65-74, New York, NY, USA, 2017. Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/3077136.3080832. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3077136.3080832 . 5 · DOI
- Daniel Gillick, Alessandro Presta, and Gaurav Singh Tomar. End-to-end retrieval in continuous space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.08008 , 2018. 2 · arXiv
- Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat, and Ming-Wei Chang. Realm: Retrievalaugmented language model pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.08909 , 2020. 3 · arXiv
- Po-Sen Huang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, Alex Acero, and Larry Heck. Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACMinternational conference on Information & Knowledge Management , pp. 2333-2338, 2013. 2
- Samuel Humeau, Kurt Shuster, Marie-Anne Lachaux, and Jason Weston. Poly-encoders: Transformer architectures and pre-training strategies for fast and accurate multi-sentence scoring. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.01969 , 2019. 2 · arXiv
- Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open domain question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.01282 , 2020. 3, 7 · arXiv
- Karen Sparck Jones. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of documentation , 1972. 1, 2
- Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, and Kristina Toutanova. Latent retrieval for weakly supervised open domain question answering. In Proc. ACL , 2019. 2, 5, 12
- Mike Lewis, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Gargi Ghosh, Armen Aghajanyan, Sida Wang, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Pre-training via paraphrasing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.15020 , 2020a. 3 · arXiv
- Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandara Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich K¨ uttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rockt¨ aschel, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11401 , 2020b. 3, 7 · arXiv
- Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019. 12
- Christopher D Manning, Hinrich Sch¨ utze, and Prabhakar Raghavan. Introduction to information retrieval . Cambridge university press, 2008. 2
- Bhaskar Mitra, Nick Craswell, et al. An introduction to neural information retrieval. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval , 13(1):1-126, 2018. 2
- Hamid Palangi, Li Deng, Yelong Shen, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong He, Jianshu Chen, Xinying Song, and Rabab Ward. Deep sentence embedding using long short-term memory networks: Analysis and application to information retrieval. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , 24(4):694-707, 2016. 2
- Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. SQuAD: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In Proc. EMNLP , 2016. 6
- Yelong Shen, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, and Gr´ egoire Mesnil. Learning semantic representations using convolutional neural networks for web search. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web , pp. 373-374, 2014. 2
- James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. Fever: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and verification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05355 , 2018. 1 · arXiv
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Ł ukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , pp. 5998-6008. 2017. 4
- Sohee Yang and Minjoon Seo. Is retriever merely an approximator of reader? arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10999 , 2020. 3 · arXiv
- Wei Yang, Yuqing Xie, Aileen Lin, Xingyu Li, Luchen Tan, Kun Xiong, Ming Li, and Jimmy Lin. End-to-end open-domain question answering with BERTserini. In Proc. NAACL (Demonstrations) , 2019. 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Casas, D. D. L., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2176 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
“On the filtered version, Chinchilla lags behind the open book SOTA (Izacard and Grave, 2020) by only 7.9%.”
InfluentialHan, B., Susnjak, T., & Mathrani, A. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14199103 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
R2-D2: A Modular Baseline for Open-Domain Question Answering
Fajcik, M., Docekal, M., Ondrej, K., & Smrz, P. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.73 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Chen, H.-T., Zhang, M. J. Q., & Choi, E. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13701 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Augmentation-Adapted Retriever Improves Generalization of Language Models as Generic Plug-In
Yu, Z., Xiong, C., Yu, S., & Liu, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17331 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Peerify: Benchmarking Peer-Review Claim Verification
Daghighfarsoodeh, A., Ebrahimi, S., Ghorbanpour, A., Sadeghian, S., Cheraghi, R., Arabzadeh, N., & Bagheri, E. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.25046
“These datasets have enabled systems that retrieve evidence and determine whether a claim is supported, contradicted, or unsupported, and retrieval-augmented approaches (Lewis et al., 2020b; Izacard and Grave, 2021) have further improved evidence-grounded and multi-hop reasoning.”
Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedback
Wu, J., Ouyang, L., Ziegler, D. M., Stiennon, N., Lowe, R., Leike, J., & Christiano, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.10862 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Izacard, G., & Grave, E.
- Affiliations
- Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2012.04584
- OpenAlex
- W3111425437
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- knowledge distillation, open-domain question answering, information retrieval, reader model, attention scores
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
