The DOI matches its DataCite record; 48 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EQG-RACE: Examination-Type Question Generation
Open accessAbstract
Question Generation (QG) is an essential component of the automatic intelligent tutoring systems, which aims to generate high-quality questions for facilitating the reading practice and assessments. However, existing QG technologies encounter several key issues concerning the biased and unnatural language sources of datasets which are mainly obtained from the Web (e.g. SQuAD). In this paper, we propose an innovative Examination-type Question Generation approach (EQG-RACE) to generate exam-like questions based on a dataset extracted from RACE. Two main strategies are employed in EQG-RACE for dealing with discrete answer information and reasoning among long contexts. A Rough Answer and Key Sentence Tagging scheme is utilized to enhance the representations of input. An Answer-guided Graph Convolutional Network (AG-GCN) is designed to capture structure information in revealing the inter-sentences and intra-sentence relations. Experimental results show a state-of-the-art performance of EQG-RACE, which is apparently superior to the baselines. In addition, our work has established a new QG prototype with a reshaped dataset and QG method, which provides an important benchmark for related research in future work. We will make our data and code publicly available for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks
See, A., Liu, P. J., & Manning, C. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1099 · Cited by 3,775
MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset
Bajaj, P., Campos, D., Craswell, N., Deng, L., Gao, J., Liu, X., Majumder, R., McNamara, A., Mitra, B., Nguyen, T., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.09268 · Cited by 2,473
Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classification
Yao, L., Mao, C., & Luo, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017370 · Cited by 2,226
Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generation
Dong, L., Yang, N., Wang, W., Wei, F., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Gao, J., Zhou, M., & Hon, H.-W. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.03197 · Cited by 1,225
RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinations
Lai, G., Xie, Q., Liu, H., Yang, Y., & Hovy, E. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1082 · Cited by 1,044
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mitkov, R. 2003. Computer-aided generation of multiplechoice tests. International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 15-.
Cited by
Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075 · Cited by 409
A Review on the Use of Large Language Models as Virtual Tutors
García-Méndez, S., de Arriba-Pérez, F., & Somoza-López, M. D. C. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00530-2 · Cited by 95
Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trends
Lan, Y., Li, X., Du, H., Lu, X., Gao, M. Z., Qian, W., & Zhou, A. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3621181 · Cited by 52
Review on Neural Question Generation for Education Purposes
Faraby, S. A., Adiwijaya, A., & Romadhony, A. (2023) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-023-00374-x · Cited by 44
AI in medical education: uses of AI in construction type A MCQs
Rezigalla, A. A. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05250-3 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Jia, X., Zhou, W., Sun, X., & Wu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 13143-13151
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2012.06106
- OpenAlex
- W3174122384
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61936012)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- question generation, long-context reasoning, intelligent tutoring systems, reading comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
