CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 995Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum many-body systemsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Quantum Phases of Matter on a 256-Atom Programmable Quantum Simulator

Open access
Ebadi, Sepehr, Wang, Tout T., Levine, Harry, Keesling, Alexander, Semeghini, Giulia, Omran, Ahmed, Bluvstein, Dolev, Samajdar, Rhine +7 more·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2012.12281arXiv 2012.12281
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Motivated by far-reaching applications ranging from quantum simulations of complex processes in physics and chemistry to quantum information processing, a broad effort is currently underway to build large-scale programmable quantum systems. Such systems provide unique insights into strongly correlated quantum matter, while at the same time enabling new methods for computation and metrology. Here, we demonstrate a programmable quantum simulator based on deterministically prepared two-dimensional arrays of neutral atoms, featuring strong interactions controlled via coherent atomic excitation into Rydberg states. Using this approach, we realize a quantum spin model with tunable interactions for system sizes ranging from 64 to 256 qubits. We benchmark the system by creating and characterizing high-fidelity antiferromagnetically ordered states, and demonstrate the universal properties of an Ising quantum phase transition in (2+1) dimensions. We then create and study several new quantum phases that arise from the interplay between interactions and coherent laser excitation, experimentally map the phase diagram, and investigate the role of quantum fluctuations. Offering a new lens into the study of complex quantum matter, these observations pave the way for investigations of exotic quantum phases, non-equilibrium entanglement dynamics, and hardware-efficient realization of quantum algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2012.12281

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optical fields can be used to modify the potential and interaction parameters to simulate large-scale chemistry problems, as well as a quantum spin model with tunable interactions for system sizes ranging from 64 to 256 qubits.

    “Optical fields can be used to modify the potential and interaction parameters to simulate large-scale chemistry problems (Argüello-Luengo et al. , 2019), as well as a quantum spin model with tunable interactions for system sizes ranging from 64 to 256 qubits (Ebadi et al. , 2020).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Ebadi et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1]J. Preskill, Quantum 2 , 79 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [7]I. Aleiner et al. , arXiv:2012.00921 (2020). · arXiv
  3. [9]F. Arute et al. , Nature 574 , 505 (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [13]S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011).
  5. [15]G. Pagano, A. Bapat, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, A. De, P. W. Hess, H. B. Kaplan, A. Kyprianidis, W. L. Tan, C. Baldwin, L. T. Brady, A. Deshpande, F. Liu, S. Jordan, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 , 25396 (2020).
  6. [19]M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, arXiv:2011.03031 (2020). · arXiv
  7. [31]K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, D. Barredo, P. Scholl, H. Williams, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, arXiv:2011.06827 (2020). · arXiv
  8. [39]T. Felser, S. Notarnicola, and S. Montangero, arXiv:2011.08200 (2020). · arXiv
  9. [47]R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, arXiv:2011.12295 (2020). · arXiv
  10. [48]R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, arXiv:2011.12310 (2020). · arXiv
  11. [53]E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, arXiv:1411.4028 (2014). · arXiv
  12. [55]D. S. Wild, D. Sels, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, arXiv:2005.14059 (2020). · arXiv
  13. [59]C. Sheng, J. Hou, X. He, P. Xu, K. Wang, J. Zhuang, X. Li, M. Liu, J. Wang, and M. Zhan, arXiv:2011.10390 (2020). · arXiv
  14. [65]S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 , 2863 (1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [66]S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 48 , 10345 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [68]M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, arXiv:2007.14822 (2020). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebadi, S., Wang, T. T., Levine, H., Keesling, A., Semeghini, G., Omran, A., Bluvstein, D., Samajdar, R., Pichler, H., Ho, W. W., Choi, S., Sachdev, S., Greiner, M., Vuletic, V., & Lukin, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Lukin, Mikhail D.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
595
Issue
7866
Pages
227-232
ISSN
0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2012.12281
arXiv
2012.12281
OpenAlex
W3117469420
Cited by
995
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 126 · 2025: 232 · 2024: 215 · 2023: 192 · 2022: 191 · 2021: 39
FWCI
69.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0021013, DESC0019030)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
Rydberg atoms, optical tweezer arrays, neutral atom arrays, quantum spin systems, antiferromagnetic ordering, quantum critical dynamics, quantum phase diagram, quantum fluctuations, strongly correlated quantum matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review