Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Preprint

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A CNN Approach to Simultaneously Count Plants and Detect Plantation-Rows from UAV Imagery

Osco, Lucas Prado, de Arruda, Mauro dos Santos, Gonçalves, Diogo Nunes, Dias, Alexandre, Batistoti, Juliana, de Souza, Mauricio, Gomes, Felipe David Georges, Ramos, Ana Paula Marques, Jorge, Lúcio André de Castro, Liesenberg, Veraldo, Li, Jonathan, Ma, Lingfei, Junior, José Marcato, Gonçalves, Wesley Nunes·2020·arXiv

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning method based on a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that simultaneously detects and geolocates plantation-rows while counting its plants considering highly-dense plantation configurations. The experimental setup was evaluated in a cornfield with different growth stages and in a Citrus orchard. Both datasets characterize different plant density scenarios, locations, types of crops, sensors, and dates. A two-branch architecture was implemented in our CNN method, where the information obtained within the plantation-row is updated into the plant detection branch and retro-feed to the row branch; which are then refined by a Multi-Stage Refinement method. In the corn plantation datasets (with both growth phases, young and mature), our approach returned a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.224 plants per image patch, a mean relative error (MRE) of 0.1038, precision and recall values of 0.856, and 0.905, respectively, and an F-measure equal to 0.876. These results were superior to the results from other deep networks (HRNet, Faster R-CNN, and RetinaNet) evaluated with the same task and dataset. For the plantation-row detection, our approach returned precision, recall, and F-measure scores of 0.913, 0.941, and 0.925, respectively. To test the robustness of our model with a different type of agriculture, we performed the same task in the citrus orchard dataset. It returned an MAE equal to 1.409 citrus-trees per patch, MRE of 0.0615, precision of 0.922, recall of 0.911, and F-measure of 0.965. For citrus plantation-row detection, our approach resulted in precision, recall, and F-measure scores equal to 0.965, 0.970, and 0.964, respectively. The proposed method achieved state-of-the-art performance for counting and geolocating plants and plant-rows in UAV images from different types of crops.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2012.15827

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Osco, L. P., de Arruda, M. D. S., Gonçalves, D. N., Dias, A., Batistoti, J., de Souza, M., Gomes, F. D. G., Ramos, A. P. M., Jorge, L. A. D. C., Liesenberg, V., Li, J., Ma, L., Junior, J. M., & Gonçalves, W. N.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A CNN Approach to Simultaneously Count Plants and Detect Plantation-Rows from UAV Imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2012.15827
The paper
Osco, L. P., de Arruda, M. D. S., Gonçalves, D. N., Dias, A., Batistoti, J., de Souza, M., Gomes, F. D. G., Ramos, A. P. M., Jorge, L. A. D. C., Liesenberg, V., Li, J., Ma, L., Junior, J. M., & Gonçalves, W. N. (2020). A CNN Approach to Simultaneously Count Plants and Detect Plantation-Rows from UAV Imagery. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2012.15827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.