Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 96Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsQuantum Information and Cryptography

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Simple Mitigation of Global Depolarizing Errors in Quantum Simulations

Open access
Vovrosh, Joseph, Khosla, Kiran E., Greenaway, Sean, Self, Christopher, Kim, Myungshik, Knolle, Johannes·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2101.01690arXiv 2101.01690
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

To get the best possible results from current quantum devices error mitigation is essential. In this work we present a simple but effective error mitigation technique based on the assumption that noise in a deep quantum circuit is well described by global depolarizing error channels. By measuring the errors directly on the device, we use an error model ansatz to infer error-free results from noisy data. We highlight the effectiveness of our mitigation via two examples of recent interest in quantum many-body physics: entanglement measurements and real time dynamics of confinement in quantum spin chains. Our technique enables us to get quantitative results from the IBM quantum computers showing signatures of confinement, i.e. we are able to extract the meson masses of the confined excitations which were previously out of reach. Additionally, we show the applicability of this mitigation protocol in a wider setting with numerical simulations of more general tasks using a realistic error model. Our protocol is device-independent, simply implementable and leads to large improvements in results if the global errors are well described by depolarization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2101.01690

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. [4]A. M. Steane, Physical Review Letters 77 , 793 (1996).
  2. [5]P. W. Shor, Physical review A 52 , R2493 (1995).
  3. [10]S. Bravyi, S. Sheldon, A. Kandala, D. C. Mckay, and J. M. Gambetta, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.14044 (2020). · arXiv
  4. [11]Y. Chen, M. Farahzad, S. Yoo, and T.-C. Wei, Physical Review A 100 , 052315 (2019).
  5. [13]X. Bonet-Monroig, R. Sagastizabal, M. Singh, and T. O'Brien, Physical Review A 98 , 062339 (2018).
  6. [14]R. Sagastizabal, X. Bonet-Monroig, M. Singh, M. A. Rol, C. Bultink, X. Fu, C. Price, V. Ostroukh, N. Muthusubramanian, A. Bruno, et al. , Physical Review A 100 , 010302 (2019).
  7. [15]M. C. Tran, Y. Su, D. Carney, and J. M. Taylor, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.16248 (2020). · arXiv
  8. [16]W. J. Huggins, J. McClean, N. Rubin, Z. Jiang, N. Wiebe, K. B. Whaley, and R. Babbush, arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13117 · arXiv
  9. [17]S. McArdle, X. Yuan, and S. Benjamin, Physical review letters 122 , 180501 (2019).
  10. [18]E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, T. Papenbrock, R. C. Pooser, D. J. Dean, and P. Lougovski, Physical review letters 120 , 210501 (2018).
  11. [19]J. R. McClean, M. E. Kimchi-Schwartz, J. Carter, and W. A. De Jong, Physical Review A 95 , 042308 (2017).
  12. [20]J. I. Colless, V. V. Ramasesh, D. Dahlen, M. S. Blok, M. Kimchi-Schwartz, J. McClean, J. Carter, W. De Jong, and I. Siddiqi, Physical Review X 8 , 011021 (2018).
  13. [23]M. Otten and S. K. Gray, Physical Review A 99 , 012338 (2019).
  14. [25]A. Strikis, D. Qin, Y. Chen, S. C. Benjamin, and Y. Li, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07601 (2020). · arXiv
  15. [26]A. Zlokapa and A. Gheorghiu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10811 (2020). · arXiv
  16. [27]P. Czarnik, A. Arrasmith, P. J. Coles, and L. Cincio, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10189 (2020). · arXiv
  17. [28]Y. Li and S. C. Benjamin, Physical Review X 7 , 021050 (2017).
  18. [29]S. Endo, S. C. Benjamin, and Y. Li, Physical Review X 8 , 031027 (2018).
  19. [30]K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, Physical review letters 119 , 180509 (2017).
  20. [31]E. Gustafson, Y. Meurice, and J. Unmuth-Yockey, Physical Review D 99 , 094503 (2019).
  21. [32]T. Giurgica-Tiron, Y. Hindy, R. LaRose, A. Mari, and W. J. Zeng, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10921 (2020). · arXiv
  22. [33]Z. Cai, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.01265 (2020). · arXiv
  23. [34]A. He, B. Nachman, W. A. de Jong, and C. W. Bauer, arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04941 (2020). · arXiv
  24. [35]J. Vovrosh and J. Knolle, arXiv:2001.03044 (2020). · arXiv
  25. [37]B. Vermersch, A. Elben, M. Dalmonte, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Physical Review A 97 , 023604 (2018).
  26. [38]S. van Enk and C. Beenakker, Physical review letters 108 , 110503 (2012).
  27. [39]A. Elben, B. Vermersch, M. Dalmonte, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Physical review letters 120 , 050406 (2018).
  28. [41]A. Elben, B. Vermersch, R. van Bijnen, C. Kokail, T. Brydges, C. Maier, M. K. Joshi, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Physical Review Letters 124 , 010504 (2020).
  29. [42]C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Physical Review A 54 , 3824 (1996).
  30. [43]C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Physical review letters 76 , 722 (1996).
  31. [44]E. Knill, D. Leibfried, R. Reichle, J. Britton, R. B. Blakestad, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, R. Ozeri, S. Seidelin, and D. J. Wineland, Physical Review A 77 , 012307 (2008).
  32. [48]F. Liu, R. Lundgren, P. Titum, G. Pagano, J. Zhang, C. Monroe, and A. V. Gorshkov, arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.02365 (2018). · arXiv
  33. [50]S. Moudgalya, S. Rachel, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Physical Review B 98 , 235155 (2018).
  34. [51]W. W. Ho, S. Choi, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Physical review letters 122 , 040603 (2019).
  35. [52]D. K. Mark, C.-J. Lin, and O. I. Motrunich, Physical Review B 101 , 195131 (2020).
  36. [53]N. Shibata, N. Yoshioka, and H. Katsura, Physical Review Letters 124 , 180604 (2020).
  37. [54]R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10 , 295 (2019).
  38. [55]S. Pai and M. Pretko, Physical Review Research 2 , 013094 (2020).
  39. [56]P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Physical Review X 10 , 011047 (2020).
  40. [59]A. Francis, J. Freericks, and A. Kemper, arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05701 (2019). · arXiv
  41. [60]A. Smith, B. Jobst, A. G. Green, and F. Pollmann, arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.05351 (2019). · arXiv
  42. [61]A. J. James, R. M. Konik, and N. J. Robinson, Physical review letters 122 , 130603 (2019).
  43. [64]M. Fagotti and P. Calabrese, Physical Review A 78 , 010306 (2008).
  44. [67]F. M. Surace and A. Lerose, arXiv:2011.10583 (2020). · arXiv
  45. [68]P. I. Karpov, G.-Y. Zhu, M. P. Heller, and M. Heyl1, arXiv:2011.11624 (2020). · arXiv
  46. [69]A. Milsted, J. Liu, J. Preskill, and G. Vidal, 'Collisions of false-vacuum bubble walls in a quantum spin chain,' (2020), arXiv:2012.07243 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  47. [72]S. Bravyi, J. M. Gambetta, A. Mezzacapo, and K. Temme, arXiv (2017), 1701.08213.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Vovrosh, J., Khosla, K. E., Greenaway, S., Self, C., Kim, M., & Knolle, J.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Vovrosh, Joseph
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
035309-035309
ISSN
2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2101.01690
arXiv
2101.01690
OpenAlex
W3158496541
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 9
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • Physical review. E (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T001062/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
error mitigation, quantum simulation, quantum many-body physics, entanglement measurement, quantum spin chains, confinement, meson masses, IBM quantum hardware

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.