The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Towards an Abolitionist AI: the role of Historically Black Colleges and Universities
Open accessAbstract
Abolition is the process of destroying and then rebuilding the structures that impede liberation. This paper addresses the particular case of Black folk in the United States, but is relevant to the global decolonization movement. Using notions of abolition and infrastructures of feeling developed by Ruth Wilson Gilmore, I view Historically Black Colleges and Universities ( HBCUs ) as a particular kind of abolitionist project, created for the explicit purpose of nurturing and sustaining Black excellence particularly within the sciences. I then examine how artificial intelligence (AI) in particular and computing in general have contributed to racial oppression and the further confinement and diminishing of Black existence. I conclude by examining how the space held by HBCUs in computing might contribute to a re-imagining of AI as a technology that enhances the possibility and actualization of Black life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Engaging in a decolonial ethics of AI amounts to working towards dismantling the colonial and racializing forces of/in AI technologies in education and rebuilding new technologies that are decolonized.
“Engaging in a decolonial ethics of AI would essentially amount to working towards dismantling the colonial and racializing forces of/in AI technologies in education and rebuilding new technologies that are decolonized (Earl 2021).”
From A decolonial approach to AI in higher education teaching and learning: strategies for undoing the ethics of digital neocolonialism (2023) · cites this paper as Earl 2021
Section 3 (pp. 2–3) describes AI practices that reinforce racial oppression and proposes liberatory design; Section 5 (p. 4) calls for AI ethics education and decisions about what should be built. These support the broader dismantling-and-rebuilding idea, but the paper does not specifically address colonial and racializing forces in AI technologies used in education or propose rebuilding educational technologies. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Douglas L. Allen. 2020. Black Geographies of Respite: Relief, Recuperation, and Resonance at Florida A & M University. Antipode (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12658 · DOI
- Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification.. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency .
- W. E. B. Du Bois. 1998. Black reconstruction in America: 1860-1880 . New York : The Free Press.
- Eugenio V. Garcia. 2019. The militarization of artificial intelligence: a wake-up call for the Global South. (September 2019). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3452323 · DOI
- M. Gasman and T. Nguyen. 2014. Historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs): Leading our nation's effort to improve the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pipeline. Texas Education Review 2, 1 (2014), 75-79.
- Ruth Wilson Gilmore. 2007. Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California . University of California Press.
- Ruth Wilson Gilmore. 2017. Abolition Geography and the Problem of Innocence. In Futures of Black Radicalism , G. T.. Johnson and A. Loubin (Eds.). New York: Verso, 225-240.
- Shakir Mohamed, Marie-Therese Png, and William Isaac. 2020. Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence. arXiv:2007.04068 [cs.CY] · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zembylas, M. (2023) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.2010094 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Earl, C. C.
- Corresponding author
- Earl, Charles C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2101.02011
- OpenAlex
- W3119610190
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- abolitionism, historically Black colleges and universities, artificial intelligence, racial oppression, decolonization, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Black liberation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
