Active learning for object detection in high-resolution satellite images
Open accessAbstract
In machine learning, the term active learning regroups techniques that aim at selecting the most useful data to label from a large pool of unlabelled examples. While supervised deep learning techniques have shown to be increasingly efficient on many applications, they require a huge number of labelled examples to reach operational performances. Therefore, the labelling effort linked to the creation of the datasets required is also increasing. When working on defense-related remote sensing applications, labelling can be challenging due to the large areas covered and often requires military experts who are rare and whose time is primarily dedicated to operational needs. Limiting the labelling effort is thus of utmost importance. This study aims at reviewing the most relevant active learning techniques to be used for object detection on very high resolution imagery and shows an example of the value of such techniques on a relevant operational use case: aircraft detection.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Active learning techniques focus on acquiring a large and diverse set of examples while reducing the time needed by researchers or professionals to screen data.
“A valid way to overcome these challenges lies in the application of ALtechniques [5-8], which focuses on the acquisition of a large and diverse set of examples, while reducing the time needed by researchers/professionals to screen the data.”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The Context (p. 1) says active learning selects relevant data to label and can make annotation faster by directing annotators to relevant images or zones. Related Work (pp. 2–3) describes diversity or representativeness as features of some methods. The paper does not characterize active learning generally as acquiring a large, diverse set; it emphasizes selecting a relevant subset within a labeling budget. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredActive learning approaches allow for reduction of human effort, optimising the annotation process, and increasing the ability to manage variability of the verification process and monitor the available annotation budget.
“With these issues in mind, AL approaches allow for not only the reduction of human effort, optimising the annotation process, but also for increasing the ability to manage the aspects regarding the variability of the verification process, as well as the monitoring of the available annotation budget along the operationalisation steps [6].”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Section 1.1 (p. 1) says active learning can minimize labelling effort and make annotation more efficient. Section 1.2 (p. 2) describes an iterative process that can stop when a maximum labelling budget is reached and accommodate changes in the data distribution. Neither passage addresses variability in the verification process, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredApplying one type of sampling strategy (e.g., uncertainty) tends to select similar images, resulting in an insufficient approach.
“Applying one type of sampling strategy (e.g., uncertainty) tends to select similar images [6], resulting in an insufficient approach [37].”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · see citing works
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
The Power of Ensembles for Active Learning in Image Classification
Beluch, W. H., Genewein, T., Nurnberger, A., & Kohler, J. M. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00976 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [1]1. Ash, J.T., Zhang, C., Krishnamurthy, A., Langford, J., Agarwal, A.: Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Bounds. In: ICLR (2020)
- [3]3. Budd, S., Robinson, E.C., Kainz, B.: A Survey on Active Learning and Human-in-theLoop Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02923 (2019) · arXiv
- [4]4. Casanova, A., Pinheiro, P.O., Rostamzadeh, N., Pal, C.J.: Reinforced active learning for image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.06583 (2020) · arXiv
- [5]5. Ducoffe, M., Precioso, F.: Adversarial active learning for deep networks: a margin based approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.09841 (2018) · arXiv
- [6]6. Gal, Y., Islam, R., Ghahramani, Z.: Deep bayesian active learning with image data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.02910 (2017) · arXiv
- [7]7. Gissin, D., Shalev-Shwartz, S.: Discriminative active learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06347 (2019) · arXiv
- [8]8. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., Bengio, Y.: Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. pp. 2672-2680 (2014), http://arxiv.org/abs/1406. 2661 , arXiv: 1406.2661 · arXiv
- [10]10. Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A.A., Milan, K., Quan, J., Ramalho, T., Grabska-Barwinska, A., others: Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 114 (13), 3521-3526 (2017), publisher: National Acad Sciences
- [12]12. Sener, O., Savarese, S.: Active learning for convolutional neural networks: A core-set approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.00489 (2017) · arXiv
- [13]13. Yoo, D., Kweon, I.S.: Learning loss for active learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 93-102 (2019)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review
Garcia, D., Carias, J., Adão, T., Jesus, R., Cunha, A., & Magalhães, L. G. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app131910667 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goupilleau, A., Ceillier, T., & Corbineau, M.-C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2101.02480
- OpenAlex
- W3118406937
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- active learning (machine learning), object detection, very high resolution satellite imagery, remote sensing, aircraft detection, military applications, dataset construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
