The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Towards Energy Efficient Federated Learning over 5G+ Mobile Devices
Open accessAbstract
The continuous convergence of machine learning algorithms, 5G and beyond (5G+) wireless communications, and artificial intelligence (AI) hardware implementation hastens the birth of federated learning (FL) over 5G+ mobile devices, which pushes AI functions to mobile devices and initiates a new era of on-device AI applications. Despite the remarkable progress made in FL, huge energy consumption is one of the most significant obstacles restricting the development of FL over battery-constrained 5G+ mobile devices. To address this issue, in this paper, we investigate how to develop energy efficient FL over 5G+ mobile devices by making a trade-off between energy consumption for "working" (i.e., local computing) and that for "talking" (i.e., wireless communications) in order to boost the overall energy efficiency. Specifically, we first examine energy consumption models for graphics processing unit (GPU) computation and wireless transmissions. Then, we overview the state of the art of integrating FL procedure with energy-efficient learning techniques (e.g., gradient sparsification, weight quantization, pruning, etc.). Finally, we present several potential future research directions for FL over 5G+ mobile devices from the perspective of energy efficiency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“FL is also important for structuring data streams from ubiquitous IoT devices that act as FL clients for performing local learning without sharing their data with external third-parties [153].”
From Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey (2021) · cites this paper as [153]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey
Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pathirana, P. N., Seneviratne, A., Li, J., & Vincent Poor, H. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3075439 · Cited by 1,503
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, D., Li, L., Chen, R., Prakash, P., Pan, M., & Fang, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2101.04866
- OpenAlex
- W4307065939
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- federated learning, energy efficiency, 5G mobile devices, on-device AI, energy consumption modeling, GPU computing, gradient sparsification, weight quantization, neural network pruning, energy efficiency trade-offs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review