CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 16Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Simulating Energy Transfer in Molecular Systems with Digital Quantum Computers

Open access
Lee, Chee-Kong, Lau, Jonathan Wei Zhong, Shi, Liang, Kwek, Leong Chuan·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2101.06879arXiv 2101.06879
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Quantum computers have the potential to simulate chemical systems beyond the capability of classical computers. Recent developments in hybrid quantum-classical approaches enable the determinations of the ground or low energy states of molecular systems. Here, we extend near-term quantum simulations of chemistry to time-dependent processes by simulating energy transfer in organic semiconducting molecules. We developed a multi-scale modeling workflow that combines conventional molecular dynamics and quantum chemistry simulations with hybrid variational quantum algorithm to compute the exciton dynamics in both the single excitation subspace (i.e. Frenkel Hamiltonian) and the full-Hilbert space (i.e. multi-exciton) regimes. Our numerical examples demonstrate the feasibility of our approach, and simulations on IBM Q devices capture the qualitative behaviors of exciton dynamics, but with considerable errors. We present an error mitigation technique that combines experimental results from the variational and Trotter algorithms, and obtain significantly improved quantum dynamics. Our approach opens up new opportunities for modeling quantum dynamics in chemical, biological and material systems with quantum computers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2101.06879

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VQS has been applied on the IBM quantum processor to simulate energy transfer in molecules and to simulate a time-dependent Hamiltonian.

    “VQS has been applied on the IBM quantum processor to simulate energy transfer in molecules (Lee et al. , 2021) as well as to simulate a time-dependent Hamiltonian (Lau et al. , 2021a).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Lee et al. , 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Kassal, I., Whitfield, J. D., Perdomo-Ortiz, A., Yung, M. H. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Simulating chemistry using quantum computers. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 62, 185-207 (2011).
  2. McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C. & Yuan, X. Quantum computa- tional chemistry. Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 15003 (2020).
  3. MacDonell, R. J. et al. Analog quantum simulation of chemical dynamics. Chemical Science 12, 9794-9805 (2021). arXiv:2012.01852. · arXiv
  4. Cerezo, M. et al. Variational Quantum Algorithms (2020). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 2012.09265. arXiv:2012.09265. · arXiv
  5. O'Malley, P. J. et al. Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies. Physical Review X 6, 1-13 (2016).
  6. Motta, M. et al. Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution. Nature Physics 16, 205-210 (2020). arXiv:1901.07653. · arXiv
  7. Hempel, C. et al. Quantum chemistry calculations on a trapped-ion quantum simulator. Phys. Rev. X 8, 31022 (2018).
  8. Parrish, R. M., Hohenstein, E. G., McMahon, P. L. & Martínez, T. J. Quantum Computation of Electronic Transitions Using a Variational Quantum Eigensolver. Physical Review Letters 122, 230401 (2019).
  9. Takeshita, T. et al. Increasing the Representation Accuracy of Quantum Simulations of Chem- istry without Extra Quantum Resources. Phys. Rev. X 10, 11004 (2020).
  10. McCaskey, A. J. et al. Quantum chemistry as a benchmark for near-term quantum computers. npj Quantum Information 5, 99 (2019).
  11. Mukamel, S. Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford, New York, 1995).
  12. Nitzan, A. Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molecular Systems. Oxford Graduate Texts (OUP Oxford, 2013).
  13. Gatti, F., Lasorne, B., Meyer, H.-D. & Nauts, A. Applications of Quantum Dynamics in Chemistry, vol. 98 of Lecture Notes in Chemistry (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017). URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-53923-2. · DOI
  14. Berry, D. W., Ahokas, G., Cleve, R. & Sanders, B. C. Efficient quantum algorithms for sim- ulating sparse hamiltonians. Communications in Mathematical Physics 270, 359-371 (2007). arXiv:0508139.
  15. Heya, K., Nakanishi, K. M., Mitarai, K. & Fujii, K. Subspace Variational Quantum Simulator (2019). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.08566. arXiv:1904.08566. · arXiv
  16. Zhang, Z.-J., Sun, J., Yuan, X. & Yung, M.-H. Low-depth Hamiltonian Simulation by Adaptive Product Formula (2020). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.05283. arXiv:2011.05283. · arXiv
  17. Ollitrault, P. J., Mazzola, G. & Tavernelli, I. Nonadiabatic Molecular Quantum Dynamics with Quantum Computers. Physical Review Letters 125, 260511 (2020).
  18. Lee, C.-K., Hsieh, C.-Y., Zhang, S. & Shi, L. Simulation of Condensed-Phase Spectroscopy with Near-Term Digital Quantum Computers. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation acs.jctc.1c00849 (2021).
  19. Low, G. H. & Chuang, I. L. Optimal Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing. Physical Review Letters 118, 010501 (2017).
  20. Low, G. H. & Chuang, I. L. Hamiltonian Simulation by Qubitization. Quantum 3, 163 (2019).
  21. Li, Y. & Benjamin, S. C. Efficient Variational Quantum Simulator Incorporating Active Error Minimization. Physical Review X 7, 021050 (2017).
  22. Endo, S., Sun, J., Li, Y., Benjamin, S. C. & Yuan, X. Variational Quantum Simulation of General Processes. Physical Review Letters 125, 010501 (2020). arXiv:1812.08778. · arXiv
  23. Chen, M.-c. et al. Demonstration of Adiabatic Variational Quantum Computing with a Su- perconducting Quantum Coprocessor. Physical Review Letters 125, 180501 (2020).
  24. Temme, K., Bravyi, S. & Gambetta, J. M. Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Cir- cuits. Physical Review Letters 119, 180509 (2017).
  25. McClean, J. R., Kimchi-Schwartz, M. E., Carter, J. & de Jong, W. A. Hybrid quantum- classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and determination of excited states. Physical Review A 95, 042308 (2017).
  26. Kim, C., Park, K. D. & Rhee, J.-K. Quantum Error Mitigation With Artificial Neural Network. IEEE Access 8, 188853-188860 (2020).
  27. Perepichka, I. F., Perepichka, D. F. & Meng, H. Thiophene-Based Materials for Electro- luminescent Applications, vol. 2 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2009). URL http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9780470745533.ch19. · DOI
  28. Wecker, D., Hastings, M. B. & Troyer, M. Progress towards practical quantum variational algorithms. Physical Review A 92, 042303 (2015).
  29. Yao, Y.-X. et al. Adaptive Variational Quantum Dynamics Simulations. PRX Quantum 2, 1 (2021).
  30. Lee, C. K., Patil, P., Zhang, S. & Hsieh, C. Y. Neural-network variational quantum algorithm for simulating many-body dynamics. Physical Review Research 3, 023095 (2021).
  31. Shi, L. & Willard, A. P. Modeling the effects of molecular disorder on the properties of Frenkel excitons in organic molecular semiconductors. The Journal of Chemical Physics 149, 094110 (2018).
  32. Mohseni, M., Rebentrost, P., Lloyd, S. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Environment-assisted quantum walks in photosynthetic energy transfer. Journal of Chemical Physics 129 (2008).
  33. Rebentrost, P., Mohseni, M., Kassal, I., Lloyd, S. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Environment-assisted quantum transport. New Journal of Physics 11 (2009).
  34. McArdle, S., Mayorov, A., Shan, X., Benjamin, S. & Yuan, X. Digital quantum simulation of molecular vibrations. Chemical Science 10, 5725-5735 (2019). arXiv:1811.04069. · arXiv
  35. Sawaya, N. P. & Huh, J. Quantum Algorithm for Calculating Molecular Vibronic Spectra. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 10, 3586-3591 (2019).
  36. May, V. Kinetic theory of exciton-exciton annihilation. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 054103 (2014).
  37. Wu, Y. et al. Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor (2021). arXiv:2106.14734v1. · arXiv
  38. DuBay, K. H. et al. Accurate Force Field Development for Modeling Conjugated Polymers. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 8, 4556-4569 (2012).
  39. Bowers, K. J. et al. Scalable algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations on commodity clusters. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing -SC '06, 84 (ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 2006).
  40. Lu, C. et al. Deep Learning for Optoelectronic Properties of Organic Semiconductors. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 124, 7048-7060 (2020).
  41. Sun, Q. et al. PySCF: the Python-based simulations of chemistry framework. Wiley Interdis- ciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 8, e1340 (2018).
  42. Farahvash, A., Lee, C. K., Sun, Q., Shi, L. & Willard, A. P. Machine learning Frenkel Hamiltonian parameters to accelerate simulations of exciton dynamics. Journal of Chemical Physics 153 (2020).
  43. Lee, C. K. & Willard, A. P. Representing the Molecular Signatures of Disordered Molecular Semiconductors in Size-Extendable Models of Exciton Dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 124, 5238-5245 (2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, C.-K., Lau, J. W. Z., Shi, L., & Kwek, L. C.
Affiliations
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
  • Centre for Quantum Technologies (SG)
  • University of California, Merced (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, Chee-Kong
  • Lau, Jonathan Wei Zhong
  • Shi, Liang
  • Kwek, Leong Chuan
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
1347-1358
ISSN
1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2101.06879
arXiv
2101.06879
OpenAlex
W3121945124
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • NIE Digital Repository (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • University of California
  • National Research Foundation Singapore
  • Ministry of Education - Singapore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Keywords
energy transfer, exciton dynamics, organic semiconductors, hybrid quantum-classical simulation, variational quantum algorithms, multiexciton states, error mitigation, multiscale modeling, molecular dynamics, IBM Q

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review