The DOI matches its DataCite record, with a small difference in title or year; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transformer in Transformer
Open accessAbstract
Transformer is a new kind of neural architecture which encodes the input data as powerful features via the attention mechanism. Basically, the visual transformers first divide the input images into several local patches and then calculate both representations and their relationship. Since natural images are of high complexity with abundant detail and color information, the granularity of the patch dividing is not fine enough for excavating features of objects in different scales and locations. In this paper, we point out that the attention inside these local patches are also essential for building visual transformers with high performance and we explore a new architecture, namely, Transformer iN Transformer (TNT). Specifically, we regard the local patches (e.g., 16$\times$16) as "visual sentences" and present to further divide them into smaller patches (e.g., 4$\times$4) as "visual words". The attention of each word will be calculated with other words in the given visual sentence with negligible computational costs. Features of both words and sentences will be aggregated to enhance the representation ability. Experiments on several benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed TNT architecture, e.g., we achieve an 81.5% top-1 accuracy on the ImageNet, which is about 1.7% higher than that of the state-of-the-art visual transformer with similar computational cost. The PyTorch code is available at https://github.com/huawei-noah/CV-Backbones, and the MindSpore code is available at https://gitee.com/mindspore/models/tree/master/research/cv/TNT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, in multi-tenant architectures, system prompts are shared across multiple requests and frequently contain detailed instructions or examples to guide the model [19].”
From HotPrefix: Hotness-Aware KV Cache Scheduling for Efficient Prefix Sharing in LLM Inference Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“PromptCache [19] proposes modular reuse beyond prefixes but sacrifices accuracy, with reported performance drops of up to 43% [72], making it unsuitable for tasks requiring high precision.”
From HotPrefix: Hotness-Aware KV Cache Scheduling for Efficient Prefix Sharing in LLM Inference Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“related experiments results further demonstrate ViT also has remarkable representation capacity when dealing with images and videos [19].”
From Deepfake Video Detection with Spatiotemporal Dropout Transformer (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · cited 6×
“Compared to CNNs, TNT can outperform the widely-used ResNet and RegNet.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 3×
“The effect of #heads in standard transformer has been investigated in multiple works [21, 35] and a head width of 64 is recommended for visual tasks [9, 31].”
BackgroundMethodImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 1×
“In the past decade, the mainstream deep neural architectures used in the computer vision (CV) are mainly established on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [17, 12, 11].”
BackgroundFaster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472 · cited 1×
“As a general backbone network, TNT can also be applied with multi-scale vision models like Faster RCNN [29].”
MethodBERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 47,472 · cited 7×
“The recent transformerbased models like ViT [9] and DeiT [31] are compared.”
MethodInfluentialImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · cited 3×
“ImageNet ILSVRC 2012 [26] is an image classification benchmark consisting of 1.”
BackgroundInfluentialSqueeze-and-Excitation NetworksPreprint
Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2017) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.01507 · Cited by 37,845 · cited 1×
“Inspired by squeeze-and-excitation (SE) network for CNNs [16], we propose to explore channel-wise attention for transformers.”
MethodPyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939 · cited 2×
“We evaluate TNT-S and DeiT-S on Faster RCNN with FPN [21].”
BackgroundMethod
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [6][6] Mark Chen, Alec Radford, Rewon Child, Jeffrey Wu, Heewoo Jun, David Luan, and Ilya Sutskever. Generative pretraining from pixels. In ICML , 2020. -
- [11][11] Kai Han, Yunhe Wang, Hanting Chen, Xinghao Chen, Jianyuan Guo, Zhenhua Liu, Yehui Tang, An Xiao, Chunjing Xu, Yixing Xu, et al. A survey on vision transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.12556 , 2020. - · arXiv
- [23][23] Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [26][26] Omkar M Parkhi, Andrea Vedaldi, Andrew Zisserman, and CV Jawahar. Cats and dogs. In CVPR , pages 3498-3505. IEEE, 2012. -
- [37][37] Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research , 9(11), 2008. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,009 of 1,009
Predicting rutting in asphalt pavement of RIOH track using multiple machine learning approaches
Ji, J., Wu, N., Ling, M., Wang, Z., & Zhang, R. (2025) · International Journal on Road Materials and Pavement Design · doi:10.1080/14680629.2025.2517616 · Cited by 5
Esmaeilzehi, A., Zaredar, H., Ahmadi, R., & Ahmad, M. O. (2025) · Multimedia tools and applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-025-20946-4 · Cited by 5
“Transformer-in-transformer (TNT) [ 44] is another state-of-the-art visual transformer-based neural network that is designed for high-level computer vision tasks.”
Peng, Z.-L., Huang, Y., Xu, Z.-Q., Tang, F., Hu, M., Yang, X.-K., & Shen, W. (2025) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.02355 · Cited by 5
“Since the introduction of ViT [11], Transformers and attention mechanisms have become widely adopted in computer vision tasks [10, 15, 32, 33, 46, 47, 51, 52, 54].”
Large Language Model-assisted multi-scale hierarchical classification of ECG signals
Chen, Q., Lian, C., Xu, B., Zhou, Q., Su, Y., & Zeng, Z. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113807 · Cited by 5
Guesmi, A., Ouni, B., & Shafique, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.19613 · Cited by 5
“For ViT-to-ViT, we use four unseen target ViTs: DeiT-B [33], TNT-S [15], LeViT-256 [11], and ConViT-B [8].”
Gong, Z., Wang, Z., Chao, L., Nienkötter, A., Wang, J., Ren, C., & Peng, X. (2025) · Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2024jb030069 · Cited by 2
Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformer
Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Han, K., Ma, S., & Gao, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.14156 · Cited by 192
“[15] proposed a Transformer-iN-Transformer (TNT) model for modeling both patch-level and pixel-level representation.”
MethodSelf-citationCost-Efficient Large Language Model Serving for Multi-turn Conversations with CachedAttention
Gao, B., He, Z., Sharma, P., Kang, Q., Jevdjic, D., Deng, J., Yang, X., Yu, Z., & Zuo, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.19708 · Cited by 1
“The widely used LLMs like GPTs [29] and LLaMAs [44,45] are built upon the autoregressive transformer architecture [16, 47].”
MethodKong, Z., Li, Y., Zeng, F., Xin, L., Messica, S., Lin, X., Zhao, P., Kellis, M., Tang, H., & Zitnik, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18227 · Cited by 51
“Transformer-based generative models [15, 27, 44, 134, 163] have emerged as dominant deep learning architectures across vision, language, and multimodal tasks, due to their ability to process long sequences of tokens, which are the fundamental representational units derived from raw data such as…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, K., Xiao, A., Wu, E., Guo, J., Xu, C., & Wang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
- University of Macau (MO)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 34
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2103.00112
- OpenAlex
- W3133696297
- Cited by
- 1,394
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 276 · 2024: 457 · 2023: 387 · 2022: 186 · 2021: 74
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (0015/2019/AKP, 62072449, 61632003, 0018/2019/AKP)
- Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ciências e da Tecnologia (0018/2019/AKP, 0015/2019/AKP)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- vision transformer, attention mechanism, local patches, visual words, image classification, feature aggregation, computational efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
