PreprintCited by 814Advanced Image Processing TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising MethodsImage Enhancement Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Designing a Practical Degradation Model for Deep Blind Image Super-Resolution

Open access
Zhang, Kai, Liang, Jingyun, Van Gool, Luc, Timofte, Radu·2021·arXiv

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that single image super-resolution (SISR) methods would not perform well if the assumed degradation model deviates from those in real images. Although several degradation models take additional factors into consideration, such as blur, they are still not effective enough to cover the diverse degradations of real images. To address this issue, this paper proposes to design a more complex but practical degradation model that consists of randomly shuffled blur, downsampling and noise degradations. Specifically, the blur is approximated by two convolutions with isotropic and anisotropic Gaussian kernels; the downsampling is randomly chosen from nearest, bilinear and bicubic interpolations; the noise is synthesized by adding Gaussian noise with different noise levels, adopting JPEG compression with different quality factors, and generating processed camera sensor noise via reverse-forward camera image signal processing (ISP) pipeline model and RAW image noise model. To verify the effectiveness of the new degradation model, we have trained a deep blind ESRGAN super-resolver and then applied it to super-resolve both synthetic and real images with diverse degradations. The experimental results demonstrate that the new degradation model can help to significantly improve the practicability of deep super-resolvers, thus providing a powerful alternative solution for real SISR applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2103.14006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the BSR-degradation process with the original parameters as in [105] leads to a very strong degradation process.

    “We found that using the bsr-degredation process with the original parameters as in [105] leads to a very strong degradation process.”

    From High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models (2022) · cites this paper as [105]

  • The BSR-degradation process applies JPEG compression noise, camera sensor noise, different image interpolations for downsampling, Gaussian blur kernels and Gaussian noise in a random order to an image.

    “The BSR-degradation process is a degradation pipline which applies JPEG compressions noise, camera sensor noise, different image interpolations for downsampling, Gaussian blur kernels and Gaussian noise in a random order to an image.”

    From High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models (2022) · cites this paper as [105]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Eirikur Agustsson and Radu Timofte. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study. In CVPR Workshops, volume 3, pages 126-135, July 2017. 6
  2. Sefi Bell-Kligler, Assaf Shocher, and Michal Irani. Blind super-resolution kernel estimation using an internal-gan. In NeurIPS, pages 284-293, 2019. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7
  3. Yochai Blau, Roey Mechrez, Radu Timofte, Tomer Michaeli, and Lihi Zelnik-Manor. The 2018 PIRM challenge on per- ceptual image super-resolution. In ECCV Workshops, 2018.
  4. Yochai Blau and Tomer Michaeli. The perception-distortion tradeoff. In CVPR, pages 6228-6237, 2018. 6
  5. Tim Brooks, Ben Mildenhall, Tianfan Xue, Jiawen Chen, Dillon Sharlet, and Jonathan T Barron. Unprocessing images for learned raw denoising. In CVPR, pages 11036-11045, 2019.
  6. Jianrui Cai, Hui Zeng, Hongwei Yong, Zisheng Cao, and Lei Zhang. Toward real-world single image super-resolution: A new benchmark and a new model. In ICCV, pages 3086- 3095, 2019. 3
  7. Victor Cornillere, Abdelaziz Djelouah, Wang Yifan, Olga Sorkine-Hornung, and Christopher Schroers. Blind image super-resolution with spatially variant degradations. ACM TOG, 38(6):1-13, 2019.
  8. Ekin D Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Jonathon Shlens, and Quoc V Le. Randaugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space. In CVPR Workshops, pages 702-703, 2020. 5
  9. Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution. In ECCV, pages 184-199, 2014. 1
  10. Weisheng Dong, Lei Zhang, Guangming Shi, and Xin Li. Nonlocally centralized sparse representation for image restoration. IEEE TIP, 22(4):1620-1630, 2013. 2, 3
  11. Netalee Efrat, Daniel Glasner, Alexander Apartsin, Boaz Nadler, and Anat Levin. Accurate blur models vs. image pri- ors in single image super-resolution. In ICCV, pages 2832- 2839, 2013. 1, 3
  12. Manuel Fritsche, Shuhang Gu, and Radu Timofte. Frequency separation for real-world super-resolution. In ICCV Work- shop, pages 3599-3608, 2019. 7, 8
  13. Michael D Grossberg and Shree K Nayar. What is the space of camera response functions? In CVPR, pages II-602, 2003. 5
  14. Jinjin Gu, Haoming Cai, Haoyu Chen, Xiaoxing Ye, Jimmy Ren, and Chao Dong. Pipal: a large-scale image quality as- sessment dataset for perceptual image restoration. ECCV, 2020. 8
  15. Jinjin Gu, Hannan Lu, Wangmeng Zuo, and Chao Dong. Blind super-resolution with iterative kernel correction. In CVPR, pages 1604-1613, 2019. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
  16. Zheng Hui, Xinbo Gao, Yunchu Yang, and Xiumei Wang. Lightweight image super-resolution with information multi- distillation network. In ICME, pages 2024-2032, 2019. 1
  17. Andrey Ignatov, Nikolay Kobyshev, Radu Timofte, Kenneth Vanhoey, and Luc Van Gool. DSLR-quality photos on mo- bile devices with deep convolutional networks. In ICCV, pages 3277-3285, 2017. 6
  18. Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adver- sarial networks. In CVPR, pages 1125-1134, 2017. 6
  19. Xiaozhong Ji, Yun Cao, Ying Tai, Chengjie Wang, Jilin Li, and Feiyue Huang. Real-world super-resolution via kernel estimation and noise injection. In CVPR Workshops, pages 466-467, 2020. 2, 3, 7, 8
  20. Jiaxi Jiang, Kai Zhang, and Radu Timofte. Towards flexible blind JPEG artifacts removal. In ICCV, 2021. 6
  21. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In CVPR, pages 4401-4410, 2019. 6
  22. Wei-Sheng Lai, Jia-Bin Huang, Narendra Ahuja, and Ming- Hsuan Yang. Deep laplacian pyramid networks for fast and accurate super-resolution. In CVPR, pages 624-632, July 2017. 1, 2
  23. Christian Ledig, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Huszár, Jose Caballero, Andrew Cunningham, Alejandro Acosta, Andrew Aitken, Alykhan Tejani, Johannes Totz, Zehan Wang, et al. Photo- realistic single image super-resolution using a generative ad- versarial network. In CVPR, pages 4681-4690, July 2017. 1, 6
  24. Jingyun Liang, Andreas Lugmayr, Kai Zhang, Martin Danelljan, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Hierarchi- cal conditional flow: A unified framework for image super- resolution and image rescaling. In ICCV, 2021. 1
  25. Jingyun Liang, Kai Zhang, Shuhang Gu, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Flow-based kernel prior with application to blind super-resolution. In CVPR, pages 10601-10610, 2021.
  26. Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In CVPR Workshops, pages 136- 144, July 2017. 1, 6
  27. Ce Liu and Deqing Sun. On bayesian adaptive video super resolution. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Ma- chine Intelligence, 36(2):346-360, 2013. 1, 3, 4
  28. Andreas Lugmayr, Martin Danelljan, and Radu Timofte. Un- supervised learning for real-world super-resolution. In ICCV Workshop, pages 3408-3416, 2019. 2, 3
  29. Andreas Lugmayr, Martin Danelljan, and Radu Timofte. Ntire 2020 challenge on real-world image super-resolution: Methods and results. In CVPR Workshops, pages 494-495, 2020. 3, 8
  30. Zhengxiong Luo, Yan Huang, Shang Li, Liang Wang, and Tieniu Tan. Unfolding the alternating optimization for blind super resolution. NeurIPS, 33, 2020. 2, 3
  31. Kede Ma, Zhengfang Duanmu, Qingbo Wu, Zhou Wang, Hongwei Yong, Hongliang Li, and Lei Zhang. Waterloo ex- ploration database: New challenges for image quality assess- ment models. IEEE TIP, 26(2):1004-1016, 2017. 6
  32. Henrique S Malvar, Li-wei He, and Ross Cutler. High- quality linear interpolation for demosaicing of bayer- patterned color images. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 3, pages iii-485, 2004.
  33. D. Martin, C. Fowlkes, D. Tal, and J. Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecologi- cal statistics. In ICCV, volume 2, pages 416-423, 2001. 6
  34. Yusuke Matsui, Kota Ito, Yuji Aramaki, Azuma Fujimoto, Toru Ogawa, Toshihiko Yamasaki, and Kiyoharu Aizawa. Sketch-based manga retrieval using manga109 dataset. Mul- timedia Tools and Applications, 76(20):21811-21838, 2017.
  35. Tomer Michaeli and Michal Irani. Nonparametric blind super-resolution. In ICCV, pages 945-952, 2013. 2
  36. Anish Mittal, Rajiv Soundararajan, and Alan C Bovik. Mak- ing a "completely blind" image quality analyzer. IEEE SPL, 20(3):209-212, 2012. 8
  37. Seonghyeon Nam, Youngbae Hwang, Yasuyuki Matsushita, and Seon Joo Kim. A holistic approach to cross-channel im- age noise modeling and its application to image denoising. In CVPR, pages 1683-1691, 2016. 4
  38. Sangwoo Park, Erchin Serpedin, and Khalid Qaraqe. Gaus- sian assumption: The least favorable but the most useful [lec- ture notes]. IEEE SPM, 30(3):183-186, 2013. 4
  39. Tomer Peleg and Michael Elad. A statistical prediction model based on sparse representations for single image super-resolution. IEEE TIP, 23(6):2569-2582, 2014. 2
  40. Tobias Plotz and Stefan Roth. Benchmarking denoising al- gorithms with real photographs. In CVPR, pages 1586-1595, 2017. 2, 4
  41. Gernot Riegler, Samuel Schulter, Matthias Ruther, and Horst Bischof. Conditioned regression models for non-blind single image super-resolution. In ICCV, pages 522-530, 2015. 3, 4
  42. Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Michael Hirsch. Enhancenet: Single image super-resolution through automated texture synthesis. In ICCV, pages 4501-4510, 2017. 2
  43. Assaf Shocher, Nadav Cohen, and Michal Irani. "zero-shot" super-resolution using deep internal learning. In ICCV, pages 3118-3126, 2018. 1, 3, 4
  44. Radu Timofte, Eirikur Agustsson, Luc Van Gool, Ming- Hsuan Yang, and Lei Zhang. Ntire 2017 challenge on sin- gle image super-resolution: Methods and results. In CVPR Workshops, pages 114-125, 2017. 1, 6
  45. Radu Timofte, Vincent De Smet, and Luc Van Gool. A+: Adjusted anchored neighborhood regression for fast super- resolution. In ACCV, pages 111-126, 2014. 1
  46. Longguang Wang, Yingqian Wang, Xiaoyu Dong, Qingyu Xu, Jungang Yang, Wei An, and Yulan Guo. Unsuper- vised degradation representation learning for blind super- resolution. In CVPR, pages 10581-10590, 2021. 3
  47. Xintao Wang, Ke Yu, Shixiang Wu, Jinjin Gu, Yihao Liu, Chao Dong, Yu Qiao, and Chen Change Loy. ESRGAN: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks. In ECCV Workshops, 2018. 1, 6, 7, 8
  48. Pengxu Wei, Hannan Lu, Radu Timofte, Liang Lin, Wang- meng Zuo, et al. Aim 2020 challenge on real image super- resolution: Methods and results. In ECCV Workshops, 2020. 3
  49. Yuan Yuan, Siyuan Liu, Jiawei Zhang, Yongbing Zhang, Chao Dong, and Liang Lin. Unsupervised image super- resolution using cycle-in-cycle generative adversarial net- works. In CVPR Workshops, pages 701-710, 2018. 2, 3
  50. Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Deep un- folding network for image super-resolution. In CVPR, pages 3217-3226, 2020. 1, 3, 4
  51. Kai Zhang, Yawei Li, Wangmeng Zuo, Lei Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Plug-and-play image restora- tion with deep denoiser prior. IEEE TPAMI, 2021. 2
  52. Kai Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Hongzhi Zhang, and Wangmeng Zuo. Revisiting single image super-resolution under inter- net environment: blur kernels and reconstruction algorithms. In Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia, pages 677-687, 2015. 2
  53. Kai Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, Yunjin Chen, Deyu Meng, and Lei Zhang. Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE TIP, pages 3142- 3155, 2017. 6
  54. Kai Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, Shuhang Gu, and Lei Zhang. Learning deep CNN denoiser prior for image restoration. In CVPR, pages 3929-3938, July 2017. 2, 3
  55. Kai Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, and Lei Zhang. FFDNet: To- ward a fast and flexible solution for CNN-based image de- noising. IEEE TIP, 27(9):4608-4622, 2018. 6
  56. Kai Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, and Lei Zhang. Learning a single convolutional super-resolution network for multiple degradations. In CVPR, pages 3262-3271, 2018. 1, 2, 3, 4
  57. Kai Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, and Lei Zhang. Deep plug-and- play super-resolution for arbitrary blur kernels. In CVPR, pages 1671-1681, 2019. 2, 5
  58. Yulun Zhang, Kunpeng Li, Kai Li, Lichen Wang, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks. In ECCV, pages 286- 301, 2018. 2
  59. Yulun Zhang, Yapeng Tian, Yu Kong, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Residual dense network for image super-resolution. In ICCV, pages 2472-2481, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, K., Liang, J., Van Gool, L., & Timofte, R.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Pages
4771-4780
OpenAlex
W3137506875
Cited by
814
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 234 · 2024: 240 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 17
FWCI
38.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
Keywords
single image super-resolution, blind super-resolution, degradation modeling, downsampling, synthetic training images

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review