On the Quenched Free Energy of JT Gravity and Supergravity
Open accessAbstract
The quenched free energy, $F_Q(T){=}{-}T\langle \ln Z(T)\rangle$, of various JT gravity and supergravity theories is explored, taking into account the key non-perturbative physics that is accessible using their matrix model formulations. The leading low energy physics of these systems can be modelled by the Airy and (a family of) Bessel models, which arise from scaling limits of matrix ensembles. The $F_Q(T)$s of these models are directly computed by explicit sampling of the matrix ensembles, and how their properties are connected to the statistical mechanics of the underlying discrete spectrum of the ensembles is elucidated. Some of the low temperature ($T$) features of the results confirm recent observations by Jassen and Mirbabayi. The results are then used as benchmarks for exploring an intriguing formula proposed by Okuyama for computing $F_Q(T)$ in terms of the connected correlators of its partition function, the wormholes of the gravity theory. A low $T$ truncation of the correlators helps render the formula practical, but it is shown that this is at the expense of much of its accuracy. The significance of the statistical interpretation of $F_Q(T)$ for black hole microphysics is discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For the free energy of a system, one should compute the quenched free energy, not the annealed free energy, where the brackets denote the gravitational path integral.
“For example, for the free energy of the system, one should compute the quenched free energy , and not the annealed free energy , where the brackets denote the gravitational path integral.”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Johnson 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- [36]N. Benjamin, C. A. Keller, H. Ooguri, and I. G. Zadeh, (2021), arXiv:2103.15826 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [37]O. Janssen, M. Mirbabayi, and P. Zograf, (2021), arXiv:2103.12078 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [38][H. Verlinde, (2021), arXiv:2105.02129 [hep-th].](http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02129) · arXiv
- [39][H. Verlinde, (2021), arXiv:2105.02142 [hep-th].](http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02142) · arXiv
- [40]P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, (2018), arXiv:1806.06840 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [45]E. P. Wigner, Ann. Math. 62 , 548 (1955). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1970079
- [46]J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, JHEP 08 , 106 (2016), arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [47]D. Stanford and E. Witten, (2019), arXiv:1907.03363 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [48]S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 5 , 965 (1975).
- [49]N. Engelhardt, S. Fischetti, and A. Maloney, Phys. Rev. D 103 , 046021 (2021), arXiv:2007.07444 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [50]G. Parisi, J. Phys. A 13 , L115 (1980). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/4/009 · DOI
- [51]G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 , 1754 (1979). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1754 · DOI · Paper page
- [53]C. V. Johnson, (2020), arXiv:2008.13120 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [54]K. Okuyama, JHEP 03 , 073 (2021), arXiv:2101.05990 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [55]C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Commun. Math. Phys. 159 , 151 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9211141 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [56]P. Forrester, Nuclear Physics B 402 , 709 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(9390126-A) · DOI
- [58]P. J. Forrester and T. D. Hughes, Journal of Mathematical Physics 35 , 6736 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.530639. · DOI
- [59]O. Janssen and M. Mirbabayi, (2021), arXiv:2103.03896 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [60]C. V. Johnson, (2021), arXiv:2106.09048 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [61]J. Wishart, Biometrika 20A , 32 (1928). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2331939
- [62]B. V. Bronk, Journal of Mathematical Physics 6 , 228 (1965), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1704274. · DOI
- [64]K. Okuyama, JHEP 12 , 080 (2020), arXiv:2009.02840 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [65]A. Perret and G. Schehr, Journal of Statistical Physics 156 , 843?876 (2014).
- [66]P. J. Forrester and N. S. Witte, Kyushu Journal of Mathematics 61 , 457 (2007).
- [68]A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rev. B55 , 1142 (1997), arXiv:cond-mat/9602137 [cond-mat]. · arXiv
- [70]C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Commun. Math. Phys. 161 , 289 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9304063 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [71]C. V. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 101 , 106023 (2020), arXiv:1912.03637 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [72]C. V. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 103 , 046013 (2021), arXiv:2006.10959 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [74]J. E. Carlisle, C. V. Johnson, and J. S. Pennington, J. Phys. A40 , 12451 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0501006 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [75]J. E. Carlisle, C. V. Johnson, and J. S. Pennington, J. Phys. A41 , 085401 (2008), arXiv:hep-th/0511002 [hepth]. · arXiv
- [79]A. M. Ostrowski, Proc. Nat. Ac. Sc., Washington 35 , 612 (1949).
- [81]J. W. L. Glaisher, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 48 , 53 (1874). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786447408641072 · DOI
- [82]J. O'Kinealy, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 48 , 295 (1874).
- [84]T. Amdeberhan, O. Espinosa, I. Gonzalez, M. Harrison, V. H. Moll, and A. Straub, The Ramanujan Journal 29 , 103 (2012).
- [88]P. H. Ginsparg and G. W. Moore, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles (1993) pp. 277-469, arXiv:hepth/9304011.
- [89]K. Okuyama, JHEP 10 , 037 (2018), arXiv:1808.10161 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [90]K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, JHEP 01 , 156 (2020), arXiv:1911.01659 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [91]E. T. Bell, Annals of Mathematics 29 , 38 (1927). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1967979
- [92]P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis, and D. K. Kolchmeyer, (2021), arXiv:2104.01184 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [93]C. V. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 103 , 046012 (2021), arXiv:2005.01893 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [94]L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci, (2020), arXiv:2003.02860 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [95]M. Heydeman, L. V. Iliesiu, G. J. Turiaci, and W. Zhao, (2020), arXiv:2011.01953 [hep-th]. · arXiv
- [96]S. D. Mathur, Fortsch. Phys. 53 , 793 (2005), arXiv:hepth/0502050.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity
Mertens, T. G., & Turiaci, G. J. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00046-1 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
- Authors
- Johnson, C. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Clifford V.
- ORCID
- Johnson, Clifford V.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2104.02733
- OpenAlex
- W3149647163
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Random Matrices and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
- Keywords
- quenched free energy, JT gravity, supergravity, matrix models, wormholes, black hole microstates, low-temperature limit
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review