PreprintCited by 10Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRandom Matrices and ApplicationsQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

On the Quenched Free Energy of JT Gravity and Supergravity

Open access
Johnson, Clifford V.·2021·arXiv

Abstract

The quenched free energy, $F_Q(T){=}{-}T\langle \ln Z(T)\rangle$, of various JT gravity and supergravity theories is explored, taking into account the key non-perturbative physics that is accessible using their matrix model formulations. The leading low energy physics of these systems can be modelled by the Airy and (a family of) Bessel models, which arise from scaling limits of matrix ensembles. The $F_Q(T)$s of these models are directly computed by explicit sampling of the matrix ensembles, and how their properties are connected to the statistical mechanics of the underlying discrete spectrum of the ensembles is elucidated. Some of the low temperature ($T$) features of the results confirm recent observations by Jassen and Mirbabayi. The results are then used as benchmarks for exploring an intriguing formula proposed by Okuyama for computing $F_Q(T)$ in terms of the connected correlators of its partition function, the wormholes of the gravity theory. A low $T$ truncation of the correlators helps render the formula practical, but it is shown that this is at the expense of much of its accuracy. The significance of the statistical interpretation of $F_Q(T)$ for black hole microphysics is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2104.02733

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the free energy of a system, one should compute the quenched free energy, not the annealed free energy, where the brackets denote the gravitational path integral.

    “For example, for the free energy of the system, one should compute the quenched free energy , and not the annealed free energy , where the brackets denote the gravitational path integral.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. [36]N. Benjamin, C. A. Keller, H. Ooguri, and I. G. Zadeh, (2021), arXiv:2103.15826 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  2. [37]O. Janssen, M. Mirbabayi, and P. Zograf, (2021), arXiv:2103.12078 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  3. [38][H. Verlinde, (2021), arXiv:2105.02129 [hep-th].](http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02129) · arXiv
  4. [39][H. Verlinde, (2021), arXiv:2105.02142 [hep-th].](http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02142) · arXiv
  5. [40]P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, (2018), arXiv:1806.06840 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  6. [45]E. P. Wigner, Ann. Math. 62 , 548 (1955). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1970079
  7. [46]J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, JHEP 08 , 106 (2016), arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  8. [47]D. Stanford and E. Witten, (2019), arXiv:1907.03363 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  9. [48]S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 5 , 965 (1975).
  10. [49]N. Engelhardt, S. Fischetti, and A. Maloney, Phys. Rev. D 103 , 046021 (2021), arXiv:2007.07444 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  11. [50]G. Parisi, J. Phys. A 13 , L115 (1980). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/4/009 · DOI
  12. [51]G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 , 1754 (1979). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1754 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [53]C. V. Johnson, (2020), arXiv:2008.13120 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  14. [54]K. Okuyama, JHEP 03 , 073 (2021), arXiv:2101.05990 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  15. [55]C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Commun. Math. Phys. 159 , 151 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9211141 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  16. [56]P. Forrester, Nuclear Physics B 402 , 709 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(9390126-A) · DOI
  17. [58]P. J. Forrester and T. D. Hughes, Journal of Mathematical Physics 35 , 6736 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.530639. · DOI
  18. [59]O. Janssen and M. Mirbabayi, (2021), arXiv:2103.03896 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  19. [60]C. V. Johnson, (2021), arXiv:2106.09048 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  20. [61]J. Wishart, Biometrika 20A , 32 (1928). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2331939
  21. [62]B. V. Bronk, Journal of Mathematical Physics 6 , 228 (1965), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1704274. · DOI
  22. [64]K. Okuyama, JHEP 12 , 080 (2020), arXiv:2009.02840 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  23. [65]A. Perret and G. Schehr, Journal of Statistical Physics 156 , 843?876 (2014).
  24. [66]P. J. Forrester and N. S. Witte, Kyushu Journal of Mathematics 61 , 457 (2007).
  25. [68]A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rev. B55 , 1142 (1997), arXiv:cond-mat/9602137 [cond-mat]. · arXiv
  26. [70]C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Commun. Math. Phys. 161 , 289 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9304063 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  27. [71]C. V. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 101 , 106023 (2020), arXiv:1912.03637 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  28. [72]C. V. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 103 , 046013 (2021), arXiv:2006.10959 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  29. [74]J. E. Carlisle, C. V. Johnson, and J. S. Pennington, J. Phys. A40 , 12451 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0501006 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  30. [75]J. E. Carlisle, C. V. Johnson, and J. S. Pennington, J. Phys. A41 , 085401 (2008), arXiv:hep-th/0511002 [hepth]. · arXiv
  31. [79]A. M. Ostrowski, Proc. Nat. Ac. Sc., Washington 35 , 612 (1949).
  32. [81]J. W. L. Glaisher, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 48 , 53 (1874). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786447408641072 · DOI
  33. [82]J. O'Kinealy, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 48 , 295 (1874).
  34. [84]T. Amdeberhan, O. Espinosa, I. Gonzalez, M. Harrison, V. H. Moll, and A. Straub, The Ramanujan Journal 29 , 103 (2012).
  35. [88]P. H. Ginsparg and G. W. Moore, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles (1993) pp. 277-469, arXiv:hepth/9304011.
  36. [89]K. Okuyama, JHEP 10 , 037 (2018), arXiv:1808.10161 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  37. [90]K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, JHEP 01 , 156 (2020), arXiv:1911.01659 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  38. [91]E. T. Bell, Annals of Mathematics 29 , 38 (1927). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1967979
  39. [92]P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis, and D. K. Kolchmeyer, (2021), arXiv:2104.01184 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  40. [93]C. V. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 103 , 046012 (2021), arXiv:2005.01893 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  41. [94]L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci, (2020), arXiv:2003.02860 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  42. [95]M. Heydeman, L. V. Iliesiu, G. J. Turiaci, and W. Zhao, (2020), arXiv:2011.01953 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  43. [96]S. D. Mathur, Fortsch. Phys. 53 , 793 (2005), arXiv:hepth/0502050.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, C. V.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Clifford V.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3149647163
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Random Matrices and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
quenched free energy, JT gravity, supergravity, matrix models, wormholes, black hole microstates, low-temperature limit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review