The DOI matches its DataCite record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Open accessAbstract
In this work, we explore "prompt tuning", a simple yet effective mechanism for learning "soft prompts" to condition frozen language models to perform specific downstream tasks. Unlike the discrete text prompts used by GPT-3, soft prompts are learned through backpropagation and can be tuned to incorporate signal from any number of labeled examples. Our end-to-end learned approach outperforms GPT-3's "few-shot" learning by a large margin. More remarkably, through ablations on model size using T5, we show that prompt tuning becomes more competitive with scale: as models exceed billions of parameters, our method "closes the gap" and matches the strong performance of model tuning (where all model weights are tuned). This finding is especially relevant in that large models are costly to share and serve, and the ability to reuse one frozen model for multiple downstream tasks can ease this burden. Our method can be seen as a simplification of the recently proposed "prefix tuning" of Li and Liang (2021), and we provide a comparison to this and other similar approaches. Finally, we show that conditioning a frozen model with soft prompts confers benefits in robustness to domain transfer, as compared to full model tuning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These approaches become inapplicable when there is only API access to the LLM.”
From Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023) · cites this paper as Lester et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893
Lewis, M., Liu, Y., Goyal, N., Ghazvininejad, M., Mohamed, A., Levy, O., Stoyanov, V., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.703 · Cited by 8,821
seaborn: statistical data visualization
Waskom, M. (2021) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.03021 · Cited by 7,310
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
Kudo, T., & Richardson, J. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-2012 · Cited by 4,454
Hansen, L. K., & Salamon, P. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.58871 · Cited by 4,260
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert- Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 1877-1901.
- Marie-Catherine De Marneff, Mandy Simons, and Ju- dith Tonhauser. 2019. The CommitmentBank: In- vestigating projection in naturally occurring dis- course. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23.
- Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, Ido Dagan, and Bill Dolan. 2007. The third PASCAL recog- nizing textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL workshop on textual entailment and paraphrasing, pages 1-9. Association for Com- putational Linguistics.
- PMLR.
- Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Kather- ine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to- text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Re- search, 21(140):1-67.
- Melissa Roemmele, Cosmin Adrian Bejan, and An- drew S Gordon. 2011. Choice of plausible alterna- tives: An evaluation of commonsense causal reason- ing. In 2011 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
- Noam Shazeer and Mitchell Stern. 2018. Adafactor: Adaptive learning rates with sublinear memory cost. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 80 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 4596-4604.
- PMLR.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,009 of 1,009
Ma, C., & Wolfinger, R. D. (2024) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00134 · Cited by 10
LLM4EduKG: LLM for Automatic Construction of Educational Knowledge Graph
Sun, J., Zhang, Z., & He, X. (2024) · International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA) · doi:10.1109/nana63151.2024.00051 · Cited by 12
Liu, J., Zhu, H., Wang, Z., Chen, N., Hou, T., Huang, B., Lu, W., Wang, Y., & Yang, S. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3471627 · Cited by 9
Unveiling the Lack of LVLM Robustness to Fundamental Visual Variations: Why and Path Forward
Fan, Z., Wang, Y., Polisetty, S., & Fung, Y. R. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1037 · Cited by 4
Cartridges: Lightweight and general-purpose long context representations via self-study
Eyuboglu, S., Ehrlich, R., Arora, S., Guha, N., Zinsley, D., Liu, E., Tennien, W., Rudra, A., Zou, J., Mirhoseini, A., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.06266
Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Models
Tsimpoukelli, M., Menick, J., Cabi, S., Eslami, S. M. A., Vinyals, O., & Hill, F. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.13884 · Cited by 355
A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment
Askell, A., Bai, Y., Chen, A., Drain, D., Ganguli, D., Henighan, T., Jones, A., Joseph, N., Mann, B., DasSarma, N., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.00861 · Cited by 146
Why Do Pretrained Language Models Help in Downstream Tasks? An Analysis of Head and Prompt Tuning
Wei, C., Xie, S. M., & Ma, T. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09226 · Cited by 32
Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models
Zou, A., Wang, Z., Carlini, N., Nasr, M., Kolter, J. Z., & Fredrikson, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.15043 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 3045-3059
- arXiv
- 2104.08691
- OpenAlex
- W3152956381
- Cited by
- 3,092
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 512 · 2025: 889 · 2024: 754 · 2023: 649 · 2022: 246 · 2021: 40
- FWCI
- 195.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- prompt tuning, soft prompts, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, frozen language models, few-shot learning, model size, prefix tuning, T5, large language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
