CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 17Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

A Framework for Ethical AI at the United Nations

Open access
Hogenhout, Lambert·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2104.12547arXiv 2104.12547
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper aims to provide an overview of the ethical concerns in artificial intelligence (AI) and the framework that is needed to mitigate those risks, and to suggest a practical path to ensure the development and use of AI at the United Nations (UN) aligns with our ethical values. The overview discusses how AI is an increasingly powerful tool with potential for good, albeit one with a high risk of negative side-effects that go against fundamental human rights and UN values. It explains the need for ethical principles for AI aligned with principles for data governance, as data and AI are tightly interwoven. It explores different ethical frameworks that exist and tools such as assessment lists. It recommends that the UN develop a framework consisting of ethical principles, architectural standards, assessment methods, tools and methodologies, and a policy to govern the implementation and adherence to this framework, accompanied by an education program for staff.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2104.12547

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Hogenhout, L.
Affiliations
United Nations (US)
Corresponding author
Hogenhout, Lambert
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2104.12547
arXiv
2104.12547
OpenAlex
W3158769183
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Keywords
ethical AI, AI ethics, United Nations, AI governance, ethical principles, data governance, human rights, AI risk mitigation, AI policy, employee training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review