TRECVID 2020: A comprehensive campaign for evaluating video retrieval tasks across multiple application domains
Open accessAbstract
The TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation (TRECVID) is a TREC-style video analysis and retrieval evaluation with the goal of promoting progress in research and development of content-based exploitation and retrieval of information from digital video via open, metrics-based evaluation. Over the last twenty years this effort has yielded a better understanding of how systems can effectively accomplish such processing and how one can reliably benchmark their performance. TRECVID has been funded by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) and other US government agencies. In addition, many organizations and individuals worldwide contribute significant time and effort. TRECVID 2020 represented a continuation of four tasks and the addition of two new tasks. In total, 29 teams from various research organizations worldwide completed one or more of the following six tasks: 1. Ad-hoc Video Search (AVS), 2. Instance Search (INS), 3. Disaster Scene Description and Indexing (DSDI), 4. Video to Text Description (VTT), 5. Activities in Extended Video (ActEV), 6. Video Summarization (VSUM). This paper is an introduction to the evaluation framework, tasks, data, and measures used in the evaluation campaign.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MovieChat: From Dense Token to Sparse Memory for Long Video Understanding
Song, E., Chai, W., Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhou, H., Wu, F., Chi, H., Guo, X., Ye, T., Zhang, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.16449 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
MovieChat: From Dense Token to Sparse Memory for Long Video Understanding
Song, E., Chai, W., Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhou, H., Wu, F., Chi, H., Guo, X., Ye, T., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01725 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Perceptual Robust Hashing for Video Copy Detection with Unsupervised Learning
Zhao, G., Qin, C., Luo, X., Zhang, X., & Chang, C.-C. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security · doi:10.1145/3577163.3595110 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“To demonstrate the generalization ability, we randomly selected videos from Kinectics [21] and TRECVID [22] as training data and testing data.”
Method
- Authors
- Awad, G., Butt, A. A., Curtis, K., Fiscus, J., Godil, A., Lee, Y., Delgado, A., Zhang, J., Godard, E., Chocot, B., Diduch, L., Liu, J., Smeaton, A. F., Graham, Y., Jones, G. J. F., Kraaij, W., & Quenot, G.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2104.13473
- OpenAlex
- W3158782016
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- video retrieval, video content analysis, benchmarking, instance search, video summarization, evaluation metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
