PreprintCited by 88Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisDigital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

A Good Image Generator Is What You Need for High-Resolution Video Synthesis

Open access
Tian, Yu, Ren, Jian, Chai, Menglei, Olszewski, Kyle, Peng, Xi, Metaxas, Dimitris N., Tulyakov, Sergey·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Image and video synthesis are closely related areas aiming at generating content from noise. While rapid progress has been demonstrated in improving image-based models to handle large resolutions, high-quality renderings, and wide variations in image content, achieving comparable video generation results remains problematic. We present a framework that leverages contemporary image generators to render high-resolution videos. We frame the video synthesis problem as discovering a trajectory in the latent space of a pre-trained and fixed image generator. Not only does such a framework render high-resolution videos, but it also is an order of magnitude more computationally efficient. We introduce a motion generator that discovers the desired trajectory, in which content and motion are disentangled. With such a representation, our framework allows for a broad range of applications, including content and motion manipulation. Furthermore, we introduce a new task, which we call cross-domain video synthesis, in which the image and motion generators are trained on disjoint datasets belonging to different domains. This allows for generating moving objects for which the desired video data is not available. Extensive experiments on various datasets demonstrate the advantages of our methods over existing video generation techniques. Code will be released at https://github.com/snap-research/MoCoGAN-HD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2104.15069

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MoCoGAN-HD outperformed previous approaches on unconditional generation in the UCF-101, Tai-Chi-HD, and Sky Time-lapse benchmarks.

    “It outperformed previous approaches on unconditional generation in the UCF-101, Tai-Chi-HD, and Sky Time-lapse benchmarks.”

    From Video Diffusion Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Tian et al., 2021

    Section 4.1 (pp. 5–7) reports that MoCoGAN-HD outperformed compared methods on UCF-101 and Sky Time-lapse in unconditional video generation. But its stated unconditional-generation benchmarks are UCF-101, FaceForensics, and Sky Time-lapse—not Tai-Chi-HD—so the Tai-Chi-HD part is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 88

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Rameen Abdal, Yipeng Qin, and Peter Wonka. Image2stylegan++: How to edit the embedded images? In CVPR , 2020.
  2. Dinesh Acharya, Zhiwu Huang, Danda Pani Paudel, and Luc Van Gool. Towards high resolution video generation with progressive growing of sliced wasserstein gans. arXiv:1810.02419 , 2018. · arXiv
  3. Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Chelsea Finn, Dumitru Erhan, Roy H Campbell, and Sergey Levine. Stochastic variational video prediction. In ICLR , 2017.
  4. Aayush Bansal, Shugao Ma, Deva Ramanan, and Yaser Sheikh. Recycle-gan: Unsupervised video retargeting. In ECCV , 2018.
  5. Wonmin Byeon, Qin Wang, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, and Petros Koumoutsakos. Contextvp: Fully context-aware video prediction. In ECCV , 2018.
  6. Caroline Chan, Shiry Ginosar, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. Everybody dance now. In ICCV , 2019.
  7. Ting Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, and Geoffrey Hinton. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In ICML , 2020a.
  8. Ting Chen, Simon Kornblith, Kevin Swersky, Mohammad Norouzi, and Geoffrey Hinton. Big selfsupervised models are strong semi-supervised learners. arXiv:2006.10029 , 2020b. · arXiv
  9. Yunjey Choi, Youngjung Uh, Jaejun Yoo, and Jung-Woo Ha. Stargan v2: Diverse image synthesis for multiple domains. In CVPR , 2020.
  10. Aidan Clark, Jeff Donahue, and Karen Simonyan. Adversarial video generation on complex datasets. arXiv , 2019.
  11. Emily Denton and Rob Fergus. Stochastic video generation with a learned prior. In ICML , 2018.
  12. Emily L Denton et al. Unsupervised learning of disentangled representations from video. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 4414-4423, 2017.
  13. Terrance DeVries and Graham W Taylor. Improved regularization of convolutional neural networks with cutout. arXiv:1708.04552 , 2017. · arXiv
  14. Jeff Donahue and Karen Simonyan. Large scale adversarial representation learning. In NeurIPS , 2019.
  15. Frederik Ebert, Chelsea Finn, Alex X Lee, and Sergey Levine. Self-supervised visual planning with temporal skip connections. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.05268 , 2017. · arXiv
  16. Lore Goetschalckx, Alex Andonian, Aude Oliva, and Phillip Isola. Ganalyze: Toward visual definitions of cognitive image properties. In ICCV , 2019.
  17. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In NeurIPS , 2014.
  18. Michael Gutmann and Aapo Hyv¨ arinen. Noise-contrastive estimation: A new estimation principle for unnormalized statistical models. In AISTATS , 2010.
  19. Raia Hadsell, Sumit Chopra, and Yann LeCun. Dimensionality reduction by learning an invariant mapping. In CVPR , 2006.
  20. Erik H¨ ark¨ onen, Aaron Hertzmann, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Sylvain Paris. Ganspace: Discovering interpretable gan controls. arXiv:2004.02546 , 2020. · arXiv
  21. Kaiming He, Haoqi Fan, Yuxin Wu, Saining Xie, and Ross Girshick. Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning. In CVPR , 2020.
  22. Olivier J H´ enaff, Aravind Srinivas, Jeffrey De Fauw, Ali Razavi, Carl Doersch, SM Eslami, and Aaron van den Oord. Data-efficient image recognition with contrastive predictive coding. In ICML , 2020.
  23. R Devon Hjelm, Alex Fedorov, Samuel Lavoie-Marchildon, Karan Grewal, Phil Bachman, Adam Trischler, and Yoshua Bengio. Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximization. In ICLR , 2019.
  24. Jun-Ting Hsieh, Bingbin Liu, De-An Huang, Li F Fei-Fei, and Juan Carlos Niebles. Learning to decompose and disentangle representations for video prediction. In NeurIPS , 2018.
  25. Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In CVPR , 2017.
  26. Ali Jahanian, Lucy Chai, and Phillip Isola. On the'steerability' of generative adversarial networks. In ICLR , 2020.
  27. Qing Jin, Jian Ren, Oliver J. Woodford, Jiazhuo Wang, Geng Yuan Yuan, Yanzhi Wang, and Sergey Tulyakov. Teachers do more than teach: Compressing image-to-image models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03467 , 2021. · arXiv
  28. Justin Johnson, Alexandre Alahi, and Li Fei-Fei. Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In ECCV , 2016.
  29. Tero Karras, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine, and Jaakko Lehtinen. Progressive growing of gans for improved quality, stability, and variation. arXiv:1710.10196 , 2017. · arXiv
  30. Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Samuli Laine, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila. Training generative adversarial networks with limited data. arXiv:2006.06676 , 2020a. · arXiv
  31. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila. Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. In CVPR , 2020b.
  32. Sindy L¨ owe, Peter O'Connor, and Bastiaan Veeling. Putting an end to end-to-end: Gradient-isolated learning of representations. In NeurIPS , 2019.
  33. Ishan Misra and Laurens van der Maaten. Self-supervised learning of pretext-invariant representations. In CVPR , 2020.
  34. Taesung Park, Alexei A. Efros, Richard Zhang, and Jun-Yan Zhu. Contrastive learning for unpaired image-to-image translation. In ECCV , 2020.
  35. Antoine Plumerault, Herv´ e Le Borgne, and C´ eline Hudelot. Controlling generative models with continuous factors of variations. In ICLR , 2020.
  36. Alec Radford, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. In ICLR , 2016.
  37. Jian Ren, Menglei Chai, Sergey Tulyakov, Chen Fang, Xiaohui Shen, and Jianchao Yang. Human motion transfer from poses in the wild. arXiv:2004.03142 , 2020. · arXiv
  38. Andreas R¨ ossler, Davide Cozzolino, Luisa Verdoliva, Christian Riess, Justus Thies, and Matthias Nießner. Faceforensics: A large-scale video dataset for forgery detection in human faces. arXiv:1803.09179 , 2018. · arXiv
  39. Masaki Saito, Eiichi Matsumoto, and Shunta Saito. Temporal generative adversarial nets with singular value clipping. In ICCV , 2017.
  40. Masaki Saito, Shunta Saito, Masanori Koyama, and Sosuke Kobayashi. Train sparsely, generate densely: Memory-efficient unsupervised training of high-resolution temporal gan. IJCV , 2020.
  41. Yujun Shen and Bolei Zhou. Closed-form factorization of latent semantics in gans. arXiv:2007.06600 , 2020. · arXiv
  42. Yujun Shen, Jinjin Gu, Xiaoou Tang, and Bolei Zhou. Interpreting the latent space of gans for semantic face editing. In CVPR , 2020.
  43. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv:1409.1556 , 2014. · arXiv
  44. Khurram Soomro, Amir Roshan Zamir, and Mubarak Shah. Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild. arXiv:1212.0402 , 2012. · arXiv
  45. Sergey Tulyakov, Ming-Yu Liu, Xiaodong Yang, and Jan Kautz. Mocogan: Decomposing motion and content for video generation. In CVPR , 2018.
  46. Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Raphael Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. Towards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges. arXiv:1812.01717 , 2018. · arXiv
  47. Ruben Villegas, Jimei Yang, Yuliang Zou, Sungryull Sohn, Xunyu Lin, and Honglak Lee. Learning to generate long-term future via hierarchical prediction. In ICML , 2017b.
  48. Carl Vondrick, Hamed Pirsiavash, and Antonio Torralba. Generating videos with scene dynamics. In NeurIPS , 2016.
  49. Andrey Voynov and Artem Babenko. Unsupervised discovery of interpretable directions in the gan latent space. In ICML , 2020.
  50. Jacob Walker, Kenneth Marino, Abhinav Gupta, and Martial Hebert. The pose knows: Video forecasting by generating pose futures. In ICCV , 2017.
  51. Ting-Chun Wang, Ming-Yu Liu, Jun-Yan Zhu, Guilin Liu, Andrew Tao, Jan Kautz, and Bryan Catanzaro. Video-to-video synthesis. In NeurIPS , 2018a.
  52. Ting-Chun Wang, Ming-Yu Liu, Jun-Yan Zhu, Andrew Tao, Jan Kautz, and Bryan Catanzaro. Highresolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional gans. In CVPR , 2018b.
  53. Ting-Chun Wang, Ming-Yu Liu, Andrew Tao, Guilin Liu, Jan Kautz, and Bryan Catanzaro. Fewshot video-to-video synthesis. In NeurIPS , 2019.
  54. Dirk Weissenborn, Oscar T¨ ackstr¨ om, and Jakob Uszkoreit. Scaling autoregressive video models. In ICLR , 2020.
  55. Zhirong Wu, Yuanjun Xiong, X Yu Stella, and Dahua Lin. Unsupervised feature learning via nonparametric instance discrimination. In CVPR , 2018.
  56. Wei Xiong, Wenhan Luo, Lin Ma, Wei Liu, and Jiebo Luo. Learning to generate time-lapse videos using multi-stage dynamic generative adversarial networks. In CVPR , 2018.
  57. Zili Yi, Hao Zhang, Ping Tan, and Minglun Gong. Dualgan: Unsupervised dual learning for imageto-image translation. In ICCV , 2017.
  58. Fisher Yu, Ari Seff, Yinda Zhang, Shuran Song, Thomas Funkhouser, and Jianxiong Xiao. Lsun: Construction of a large-scale image dataset using deep learning with humans in the loop. arXiv:1506.03365 , 2015. · arXiv
  59. Vladyslav Yushchenko, Nikita Araslanov, and Stefan Roth. Markov decision process for video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops , pp. 0-0, 2019.
  60. Jiangning Zhang, Chao Xu, Liang Liu, Mengmeng Wang, Xia Wu, Yong Liu, and Yunliang Jiang. Dtvnet: Dynamic time-lapse video generation via single still image. In ECCV , 2020.
  61. Long Zhao, Xi Peng, Yu Tian, Mubbasir Kapadia, and Dimitris Metaxas. Learning to forecast and refine residual motion for image-to-video generation. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) , pp. 387-403, 2018.
  62. Shengyu Zhao, Zhijian Liu, Ji Lin, Jun-Yan Zhu, and Song Han. Differentiable augmentation for data-efficient gan training. arXiv:2006.10738 , 2020a. · arXiv
  63. Zhengli Zhao, Zizhao Zhang, Ting Chen, Sameer Singh, and Han Zhang. Image augmentations for gan training. arXiv:2006.02595 , 2020b. · arXiv
  64. Jiapeng Zhu, Yujun Shen, Deli Zhao, and Bolei Zhou. In-domain gan inversion for real image editing. In ECCV , 2020.
  65. Jun-Yan Zhu, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A Efros. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In ICCV , 2017.

Authors
Tian, Y., Ren, J., Chai, M., Olszewski, K., Peng, X., Metaxas, D. N., & Tulyakov, S.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Snap (United States) (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3118816476
Cited by
88
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
image generators, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review