The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Federated Face Recognition
Open accessAbstract
Face recognition has been extensively studied in computer vision and artificial intelligence communities in recent years. An important issue of face recognition is data privacy, which receives more and more public concerns. As a common privacy-preserving technique, Federated Learning is proposed to train a model cooperatively without sharing data between parties. However, as far as we know, it has not been successfully applied in face recognition. This paper proposes a framework named FedFace to innovate federated learning for face recognition. Specifically, FedFace relies on two major innovative algorithms, Partially Federated Momentum (PFM) and Federated Validation (FV). PFM locally applies an estimated equivalent global momentum to approximating the centralized momentum-SGD efficiently. FV repeatedly searches for better federated aggregating weightings via testing the aggregated models on some private validation datasets, which can improve the model's generalization ability. The ablation study and extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of the FedFace method and show that it is comparable to or even better than the centralized baseline in performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Commitment to privacy protection is regarded as an important factor determining the trustworthiness of an AI system.”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The recently released AI ethics guidelines also highlight privacy as one of the key concerns [178, 9].”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Privacy-preserving techniques like federated learning provide a solution to extract knowledge from distributed user data while preserving the identification-sensitive information [4, 9].”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?
Woodworth, B., Patel, K. K., Stich, S. U., Dai, Z., Bullins, B., McMahan, H. B., Shamir, O., & Srebro, N. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.07839 · Cited by 131
Mime: Mimicking Centralized Stochastic Algorithms in Federated Learning
Karimireddy, S. P., Jaggi, M., Kale, S., Mohri, M., Reddi, S. J., Stich, S. U., & Suresh, A. T. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.03606 · Cited by 96
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Qiong Cao, Li Shen, Weidi Xie, Omkar M Parkhi, and Andrew Zisserman. Vggface2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and age. In FG, pages 67- 74. IEEE, 2018.
- Yang Chen, Xiaoyan Sun, and Yaochu Jin. Communication-efficient federated deep learning with layerwise asynchronous model update and temporally weighted aggregation. IEEE TNNLS, 2019.
- Deng et al., 2019] Jiankang Deng, Jia Guo, Niannan Xue, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Arcface: Additive angular mar- gin loss for deep face recognition. In CVPR, pages 4690- 4699, 2019.
- Yandong Guo, Lei Zhang, Yuxiao Hu, Xi- aodong He, and Jianfeng Gao. Ms-celeb-1m: A dataset and benchmark for large-scale face recognition. In ECCV, pages 87-102, 2016.
- Karimireddy et al., 2020b] Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Satyen Kale, Mehryar Mohri, Sashank Reddi, Sebastian Stich, and Ananda Theertha Suresh. SCAFFOLD: Stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning. In ICML, volume 119 of PMLR, pages 5132-5143, 2020.
- Ira Kemelmacher- Shlizerman, Steven M Seitz, Daniel Miller, and Evan Brossard. The megaface benchmark: 1 million faces for recognition at scale. In CVPR, 2016.
- Ahmed Khaled, Konstantin Mishchenko, and Peter Richtárik. Tighter theory for local sgd on identical and heterogeneous data. In ICAIS, pages 4519-4529.
- PMLR, 2020.
- Anastasia Koloskova, Nicolas Loizou, Sadra Boreiri, Martin Jaggi, and Sebastian U. Stich. A unified theory of decentralized SGD with changing topology and local updates. In ICML, 2020.
- Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Ar- cas. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1273-1282. PMLR, 2017.
- Stylianos Moschoglou, Athana- sios Papaioannou, Christos Sagonas, Jiankang Deng, Irene Kotsia, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Agedb: the first manually collected, in-the-wild age database. In CVPR Workshops, 2017.
- S. Sengupta, J.-C. Chen, C. Castillo, V. M. Patel, R. Chellappa, and D.W. Jacobs. Frontal to profile face verification in the wild. In WACV, 2016.
- Sebastian U. Stich. Local SGD converges fast and communicates little. In ICLR, 2019.
- Hao Wang, Yitong Wang, Zheng Zhou, Xing Ji, Dihong Gong, Jingchao Zhou, Zhifeng Li, and Wei Liu. Cosface: Large margin cosine loss for deep face recognition. In CVPR, pages 5265-5274, 2018.
- Jianyu Wang, Vinayak Tantia, Nicolas Ballas, and Michael G. Rabbat. Slowmo: Improving communication-efficient distributed SGD with slow mo- mentum. In ICLR, 2020.
- Cameron Whitelam, Emma Taborsky, Austin Blanton, Brianna Maze, Jocelyn Adams, Tim Miller, Nathan Kalka, Anil K Jain, James A Duncan, Kristen Allen, et al. Iarpa janus benchmark-b face dataset. In CVPR Workshops, 2017.
- Wu and Wang, 2020] Hongda Wu and Ping Wang. Fast- convergent federated learning with adaptive weighting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00661, 2020. · arXiv
- Hao Yu, Sen Yang, and Shenghuo Zhu. Par- allel restarted sgd with faster convergence and less com- munication: Demystifying why model averaging works for deep learning. In AAAI, 2019.
- Yue Zhao, Meng Li, Liangzhen Lai, Naveen Suda, Damon Civin, and Vikas Chandra. Fed- erated learning with non-iid data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00582, 2018. · arXiv
- Zheng et al., 2017] Tianyue Zheng, Weihong Deng, and Jiani Hu. Cross-age lfw: A database for studying cross-age face recognition in unconstrained environments. arXiv:1708.08197, 2017. · arXiv
- Wenbo Zheng, Lan Yan, Chao Gou, and Fei-Yue Wang. Federated meta-learning for fraudulent credit card detection. In IJCAI, 2020.
- Weiming Zhuang, Yonggang Wen, Xuesen Zhang, Xin Gan, Daiying Yin, Dongzhan Zhou, Shuai Zhang, and Shuai Yi. Performance optimization of federated person re-identification via benchmark analysis. In ACM MM, pages 955-963, 2020.
Cited by
Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices
Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555803 · Cited by 612
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, F., Wu, J., Shen, P., Li, S., & Zhou, S.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- Tencent (China) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2105.02501
- OpenAlex
- W3159333625
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Keywords
- federated learning, data privacy, momentum SGD, model aggregation, generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Federated Face Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2105.02501
- The paper
- Bai, F., Wu, J., Shen, P., Li, S., & Zhou, S. (2021). Federated Face Recognition. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2105.02501
