SpeechNet: A Universal Modularized Model for Speech Processing Tasks
Open accessAbstract
There is a wide variety of speech processing tasks ranging from extracting content information from speech signals to generating speech signals. For different tasks, model networks are usually designed and tuned separately. If a universal model can perform multiple speech processing tasks, some tasks might be improved with the related abilities learned from other tasks. The multi-task learning of a wide variety of speech processing tasks with a universal model has not been studied. This paper proposes a universal modularized model, SpeechNet, which treats all speech processing tasks into a speech/text input and speech/text output format. We select five essential speech processing tasks for multi-task learning experiments with SpeechNet. We show that SpeechNet learns all of the above tasks, and we further analyze which tasks can be improved by other tasks. SpeechNet is modularized and flexible for incorporating more modules, tasks, or training approaches in the future. We release the code and experimental settings to facilitate the research of modularized universal models and multi-task learning of speech processing tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing representative audio-language multi-task models (SpeechNet, SpeechT5, VIOLA, Whisper, and Pengi) are limited to processing specific audio types, such as human speech or natural sounds.
“Existing representative audio-language multi-tasks language models, such as SpeechNet (Chen et al., 2021), SpeechT5 (Ao et al., 2021), VIOLA (Wang et al., 2023d), Whisper (Radford et al., 2023) and Pengi (Deshmukh et al., 2023) are limited to processing specific audio types, such as human speech or natural sounds.”
From Qwen-Audio: Advancing Universal Audio Understanding via Unified Large-Scale Audio-Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2021
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929 · see citing works
VoxCeleb: A Large-Scale Speaker Identification Dataset
Nagrani, A., Chung, J. S., & Zisserman, A. (2017) · Interspeech 2017 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-950 · Cited by 2,210 · see citing works
Neural Speech Synthesis with Transformer Network
Li, N., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Zhao, S., & Liu, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016706 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
Deep voice 3: scaling text-to-speech with convolutional sequence learning
Ping, W., Peng, K., Gibiansky, A., Arik, S. O., Kannan, A., Narang, S., Raiman, J., & Miller, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.07654 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qwen-Audio: Advancing Universal Audio Understanding via Unified Large-Scale Audio-Language Models
Chu, Y., Xu, J., Zhou, X., Yang, Q., Zhang, S., Yan, Z., Zhou, C., & Zhou, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.07919 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“Existing representative audio-language multi-tasks language models, such as SpeechNet (Chen et al., 2021), SpeechT5 (Ao et al., 2021), VIOLA (Wang et al., 2023d), Whisper (Radford et al., 2023) and Pengi (Deshmukh et al., 2023) are limited to processing specific audio types, such as human speech or natural sounds.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChu, Y., Xu, J., Yang, Q., Wei, H., Wei, X., Guo, Z., Leng, Y., Lv, Y., He, J., Lin, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.10759 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…Qwen2-Audio Figure 1: Performance of Qwen2-Audio, Qwen-Audio and previous top-tiers from LALMs such as SpeechT5 (Ao et al., 2021), SpeechNet (Chen et al., 2021), SpeechLLaMA (Wu et al., 2023a), SALMONN (Tang et al., 2024), Whisper (Radford et al., 2023) Pengi (Deshmukh et al., 2023), and…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-C., Chi, P.-H., Yang, S.-W., Chang, K.-W., Lin, J.-H., Huang, S.-F., Liu, D.-R., Liu, C.-L., Lee, C.-K., & Lee, H.-Y.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Nvidia (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2105.03070
- OpenAlex
- W3161940574
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- multi-task learning, speech recognition, speech synthesis, speech-to-text, text-to-speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review