The DOI matches its DataCite record; 49 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classification
Open accessAbstract
Fine-tuned pre-trained language models (PLMs) have achieved awesome performance on almost all NLP tasks. By using additional prompts to fine-tune PLMs, we can further stimulate the rich knowledge distributed in PLMs to better serve downstream tasks. Prompt tuning has achieved promising results on some few-class classification tasks such as sentiment classification and natural language inference. However, manually designing lots of language prompts is cumbersome and fallible. For those auto-generated prompts, it is also expensive and time-consuming to verify their effectiveness in non-few-shot scenarios. Hence, it is still challenging for prompt tuning to address many-class classification tasks. To this end, we propose prompt tuning with rules (PTR) for many-class text classification and apply logic rules to construct prompts with several sub-prompts. In this way, PTR is able to encode prior knowledge of each class into prompt tuning. We conduct experiments on relation classification, a typical and complicated many-class classification task, and the results show that PTR can significantly and consistently outperform existing state-of-the-art baselines. This indicates that PTR is a promising approach to take advantage of both human prior knowledge and PLMs for those complicated classification tasks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Han et al. [41] propose prompt tuning with rules (PTR), which uses manually crafted sub-templates to compose a complete template using logic rules.”
From Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“To enhance the representation ability of the resulting template, they also insert several virtual tokens whose embeddings can be tuned together with the pre-trained LMs parameters using training samples.”
From Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“Experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of this prompt design method in relation classification tasks.”
From Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325 · cited 1×
“…al., 2020), summarization (Zhang et al., 2019; Liu and Lapata, 2019), question answering (Adiwardana et al., 2020), to text classification (Baldini Soares et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2020; Ding et al., 2021), fine-tuned PLMs have been demonstrated their effectiveness on almost all important NLP tasks.”
BackgroundPan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · cited 2×
“To alleviate this issue, prompt tuning has been proposed to bridge the gap of objective forms in pre-training and fine-tuning (Brown et al., 2020; Schick et al., 2020).”
BackgroundRoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515 · cited 4×
“, 2019), RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019) and T5 (Raffel et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialExploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929
Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553380 · Cited by 5,366
The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243 · Cited by 3,096 · cited 1×
“Recently, some continuous prompts have also been proposed (Li and Liang, 2021; Lester et al., 2021), which directly use a series of learnable continuous embeddings as prompt templates and get rid of the trouble of designing prompts.”
BackgroundPrefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation
Li, X. L., & Liang, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.353 · Cited by 2,473 · cited 1×
“Recently, some continuous prompts have also been proposed (Li and Liang, 2021; Lester et al., 2021), which directly use a series of learnable continuous embeddings as prompt templates and get rid of the trouble of designing prompts.”
BackgroundExploiting Cloze-Questions for Few-Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inference
Schick, T., & Schütze, H. (2020) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.07676 · Cited by 1,935 · cited 2×
“tasks such as natural language inference (Schick and Schütze, 2021; Liu et al., 2021).”
BackgroundText Summarization with Pretrained Encoders
Liu, Y., & Lapata, M. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1387 · Cited by 1,934 · cited 1×
“, 2020), summarization (Zhang et al., 2019; Liu and Lapata, 2019), question answering (Adiwardana et al.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 576
Large Knowledge Model: Perspectives and Challenges
Chen, H. (2024) · Data Intelligence · doi:10.3724/2096-7004.di.2024.0001 · Cited by 56
“The evolution of prompts ranges from mere textual prompt, CoT prompt with more logic descriptions to more structured prompts such as Program of Thoughts [21], Tree of Thoughts [34], and Graph of Thoughts [35], and even directly using logical rules as prompts [36].”
BackgroundInstruct Me More! Random Prompting for Visual In-Context Learning
Zhang, J., Wang, B., Li, L., Nakashima, Y., & Nagahara, H. (2024) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv57701.2024.00258 · Cited by 20
Visual-Language Navigation Pretraining via Prompt-based Environmental Self-exploration
Liang, X.-W., Zhu, F., Li, L.-L., Xu, H., & Liang, X.-D. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.04006 · Cited by 42
“Ptr (Han et al., 2021) adopts manually crafted sub-templates and generates complete templates by logic rules.”
MethodIs Prompt All You Need? No. A Comprehensive and Broader View of Instruction LearningPreprint
Lou, R., Zhang, K., & Yin, W. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10475 · Cited by 42
Enhancing Cross-lingual Natural Language Inference by Prompt-learning from Cross-lingual Templates
Qi, K., Wan, H., Du, J., & Chen, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.134 · Cited by 30
“Several approaches (Li and Liang, 2021; Liu et al., 2021; Han et al., 2021) have been proposed to search continuous prompts.”
BackgroundWang, P., Zeng, X., Chen, L., Ye, F., Mao, Y., Zhu, J., & Gao, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3565816.3565836 · Cited by 40
Generative Prompt Tuning for Relation Classification
Han, J., Zhao, S., Cheng, B., Ma, S., & Lu, W. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.12435 · Cited by 40
“TANL, NLI, PTR, and Know-Prompt exploit label semantics.”
InfluentialTowards Unified Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Text Classification
Wang, J., Wang, C.-Y., Luo, F., Tan, C.-Q., Qiu, M., Yang, F., Shi, Q., Huang, S.-F., & Gao, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.05313 · Cited by 40
“Other works (Shin et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021b; Scao and Rush, 2021; Utama et al., 2021) mine prompts from the training corpus based on heuristic rules/semantic relations.”
BackgroundExploring Low-dimensional Intrinsic Task Subspace via Prompt Tuning
Qin, Y., Wang, X., Su, Y., Lin, Y.-K., Ding, N., Liu, Z.-Y., Li, J.-Z., Hou, L., Li, P., Sun, M., et al. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07867 · Cited by 40
“…tasks and adding some prompt tokens into the input, including human-designed explainable prompts (Brown et al., 2020; Schick and Schütze, 2021a,b; Han et al., 2021b; Ding et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2021) and automatically searched prompts (Jiang et al., 2020; Shin et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2021).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPrompt Tuning in Biomedical Relation Extraction
He, J., Li, F., Li, J., Hu, X., Nian, Y., Xiang, Y., Wang, J., Wei, Q., Li, Y., Xu, H., et al. (2024) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-024-00162-9 · Cited by 36
“Research has shown that prompt tuning can perform well in various NLP tasks [8–11] and their few-shot scenarios [12, 13].”
Knowledge-based dynamic prompt learning for multi-label disease diagnosis
Xie, J., Li, X., Yuan, Y., Guan, Y., Jiang, J., Guo, X., & Peng, X. X. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111395 · Cited by 39
Shi, S., Hu, K., Xie, J., Guo, Y., & Wu, H. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103531 · Cited by 44
Unified Semantic Typing with Meaningful Label Inference
Huang, J. Y., Li, B.-Z., Xu, J., & Chen, M. (2022) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.01826 · Cited by 38
“Following this idea, semantic typing tasks have been reformulated as prompt-based learning (Ding et al., 2021; Han et al., 2021), natural language inference (Yin et al., 2019; Sainz et al., 2021), question answering (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Du and Cardie, 2020), and translation (Paolini…”
MethodPersonalized Prompt for Sequential Recommendation
Wu, Y., Xie, R., Zhu, Y., Zhuang, F., Zhang, X., Lin, L., & He, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3357498 · Cited by 75
“Prompt-tuning [8],[9],[10]isarepresentativeandpowerful method that has remarkable superiority over the classical fine-tuning paradigm, especially in zero-shot and few-shot scenarios.”
MethodBetter Few-Shot Relation Extraction with Label Prompt Dropout
Zhang, P., & Lu, W. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13733 · Cited by 36
“Specifically, HCRP and MapRE also use textual label in their model, but their models lead to sub-optimal performance, proving the effectiveness of dropping out textual labels during training.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhy only Micro-F1? Class Weighting of Measures for Relation Classification
Harbecke, D., Chen, Y., Hennig, L., & Alt, C. (2022) · NLPPOWER · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.09460 · Cited by 36
“The scores from dodrans and entropy indicate that only if all classes are considered equally important the PTR model should be preferred.”
InfluentialA prompt model with combined semantic refinement for aspect sentiment analysis
Zhu, X., Kuang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103462 · Cited by 35
Automatic Construction Accident Report Analysis Using Large Language Models (LLMs)
Ahmadi, E., Muley, S., & Wang, C. (2025) · Journal of Intelligent Construction · doi:10.26599/jic.2024.9180039 · Cited by 35
LM-CPPF: Paraphrasing-Guided Data Augmentation for Contrastive Prompt-Based Few-Shot Fine-Tuning
Abaskohi, A., Rothe, S., & Yaghoobzadeh, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.59 · Cited by 30
“This approach has been shown to be effective in various NLP tasks, including text classification (Han et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022) and question answering (Yao et al., 2022).”
BackgroundTailor: A Prompt-Based Approach to Attribute-Based Controlled Text Generation
Yang, K., Liu, D., Lei, W., Yang, B., Xue, M., Chen, B.-X., & Xie, J. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.13362 · Cited by 34
“To achieve it, PTR (Han et al., 2021) introduces manual sub-prompts for entity recognition and relation classification, respectively.”
MethodInfluentialRetrieval And Structuring Augmented Generation with Large Language Models
Jiang, P., Ouyang, S., Jiao, Y., Zhong, M., Tian, R., & Han, J. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3711896.3736557 · Cited by 28
“With the rise of LLMs, prompting-based methods [71, 245, 260, 313] achieved notable results by leveraging LLMs’ internal knowledge.”
LLMEmbed: Rethinking Lightweight LLM's Genuine Function in Text Classification
Liu, C., Zhang, H., Zhao, K., Ju, X., & Yang, L. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.03725 · Cited by 33
Prompt-based Connective Prediction Method for Fine-grained Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition
Zhou, H., Lan, M., Wu, Y.-B., Chen, Y., & Ma, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.07032 · Cited by 33
“…NLP tasks, such as text classification (Schick and Schütze, 2021a; Hu et al., 2021), text matching (Jiang et al., 2022), named entity recognition (Cui et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021), and relation extraction (Han et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022a), particularly on few-shot and zero-shot settings.”
A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT
(2024) · Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs · doi:10.64346/plop2023p05 · Cited by 32
“Han et al. [31] researched strategies for designing prompts for classification tasks.”
BackgroundKnowledge Prompting in Pre-trained Language Model for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, J., Huang, W., Qiu, M., Shi, Q., Wang, H.-B., Li, X. L., & Gao, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.08536 · Cited by 32
“There are also recent works that improve prompt-tuning based on heuristic rules (Han et al., 2021), automatic prompt construction (Gao et al., 2021a; Shin et al., 2020) and continuous prompt learning (Liu et al., 2021b,a; Hu et al., 2021; Gu et al., 2021).”
BackgroundReduce Communication Costs and Preserve Privacy: Prompt Tuning Method in Federated Learning
Zhao, H., Du, W., Li, F., Li, P., & Liu, G.-S. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.12268 · Cited by 32
“Moreover, PTR (Han et al. 2021) applies logic rules to build templates that are more suitable for text classification tasks.”
A survey on pragmatic processing techniques
Mao, R., Ge, M., Han, S., Wei, L., He, K., Zhu, L., & Cambria, E. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102712 · Cited by 24
He, K., Mao, R., Huang, Y., Gong, T., Li, C., & Cambria, E. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3314807 · Cited by 32
“Most prompt-based methods first construct semantic templates as prompts to obtain masked word predictions from a pretrained language model (PLM), then map these predictions into task-specific labels [12], [13].”
CodePrompt: Task-Agnostic Prefix Tuning for Program and Language Generation
Choi, Y., & Lee, J.-H. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.325 · Cited by 20
“It makes the model difficult to fully utilize the knowledge of pre-trained models, resulting in suboptimal performance on downstream tasks (Lester et al., 2021; Gu et al., 2022; Han et al., 2022).”
MethodGrasping the Essentials: Tailoring Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Relation Extraction
Zhou, S., Meng, Y., Jin, B., & Han, J.-W. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.11142 · Cited by 30
“To address this data scarcity, few-and zero-shot RE works try to leverage knowledge from LM pre-training or auxiliary sources (Petroni et al., 2019; Chia et al., 2022; Han et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2022a; Zhao et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2023a; Wan et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023b; Sun et al., 2024).”
BackgroundHow Does In-Context Learning Help Prompt Tuning?
Sun, S., Liu, Y., Iter, D., Zhu, C., & Iyyer, M. (2023) · Findings · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.11521 · Cited by 30
Information Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios: Survey and Perspective
Deng, S., Ma, Y., Zhang, N., Cao, Y., & Hooi, B. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Graph (ICKG) · doi:10.1109/ickg63256.2024.00013 · Cited by 25
“For low-resource IE, instruction prompting can be effective as it allows the model to execute tasks using its pre-existing knowledge and language understanding.”
Yu, Y., Zhang, R., Xu, R., Zhang, J., Shen, J., & Zhang, C. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.141 · Cited by 30
“Lastly, as prompting methods have been widely adopted to other tasks such as natural language inference (Gao et al., 2021a) and relation extraction (Han et al., 2021), it is possible to extend our method to these tasks.”
MethodCan NLI Provide Proper Indirect Supervision for Low-resource Biomedical Relation Extraction?
Xu, J., Ma, M. D., & Chen, M. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.10784 · Cited by 29
“(2022), which leverage prompt tuning with rules (Han et al., 2022) to learn optimal discrete tokens to fill in [MASK] within the template such as “@CHEMICAL$ [MASK] [MASK] [MASK] @GENE$.”
BackgroundPrompt-Based Rule Discovery and Boosting for Interactive Weakly-Supervised Learning
Zhang, R., Yu, Y., Shetty, P., Song, L., & Zhang, C. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09735 · Cited by 29
“Prompt-ing has been explored in various tasks, including text classification (Hu et al., 2021; Han et al., 2021; Schick and Schütze, 2021a,b), information extraction (Lester et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021) and text generation (Dou et al., 2021; Li and Liang, 2021).”
Automated Construction of Theme-specific Knowledge GraphsPreprint
Ding, L., Zhou, S., Xiao, J.-F., & Han, J. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.19146 · Cited by 28
“Prompt-tuning-based approaches construct well-curated prompts to distill the hidden relational knowledge from large language models (LLMs) [7, 8, 20].”
BackgroundChang, K.-W., Tseng, W.-C., Li, S.-W. D., & Lee, H.-Y. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.16773 · Cited by 10
“In NLP, prompting on text classification tasks has also achieved remarkable results [13, 20, 22, 30].”
BackgroundDemystifying Embedding Spaces using Large Language ModelsPreprint
Tennenholtz, G., Chow, Y., Hsu, C., Jeong, J., Shani, L., Tulepbergenov, A., Ramachandran, D., Mladenov, M., & Boutilier, C. E. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.04475 · Cited by 22
“, 2021), which prepends a sequence of task-specific vectors to the input, while keeping LLM parameters frozen; and hard-soft prompt hybrid tuning (Liu et al., 2021; Han et al., 2022), which inserts tunable embeddings into a hard prompt template.”
BackgroundInverse is Better! Fast and Accurate Prompt for Few-shot Slot Tagging
Hou, Y.-T., Chen, C., Luo, X.-Z., Li, B., & Che, W. (2022) · Findings · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.00885 · Cited by 27
“Meanwhile, due to the continuity of parameters in neural networks, continuous prompts for both text classification and generation tasks (Li and Liang, 2021; Liu et al., 2021b; Han et al., 2021) have been proposed.”
BackgroundProRLearn: boosting prompt tuning-based vulnerability detection by reinforcement learning
Ren, Z., Ju, X., Chen, X., & Shen, H. (2024) · Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10515-024-00438-9 · Cited by 23
“This training imparts a certain level of code knowledge to CodeBERT, and further fine-tuning with downstream task (Schick and Schütze 2021; Li and Liang 2021; Lester et al. 2021; Gu et al. 2022; Han et al. 2022) corpora enhances its understanding of specific tasks.”
PSCVFinder: A Prompt-Tuning Based Framework for Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection
Yu, L., Lu, J., Liu, X., Li, Y., Zhang, F., & Ma, J. (2023) · Proceedings/Proceedings - International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering · doi:10.1109/issre59848.2023.00030 · Cited by 29
Liao, J., Zhao, X. H., Zheng, J., Li, X., Cai, F., & Tang, J. (2022) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3477495.3532048 · Cited by 20
“For relation extraction, PTR employs logic rules to enhance prompts with several sub-prompts [12].”
MethodChinese legal judgment prediction via knowledgeable prompt learning
Sun, J., Huang, S., & Wei, C. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122177 · Cited by 25
Eliciting Knowledge from Pretrained Language Models for Prototypical Prompt Verbalizer
Wei, Y., Mo, T., Jiang, Y., Li, W., & Zhao, W. (2022) · International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.05411 · Cited by 24
“While most of current works about prompt-tuning is in text classification tasks, some works have applied it to information extraction tasks [Cui et al., 2021; Han et al., 2021; Si et al., 2021] and text generation tasks [Li and Liang, 2021].”
Self-citationDual Prompt Tuning based Contrastive Learning for Hierarchical Text Classification
Xiong, S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Li, M.-X., He, Z.-J., Li, X.-L., & Song, S.-Y. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.723 · Cited by 24
“Prompt Tuning (Schick and Schütze, 2021; Liu et al., 2023a) (Shin et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2021a; Han et al., 2022) directly concatenate explicit discrete tokens with the original text and maintain them unchanged throughout entire training process, which do not introduce any parameters.”
BackgroundPrompt Tuning with Contradictory Intentions for Sarcasm Recognition
Liu, Y., Zhang, R., Fan, Y., Guo, J., & Cheng, X. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.25 · Cited by 13
“Recently, a series of studies propose to use prompt tuning (Han et al., 2021; Schick and Schütze, 2021a; Chen et al., 2022b) to bridge the gap between pre-training and fine-tuning.”
BackgroundPromptCoT: Align Prompt Distribution via Adapted Chain-of-Thought
Yao, J., Liu, Y., Dong, Z., Guo, M., Hu, H., Keutzer, K., Du, L., Zhou, D., & Zhang, S. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00671 · Cited by 12
“[11] introduces a more efficient method to construct prompts with several sub-prompts that employs prompt tuning with rules without searching.”
MethodPrompt Tuning on Graph-Augmented Low-Resource Text Classification
Wen, Z., & Fang, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3440068 · Cited by 20
“The strength of prompting has been validated in a wide range of NLP applications, including text classification[37],[38],[39],[40],[41],machinetranslation[42] andrelationextraction[43],[44].”
Bi-Directional Iterative Prompt-Tuning for Event Argument Extraction
Dai, L., Wang, B., Xiang, W., & Mo, Y. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.15843 · Cited by 23
“…makes better use of prior knowledge contained in pretrained language models, this new paradigm is beginning to become popular in NLP tasks and has achieved promising performance (Seoh et al., 2021; Han et al., 2021; Cui et al., 2021; Hou et al., 2022; Hu et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2022).”
BackgroundQi, X., Yang, B. Y., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Du, K. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.115266 · Cited by 17
FlexiReg: Flexible Urban Region Representation Learning
Sun, F., Chang, Y.-C., Tanin, E., Karunasekera, S., & Qi, J.-Z. (2025) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3711896.3736965 · Cited by 22
“The other baseline models, which use human mobility data, are typically faster in embedding learning 00, as human mobility data provides critical insights into regional interactions and the functional relationships between regions, enabling the model to converge quickly.”
Boosting Speech Recognition Robustness to Modality-Distortion with Contrast-Augmented Prompts
Fu, D.-J., Cheng, X.-Z., Yang, X.-D., Wang, H., Zhao, Z., & Jin, T. (2024) · ACM Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3664647.3681347 · Cited by 22
“Drawing inspiration from the notable success of prompt learning within the field of multi-task fine-tuning in natural language processing [11, 24, 51], we design tailored prompts for each modality-distortion conditions instead of training individual model with a myriad of parameters.”
iDNA-OpenPrompt: OpenPrompt learning model for identifying DNA methylation
Yu, X., Ren, J., Long, H., Zeng, R., Zhang, G., Bilal, A., & Cui, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2024.1377285 · Cited by 23
Few-Shot Fine-Grained Entity Typing with Automatic Label Interpretation and Instance Generation
Huang, J., Yu, M., & Han, J. (2022) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539443 · Cited by 19
“Inspired by these observations, prompt-based tuning has been widely developed for many text applications [4, 5, 19] and has generally surpassed vanilla fine-tuning in low-data regimes.”
BackgroundEvent Extraction With Dynamic Prefix Tuning and Relevance Retrieval
Huang, H., Liu, X., Shi, G., & Liu, Q. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3266495 · Cited by 21
“initializing with discrete prompts [36], [37], [38] and hybrid prompt tuning [39], [40], [41].”
BackgroundPrediction of Vulnerability Characteristics Based on Vulnerability Description and Prompt Learning
Li, X., Ren, X., Xue, Y., Xing, Z., & Sun, J. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) · doi:10.1109/saner56733.2023.00062 · Cited by 15
“Liu, Han, et al. [29], [30] use hybrid templates to achieve promising performance on multiple tasks.”
BackgroundGlobal Constraints with Prompting for Zero-Shot Event Argument Classification
Lin, Z.-Z., Zhang, H., & Song, Y.-Q. (2023) · Findings · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.04459 · Cited by 21
“People have been using leverage prompts and giant models to solve IE tasks like named entity recognition (Cui et al., 2021), semantic parsing (Shin et al., 2021), and relations extraction (Chen et al., 2022; Han et al., 2021) in a zero-shot or few-shot way.”
MethodDecorate the Examples: A Simple Method of Prompt Design for Biomedical Relation Extraction
Yeh, H.-S., Lavergne, T., & Zweigenbaum, P. (2022) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.10360 · Cited by 21
“(Label Words) is inhibitor of Following the simple template proposed by (Han et al., 2021), we reformulate each example by appending to it a sentence containing its two entities, with masked tokens between them.”
BackgroundMethodPrompt-based Zero-shot Relation Extraction with Semantic Knowledge Augmentation
Gong, J., & Eldardiry, H. (2021) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/2yxn5oemh6ks · Cited by 21
“However, most of the studies focus on supervised or few-shot learning on text classification [12, 16, 18, 20], event detection [30], relation classification [6, 18] and name entity recognition [21, 29, 34].”
BackgroundExplaining Data Patterns in Natural Language with Language Models
Singh, C., Morris, J. X., Aneja, J., Rush, A. M., & Gao, J. (2023) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.3 · Cited by 17
“…emerged (Li and Liang, 2021; Liu et al., 2021b) to improve the process of prompting, with methods such as prefix-tuning (Li and Liang, 2021), P-tuning (Liu et al., 2021b), prompt-tuning with rules (Han et al., 2021), knowledgeable prompt tuning (Hu et al., 2021) and many more (Liu et al., 2021a).”
MethodPromptGen: Automatically Generate Prompts using Generative Models
Zhang, Y., Fei, H., Li, D., & Li, P. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.3 · Cited by 16
“, 2021), text classification (Gao et al., 2021; Han et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Chai et al., 2020), natural language inference (Shin et al.”
BackgroundMethodLeveraging Large Vision-Language Model as User Intent-aware Encoder for Composed Image Retrieval
Sun, Z.-L., Jing, D., Yang, G., Fei, N., & Lu, Z.-W. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.11087 · Cited by 20
“Prompt tunings (Han et al. 2022; Jin et al. 2021; Zang et al. 2022) is an efficient, low-cost way of adapting a pre-trained foundation model to new downstream tasks.”
G-Prompt: Graphon-based Prompt Tuning for graph classification
Duan, Y., Liu, J., Chen, S., Chen, L., & Wu, J. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103639 · Cited by 18
APT-Pipe: A Prompt-Tuning Tool for Social Data Annotation using ChatGPT
Zhu, Y., Yin, Z., Gareth Tyson, A., Haq, E.-U., Lee, L., & Hui, P. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645642 · Cited by 13
Zhang, Y., Jiang, M., Meng, Y., Zhang, Y., & Han, J. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.780 · Cited by 21
“Later, task-specific prompts are used to guide PLM fine-tuning and perform well in a low-resource setting for several tasks, such as text classification (Han et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2022), relation extraction (Chen et al., 2022), and entity typing (Ding et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2022).”
MethodReviewing Labels: Label Graph Network with Top-k Prediction Set for Relation Extraction
Li, B., Ye, W., Zhang, J.-L., & Zhang, S.-K. (2022) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.14270 · Cited by 20
“PTR (Han et al. 2021) and KnowPrompt (Chen et al. 2022) use different prompt and answer word engineering for RE.”
MethodZhao, H., He, R., Xiao, M., & Xu, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.357 · Cited by 7
“Depending on resource scenarios, it can be mainly divided into two kinds of studies: full prompt tuning (FPT) and parameter-efficient ones (PEPT).”
BackgroundMethodEnhance Multi-Domain Sentiment Analysis of Review Texts Through Prompting Strategies
Wang, Y., & Luo, Z. (2023) · International Conference on High Performance Big Data and Intelligent Systems (HPBD&IS) · doi:10.1109/hdis60872.2023.10499502 · Cited by 12
“Other methods include prompt tuning [22-24], where prompts are fine-tuned on a specific task, and prompt programming [25], where prompts are generated using a programming language.”
MethodGRASP: Guiding model with RelAtional Semantics using Prompt for Dialogue Relation ExtractionPreprint
Son, J., Kim, J., Lim, J., & Lim, H. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.12494 · Cited by 9
“Moreover, PTR (Han et al., 2021) and KnowPrompt (Chen et al., 2021) are the prompt-based fine-tuning baseline models.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKECP: Knowledge Enhanced Contrastive Prompting for Few-shot Extractive Question Answering
Wang, J., Wang, C.-Y., Qiu, M., Shi, Q., Wang, H.-B., Huang, J., & Gao, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.03071 · Cited by 19
“, 2021a), PTR (Han et al., 2021), and many other related works (Li and Liang, 2021b; Qin and Eisner, 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialPack Together: Entity and Relation Extraction with Levitated Marker
Ye, D.-M., Lin, Y.-K., & Sun, M. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.06067 · Cited by 19
“More-over, to build the connection between entity type and relation type, we add an auxiliary loss for predicting the type of object entity (Zhou and Chen, 2021; Han et al., 2021).”
Self-citationThe Life Cycle of Knowledge in Big Language Models: A Survey
Cao, B., Lin, H., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2024) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-023-1416-x · Cited by 18
“, 2020b; Qin and Eisner, 2021), compositing (Han et al., 2021), or decoupling (Ozturkler et al.”
BackgroundSelf-citationKnowledge Graph-Based In-Context Learning for Advanced Fault Diagnosis in Sensor Networks
Xie, X., Wang, J., Han, Y., & Li, W. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24248086 · Cited by 18
Hybrid Prompt Learning for Generating Justifications of Security Risks in Automation Rules
Breve, B., Cimino, G., & Deufemia, V. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3675401 · Cited by 20
“…prompt learning uses soft prompts , which are embedded in a continuous space and fine-tuned using training samples [21], and (3) hybrid prompt learning combines both hard and soft prompts to enable pre-trained LM to perform tasks by inserting tunable embeddings into hard prompts [20, 25, 27].”
GPT-4 Performance for Neurologic Localization
Lee, J.-H., Choi, E., McDougal, R. A., & Lytton, W. W. (2024) · Neurology Clinical Practice · doi:10.1212/cpj.0000000000200293 · Cited by 21
Prompt Consistency for Multi-Label Textual Emotion Detection
Zhou, Y., Kang, X., & Ren, F. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2023.3254883 · Cited by 23
“Composition is more suitable for composable tasks such as relation extraction [38].”
BackgroundEfficient Federated Prompt Tuning for Black-box Large Pre-trained Models
Lin, Z.-H., Sun, Y., Shi, Y.-F., Wang, X., Huang, L.-F., Shen, L., & Tao, D.-C. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.03123 · Cited by 18
“…divided into two classes: discrete prompts (Gao et al., 2020; Shin et al., 2020; Ben-David et al., 2022) which is a sequence of discrete tokens and continuous prompts (Zhong et al., 2021; Han et al., 2022; Qin & Eisner, 2021) which is a sequence of continuous vectors followed by input text vectors.”
Zhang, H., Li, D., Li, Y.-R., Shang, C., Shi, C., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.06058 · Cited by 18
Multilingual Relation Classification via Efficient and Effective Prompting
Chen, Y., Harbecke, D., & Hennig, L. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13838 · Cited by 18
“We follow Chen et al. (2022) and Han et al. (2021), and evaluate on 8, 16 and 32 shots.”
MethodInfluentialTowards Realistic Low-resource Relation Extraction: A Benchmark with Empirical Baseline Study
Xu, X., Chen, X., Zhang, N., Xie, X., Chen, X., & Chen, H.-J. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.10678 · Cited by 18
“More recently, a new methodology named prompt learning has made waves in the community by demonstrating astounding few-shot capabilities on LRE (Han et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022d).”
MethodResultInfluentialPlum: Prompt Learning using Metaheuristics
Pan, R., Xing, S., Diao, S., Sun, W., Liu, X., Shum, K., Zhang, J., Pi, R., & Zhang, T. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.129 · Cited by 14
“…Gao et al., 2021; Ben-David et al., 2022; Su et al., 2022a; Diao et al., 2022; Datta et al., 2023; Pan et al., 2024) and continuous prompts (Hambardzumyan et al., 2021; Zhong et al., 2021; Han et al., 2021; Li and Liang, 2021; Qin and Eisner, 2021; Liu et al., 2021a) based on the format of prompts.”
Text-free inductive knowledge graph embedding via meta graph-based prompt learning
Yi, M., Xie, Z., Zhou, G., Song, W., & Huang, J. X. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104460 · Cited by 17
Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Continual Few-Shot Relation Extractors
Ma, S., Han, J., Liang, Y., & Cheng, B. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.15713 · Cited by 17
“3) hybrid prompt (Han et al., 2022) combines untunable hard prompts and tuneable soft prompts, allowing the models to easily learn suitable templates with small manual intervention.”
BackgroundLLMs as Meta-Reviewers' Assistants: A Case StudyPreprint
Hossain, E., Sinha, S. K., Bansal, N., Knipper, R. A., Sarkar, S., Salvador, J., Mahajan, Y., Guttikonda, S., Akter, M., Hassan, M. M., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.15589 · Cited by 17
“However, LLMs are quite sensitive to prompts that are fed to them (Loya et al., 2023; Sclar et al., 2023), and therefore, designing appropriate prompts with the right amount of detail has become more important than ever (Liu et al., 2023a; Han et al., 2022).”
PTCAS: Prompt tuning with continuous answer search for relation extraction
Chen, Y., Shi, B., & Xu, K. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.120060 · Cited by 16
Assessing the Effectiveness of Vulnerability Detection via Prompt Tuning: An Empirical Study
Lu, G., Ju, X., Chen, X., Yang, S., Chen, L., & Shen, H. (2023) · Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC) · doi:10.1109/apsec60848.2023.00052 · Cited by 12
Ang, C. Y. S., Chiew, Y. S., Wang, X., Ooi, E. H., Cove, M. E., Chen, Y., Zhou, C., & Chase, J. G. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108323 · Cited by 15
Lifelong iris presentation attack detection without forgetting
Zhou, Z.-Y., Liu, Y.-N., Zhu, X.-D., Liu, S., Zhang, S., Li, Y.-F., & Liu, Z. (2023) · Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-023-05445-3 · Cited by 16
“In a word, PT can encode task-specific knowledge [19] 1 3 Lifelong iris presentation attack detection without… and make better use of frozen pre-trained models [20].”
Self-citationMulti-modal soft prompt-tuning for Chinese Clickbait Detection
Wang, Y., Zhu, Y. Q., Li, Y., Wei, L., Yuan, Y., & Qiang, J. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128829 · Cited by 17
AMPLE: Emotion-Aware Multimodal Fusion Prompt Learning for Fake News Detection
Xu, X., Li, X., Wang, T., & Jiang, Y. (2024) · Conference on Multimedia Modeling · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.15591 · Cited by 15
“Additionally, common methods [7,14,26] in multimodal FND, such as cascading, addition, and specially designed neural networks, primarily facilitate the fusion of surface features but may lose deeper multimodal information.”
MethodPipeline Chain-of-Thought: A Prompt Method for Large Language Model Relation Extraction
Zhao, H., Yilahun, H., & Hamdulla, A. (2023) · International Conference on Asian Language Processing · doi:10.1109/ialp61005.2023.10337264 · Cited by 19
VPA: Fully Test-Time Visual Prompt Adaptation
Sun, J., Ibrahim, M., Hall, M. A., Evtimov, I., Mao, Z. M., Ferrer, C. C., & Hazırbaş, C. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3581783.3611835 · Cited by 10
“Prompt tuning has been advanced for different goals in language models [19, 20, 38], while visual prompting has been explored for zero-shot recognition tasks [66, 67].”
BackgroundZero-Shot Cross-Lingual Event Argument Extraction with Language-Oriented Prefix-Tuning
Cao, P., Jin, Z., Chen, Y., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26482 · Cited by 8
Learning Combinatorial Prompts for Universal Controllable Image Captioning
Wang, Z., Xiao, J., Zhuang, Y., Gao, F., Shao, J., & Chen, L. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-024-02179-4 · Cited by 13
“To further equip the models with similar compositional ability, recent works also combine different prompts to accomplish multi-task or multi-attribute controls (Liu et al., 2021; Han et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2022).”
Domain-Enhanced Prompt Learning for Chinese Implicit Hate Speech Detection
Zhang, Y., Zhong, T., Yi, T., & Li, H. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3351804 · Cited by 13
“The construction of templates is a key factor that affects the performance of prompt learning methods [34], [35].”
BackgroundFPC: Fine-tuning with Prompt Curriculum for Relation Extraction
Yang, S., & Song, D. (2022) · AACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.aacl-main.78 · Cited by 15
“PTR (Han et al., 2021) manually designs some essential sub-prompts and composes them into final prompts by applying logic rules.”
MethodInfluentialJoPA: Explaining Large Language Model’s Generation via Joint Prompt Attribution
Chang, Y., Cao, B., Wang, Y., Chen, J., & Lin, L. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1074 · Cited by 12
“While there are extensive works devoted to explaining language models in the context of text classification tasks (Shi et al., 2022; Han et al., 2021; Shi et al., 2023), relatively few attempts (Zhao and Shan, 2024; Vafa et al., 2021) are proposed to investigate the importance of prompt texts on…”
Dual Prompt-Based Few-Shot Learning for Automated Vulnerability Patch Localization
Zhang, J., Hu, X., Bao, L., Xia, X., & Li, S. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) · doi:10.1109/saner60148.2024.00102 · Cited by 6
“The soft prompt [31], [33], [34] is different from the hard prompt in that the tokens of the prompt are represented as continuous vectors instead of fixed discrete words.”
BackgroundA Composable Generative Framework Based on Prompt Learning for Various Information Extraction Tasks
Kan, Z., Feng, L., Yin, Z., Qiao, L., Qiu, X., & Li, D. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2023.3278977 · Cited by 17
“proposed a text classification framework named “PTR” [11],”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLi, Z., Jin, J., Long, W., & Wei, L. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107260 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, X., Zhao, W., Ding, N., Liu, Z., & Sun, M.
- Affiliations
- Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Zhiyuan
- Sun, Maosong
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 182-192
- ISSN
- 2666-6510 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2105.11259
- OpenAlex
- W4309811444
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 14
- FWCI
- 35.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Locations
- AI Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62236004)
- Tsinghua University
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020AAA0106500)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- prompt tuning, text classification, pre-trained language models, relation classification, entity typing, intent classification, prior knowledge encoding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review