CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 7Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Assessing Relational Quantum Mechanics

Open access
Muciño, R., Okon, E., Sudarsky, D.·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2105.13338arXiv 2105.13338
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) is an interpretation of quantum theory based on the idea of abolishing the notion of absolute states of systems, in favor of states of systems relative to other systems. Such a move is claimed to solve the conceptual problems of standard quantum mechanics. Moreover, RQM has been argued to account for all quantum correlations without invoking non-local effects and, in spite of embracing a fully relational stance, to successfully explain how different observers exchange information. In this work, we carry out a thorough assessment of RQM and its purported achievements. We find that it fails to address the conceptual problems of standard quantum mechanics--related to the lack of clarity in its ontology and the rules that govern its behavior--and that it leads to serious conceptual problems of its own. We also uncover as unwarranted the claims that RQM can correctly explain information exchange among observers, and that it accommodates all quantum correlations without invoking non-local influences. We conclude that RQM is unsuccessful in its attempt to provide a satisfactory understanding of the quantum world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2105.13338

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pure unitary quantum mechanics does not suffice to determine which variable in particular should take on definite values during an interaction that leads to a quantum event.

    “So pure unitary quantum mechanics does not suffice to determine which variable in particular should take on definite values during an interaction that leads to a quantum event.”

    From Information is Physical: Cross-Perspective Links in Relational Quantum Mechanics (2023) · cites this paper as Muciño, Okon, and Sudarsky (2021)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bell, J. (1971). Introduction to the hidden-variable question. In d'Espagnat, B., editor, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, pages 171-181. Proceedings of the International School of Physics 'Enrico Fermi', course IL, New York: Academic.
  2. Bell, J. (1976). The theory of local beables. Epistemological Letters.
  3. Bell, J. (1990a). Against measurement. In Miller, A. I., editor, Sixty-two Years of Uncertainty. Plenum Press.
  4. Bell, J. (1990b). La nouvelle cuisine. In Between Science and Technology. Elsevier Science Publishers.
  5. Di Biagio, A. and Rovelli, C. (2020). Stable facts, relative facts. arXiv:2006.15543. · arXiv
  6. Dorato, M. (2016). Rovelli's relational quantum mechanics, monism and quantum becoming. In Marmodoro, A. and Yates, A., editors, The Metaphysics of Relations, pages 290-324. Oxford University Press.
  7. Maudlin, T. (2004). Truth and Paradox: Solving the Riddles. Oxford University Press.
  8. Norsen, T. (2017). Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Springer.
  9. Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational Quantum Mechanics. Int. J. Theo. Phys., 35(8):1637- 1678.
  10. Rovelli, C. (1997a). Halfway through the woods. In Earman, J. and Norton, J. D., editors, The Cosmos of Science. University of Pittsburgh Press.
  11. Rovelli, C. (1997b). Relational Quantum Mechanics. arXiv:quant-ph/9609002v2. · arXiv
  12. Rovelli, C. (2018). 'Space is blue and birds fly through it'. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2123).
  13. Schlosshauer, M. (2008). Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Springer.
  14. Sorkin, R. D. (1993). Impossible measurements on quantum fields. In Hu, B. and Jacobson, T. A., editors, Directions in General Relativity, pages 293-305. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Yablo, S. (1985). Truth and reflection. Journal of Philosophical Logic volume, 14:297- 349.
  16. Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical - revisited. arXiv:quant-ph/0306072. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muciño, R., Okon, E., & Sudarsky, D.
Affiliations
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2105.13338
arXiv
2105.13338
OpenAlex
W3163976773
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Silicon Valley Community Foundation
  • Fetzer Institute
  • Foundational Questions Institute (FQXI-MGA-1920)
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (140630)
  • Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (140630, IG-100120)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
relational quantum mechanics, interpretation of quantum mechanics, quantum ontology, quantum correlations, nonlocality, relational state, measurement problem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review