CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 10Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

D2C: Diffusion-Denoising Models for Few-shot Conditional Generation

Open access
Sinha, Abhishek, Song, Jiaming, Meng, Chenlin, Ermon, Stefano·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2106.06819arXiv 2106.06819
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Conditional generative models of high-dimensional images have many applications, but supervision signals from conditions to images can be expensive to acquire. This paper describes Diffusion-Decoding models with Contrastive representations (D2C), a paradigm for training unconditional variational autoencoders (VAEs) for few-shot conditional image generation. D2C uses a learned diffusion-based prior over the latent representations to improve generation and contrastive self-supervised learning to improve representation quality. D2C can adapt to novel generation tasks conditioned on labels or manipulation constraints, by learning from as few as 100 labeled examples. On conditional generation from new labels, D2C achieves superior performance over state-of-the-art VAEs and diffusion models. On conditional image manipulation, D2C generations are two orders of magnitude faster to produce over StyleGAN2 ones and are preferred by 50% - 60% of the human evaluators in a double-blind study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2106.06819

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approaches that separately learn an encoding/decoding model with a score-based prior focus on highly structured images such as human faces.

    “and the latter focus on highly structured images such as human faces.”

    From High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

    Section 4 (p. 4) describes D2C as an encoder/decoder-based model with diffusion over latent representations, and Section 7 (p. 7) includes several face datasets. But Section 7 also evaluates CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and fMoW, so the claim that the approach focuses on highly structured images such as faces is too narrow. Appendix A.4 (p. 18) also says the model components can be optimized jointly or separately, rather than requiring separate learning. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. [1][1] Alexander A Alemi, Ben Poole, Ian Fischer, Joshua V Dillon, Rif A Saurous, and Kevin Murphy. Fixing a broken ELBO. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00464 , November 2017. - · arXiv
  2. [2][2] Jyoti Aneja, Harsh Agrawal, Dhruv Batra, and Alexander Schwing. Sequential latent spaces for modeling the intention during diverse image captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 4261-4270, 2019. -
  3. [3][3] Jyoti Aneja, Alexander Schwing, Jan Kautz, and Arash Vahdat. NCP-VAE: Variational autoencoders with noise contrastive priors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02917 , October 2020. - · arXiv
  4. [4][4] Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. Wasserstein GAN. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07875 , January 2017. - · arXiv
  5. [5][5] Muhammad Asim, Ali Ahmed, and Paul Hand. Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.11672 , May 2019. - · arXiv
  6. [6][6] Sergey Bartunov and Dmitry Vetrov. Few-shot generative modelling with generative matching networks. In Amos Storkey and Fernando Perez-Cruz, editors, Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , volume 84 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 670-678. PMLR, 2018. -
  7. [7][7] David Bau, Jun-Yan Zhu, Jonas Wulff, William Peebles, Hendrik Strobelt, Bolei Zhou, and Antonio Torralba. Seeing what a gan cannot generate. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 4502-4511, 2019. -
  8. [8][8] Andrew Brock, Jeff Donahue, and Karen Simonyan. Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.11096 , September 2018. - · arXiv
  9. [9][9] Andrew Brock, Theodore Lim, James M Ritchie, and Nick Weston. Neural photo editing with introspective adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07093 , 2016. - · arXiv
  10. [10][10] Tom B Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language models are Few-Shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165 , May 2020. - · arXiv
  11. [11][11] Emmanuel J Candes, Justin K Romberg, and Terence Tao. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences , 59(8):1207-1223, 2006. -
  12. [14][14] Ting Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, and Geoffrey Hinton. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05709 , February 2020. - · arXiv
  13. [15][15] Xinlei Chen, Haoqi Fan, Ross Girshick, and Kaiming He. Improved baselines with momentum contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04297 , March 2020. - · arXiv
  14. [16][16] Xinlei Chen and Kaiming He. Exploring simple siamese representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.10566 , November 2020. - · arXiv
  15. [17][17] Xinlei Chen, Saining Xie, and Kaiming He. An empirical study of training Self-Supervised vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02057 , April 2021. - · arXiv
  16. [18][18] Rewon Child. Very deep vaes generalize autoregressive models and can outperform them on images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.10650 , 2020. - · arXiv
  17. [19][19] Gordon Christie, Neil Fendley, James Wilson, and Ryan Mukherjee. Functional map of the world. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6172-6180, 2018. -
  18. [20][20] Louis Clouâtre and Marc Demers. Figr: Few-shot image generation with reptile. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.02199 , 2019. - · arXiv
  19. [21][21] Bin Dai and David Wipf. Diagnosing and enhancing VAE models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.05789 , March 2019. - · arXiv
  20. [22][22] Giannis Daras, Joseph Dean, Ajil Jalal, and Alexandros G Dimakis. Intermediate layer optimization for inverse problems using deep generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.07364 , February 2021. - · arXiv
  21. [24][24] Prafulla Dhariwal, Heewoo Jun, Christine Payne, Jong Wook Kim, Alec Radford, and Ilya Sutskever. Jukebox: A generative model for music. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00341 , 2020. - · arXiv
  22. [25][25] Prafulla Dhariwal and Alex Nichol. Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.05233 , May 2021. - · arXiv
  23. [26][26] L Dinh, D Krueger, and Y Bengio. NICE: Non-linear independent components estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.8516 , 2014. - · arXiv
  24. [27][27] Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio. Density estimation using real NVP. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.08803 , May 2016. - · arXiv
  25. [28][28] Jeff Donahue, Philipp Krähenbühl, and Trevor Darrell. Adversarial feature learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.09782 , May 2016. - · arXiv
  26. [29][29] Yilun Du and Igor Mordatch. Implicit generation and generalization in Energy-Based models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.08689 , March 2019. - · arXiv
  27. [30][30] Vincent Dumoulin, Ishmael Belghazi, Ben Poole, Olivier Mastropietro, Alex Lamb, Martin Arjovsky, and Aaron Courville. Adversarially learned inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.00704 , June 2016. - · arXiv
  28. [31][31] Charles Elkan and Keith Noto. Learning classifiers from only positive and unlabeled data. In 14th ACM SIGKDD , pages 213-220, 2008. -
  29. [32][32] Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In Z Ghahramani, M Welling, C Cortes, N D Lawrence, and K Q Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 , pages 2672-2680. Curran Associates, Inc., 2014. -
  30. [33][33] Jean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec, Pierre H Richemond, Elena Buchatskaya, Carl Doersch, Bernardo Avila Pires, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Bilal Piot, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Rémi Munos, and Michal Valko. Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to Self-Supervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.07733 , June 2020. - · arXiv
  31. [34][34] Aditya Grover, Aaron Zweig, and Stefano Ermon. Graphite: Iterative generative modeling of graphs. In International conference on machine learning , pages 2434-2444. PMLR, 2019. -
  32. [35][35] Kaiming He, Haoqi Fan, Yuxin Wu, Saining Xie, and Ross Girshick. Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.05722 , November 2019. - · arXiv
  33. [36][36] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03385 , December 2015. - · arXiv
  34. [37][37] Olivier Henaff. Data-efficient image recognition with contrastive predictive coding. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 4182-4192. PMLR, 2020. -
  35. [38][38] Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. GANs trained by a two Time-Scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.08500 , June 2017. - · arXiv
  36. [39][39] Geoffrey E Hinton. Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural computation , 14(8):1771-1800, August 2002. -
  37. [40][40] Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11239 , June 2020. - · arXiv
  38. [41][41] Matthew D Hoffman and Matthew J Johnson. Elbo surgery: yet another way to carve up the variational evidence lower bound. In Workshop in Advances in Approximate Bayesian Inference, NIPS , volume 1, page 2. approximateinference.org, 2016. -
  39. [42][42] Drew A Hudson and C Lawrence Zitnick. Generative adversarial transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01209 , 2021. - · arXiv
  40. [43][43] Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In CVPR , 2017. -
  41. [44][44] Zahra Kadkhodaie and Eero P Simoncelli. Solving linear inverse problems using the prior implicit in a denoiser. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.13640 , July 2020. - · arXiv
  42. [45][45] Tero Karras, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine, and Jaakko Lehtinen. Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10196 , October 2017. - · arXiv
  43. [46][46] Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. A Style-Based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04948 , December 2018. - · arXiv
  44. [47][47] Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila. Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 8110-8119, 2020. -
  45. [48][48] Diederik P Kingma, Tim Salimans, Rafal Jozefowicz, Xi Chen, Ilya Sutskever, and Max Welling. Improved variational inference with inverse autoregressive flow. In D D Lee, MSugiyama, U V Luxburg, I Guyon, and R Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 , pages 4743-4751. Curran Associates, Inc., 2016. -
  46. [49][49] Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-Encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114v10 , December 2013. - · arXiv
  47. [51][51] Anders Boesen Lindbo Larsen, Søren Kaae Sønderby, Hugo Larochelle, and Ole Winther. Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric. In International conference on machine learning , pages 1558-1566. PMLR, 2016. -
  48. [52][52] C Li, H Liu, C Chen, Y Pu, L Chen, and others. Alice: Towards understanding adversarial learning for joint distribution matching. Advances in neural information processing systems , 2017. -
  49. [53][53] Chunyuan Li, Xiang Gao, Yuan Li, Baolin Peng, Xiujun Li, Yizhe Zhang, and Jianfeng Gao. Optimus: Organizing sentences via pre-trained modeling of a latent space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04092 , 2020. - · arXiv
  50. [54][54] Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European conference on computer vision , pages 740-755. Springer, 2014. -
  51. [55][55] Ziwei Liu, Ping Luo, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang. Deep learning face attributes in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages 3730-3738, 2015. -
  52. [56][56] Alireza Makhzani, Jonathon Shlens, Navdeep Jaitly, Ian Goodfellow, and Brendan Frey. Adversarial autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05644 , 2015. - · arXiv
  53. [57][57] Elman Mansimov, Emilio Parisotto, Jimmy Lei Ba, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Generating images from captions with attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.02793 , 2015. - · arXiv
  54. [58][58] Mehdi Mirza and Simon Osindero. Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784 , November 2014. - · arXiv
  55. [59][59] Gautam Mittal, Jesse Engel, Curtis Hawthorne, and Ian Simon. Symbolic music generation with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.16091 , March 2021. - · arXiv
  56. [60][60] Takeru Miyato, Toshiki Kataoka, Masanori Koyama, and Yuichi Yoshida. Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05957 , February 2018. - · arXiv
  57. [61][61] Shakir Mohamed and Balaji Lakshminarayanan. Learning in implicit generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.03483 , October 2016. - · arXiv
  58. [63][63] Anh Nguyen, Jeff Clune, Yoshua Bengio, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Jason Yosinski. Plug & play generative networks: Conditional iterative generation of images in latent space. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 4467-4477, 2017. -
  59. [64][64] Chenhao Niu, Yang Song, Jiaming Song, Shengjia Zhao, Aditya Grover, and Stefano Ermon. Permutation invariant graph generation via score-based generative modeling. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 4474-4484. PMLR, 2020. -
  60. [65][65] Mehdi Noroozi and Paolo Favaro. Unsupervised learning of visual representations by solving jigsaw puzzles. In European conference on computer vision , pages 69-84. Springer, 2016. -
  61. [66][66] Taesung Park, Jun-Yan Zhu, Oliver Wang, Jingwan Lu, Eli Shechtman, Alexei A Efros, and Richard Zhang. Swapping autoencoder for deep image manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00653 , July 2020. - · arXiv
  62. [67][67] Or Patashnik, Zongze Wu, Eli Shechtman, Daniel Cohen-Or, and Dani Lischinski. StyleCLIP: Text-Driven manipulation of StyleGAN imagery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.17249 , March 2021. - · arXiv
  63. [68][68] Wei Ping, Kainan Peng, Kexin Zhao, and Zhao Song. Waveflow: A compact flow-based model for raw audio. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 7706-7716. PMLR, 2020. -
  64. [69][69] Tiziano Portenier, Qiyang Hu, Attila Szabó, Siavash Arjomand Bigdeli, Paolo Favaro, and Matthias Zwicker. Faceshop: Deep sketch-based face image editing. ACM Transactions on Graphics , 37(4), 2018. -
  65. [70][70] Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00020 , February 2021. - · arXiv
  66. [71][71] Aditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Mark Chen, and Ilya Sutskever. Zero-Shot Text-to-Image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12092 , February 2021. - · arXiv
  67. [72][72] Ali Razavi, Aaron van den Oord, and Oriol Vinyals. Generating diverse high-fidelity images with vq-vae-2. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00446 , 2019. - · arXiv
  68. [73][73] Scott Reed, Zeynep Akata, Xinchen Yan, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Bernt Schiele, and Honglak Lee. Generative adversarial text to image synthesis. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 1060-1069. PMLR, 2016. -
  69. [74][74] Danilo Jimenez Rezende and Shakir Mohamed. Variational inference with normalizing flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.05770 , May 2015. - · arXiv
  70. [75][75] Gareth O Roberts and Jeffrey S Rosenthal. Optimal scaling of discrete approximations to langevin diffusions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , 60(1):255-268, 1998. -
  71. [76][76] Mihaela Rosca, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, and Shakir Mohamed. Distribution matching in variational inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06847 , February 2018. - · arXiv
  72. [77][77] Yujun Shen, Jinjin Gu, Xiaoou Tang, and Bolei Zhou. Interpreting the latent space of gans for semantic face editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 9243-9252, 2020. -
  73. [78][78] Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric A Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Ganguli. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.03585 , March 2015. - · arXiv
  74. [79][79] Jiaming Song and Stefano Ermon. Multi-label contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09852 , 2020. - · arXiv
  75. [80][80] Jiaming Song, Pratyusha Kalluri, Aditya Grover, Shengjia Zhao, and Stefano Ermon. Learning controllable fair representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04218 , December 2018. - · arXiv
  76. [81][81] Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502 , 2020. - · arXiv
  77. [82][82] Yang Song and Stefano Ermon. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.05600 , July 2019. - · arXiv
  78. [84][84] Hiroshi Takahashi, Tomoharu Iwata, Yuki Yamanaka, Masanori Yamada, and Satoshi Yagi. Variational autoencoder with implicit optimal priors. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 33(01):5066-5073, July 2019. -
  79. [85][85] Ilya Tolstikhin, Olivier Bousquet, Sylvain Gelly, and Bernhard Schoelkopf. Wasserstein Auto-Encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.01558 , November 2017. - · arXiv
  80. [86][86] Jakub M Tomczak and Max Welling. Improving variational auto-encoders using householder flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09630 , 2016. - · arXiv
  81. [87][87] Jakub M Tomczak and Max Welling. VAE with a VampPrior. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07120 , May 2017. - · arXiv
  82. [88][88] Arash Vahdat and Jan Kautz. NVAE: A deep hierarchical variational autoencoder. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.03898 , July 2020. - · arXiv
  83. [89][89] Aaron van den Oord, Sander Dieleman, Heiga Zen, Karen Simonyan, Oriol Vinyals, Alex Graves, Nal Kalchbrenner, Andrew Senior, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. WaveNet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499 , September 2016. - · arXiv
  84. [90][90] Aaron van den Oord, Nal Kalchbrenner, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Pixel recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.06759 , January 2016. - · arXiv
  85. [91][91] Aaron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748 , July 2018. - · arXiv
  86. [92][92] Aaron van den Oord, Oriol Vinyals, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Neural discrete representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00937 , November 2017. - · arXiv
  87. [93][93] Ting-Chun Wang, Ming-Yu Liu, Jun-Yan Zhu, Andrew Tao, Jan Kautz, and Bryan Catanzaro. High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional gans. In CVPR , 2018. -
  88. [95][95] Zhe Xie, Chengxuan Liu, Yichi Zhang, Hongtao Lu, Dong Wang, and Yue Ding. Adversarial and contrastive variational autoencoder for sequential recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.10693 , March 2021. - · arXiv
  89. [96][96] Yinghao Xu, Yujun Shen, Jiapeng Zhu, Ceyuan Yang, and Bolei Zhou. Generative hierarchical features from synthesizing images. arXiv e-prints , pages arXiv-2007, 2020. -
  90. [97][97] Jiaxuan You, Bowen Liu, Rex Ying, Vijay Pande, and Jure Leskovec. Graph convolutional policy network for Goal-Directed molecular graph generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.02473 , June 2018. - · arXiv
  91. [98][98] Lantao Yu, Weinan Zhang, Jun Wang, and Yong Yu. Seqgan: Sequence generative adversarial nets with policy gradient. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume 31, 2017. -
  92. [99][99] Shengjia Zhao, Jiaming Song, and Stefano Ermon. InfoVAE: Information maximizing variational autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02262 , June 2017. - · arXiv
  93. [101][101] Shengjia Zhao, Jiaming Song, and Stefano Ermon. A lagrangian perspective on latent variable generative models. In Proc. 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence , 2018. -
  94. [102][102] Jiapeng Zhu, Yujun Shen, Deli Zhao, and Bolei Zhou. In-domain gan inversion for real image editing. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 592-608. Springer, 2020. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinha, A., Song, J., Meng, C., & Ermon, S.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2106.06819
arXiv
2106.06819
OpenAlex
W3170636531
Cited by
10
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1651565, 1522054, 1733686)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-19, FA9550, N00014-19-1-2145, N00014)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-19-1-0024)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
diffusion models, variational autoencoder, self-supervised contrastive learning, latent representations, generative models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review