Multi-task curriculum learning in a complex, visual, hard-exploration domain: Minecraft
Open accessAbstract
An important challenge in reinforcement learning is training agents that can solve a wide variety of tasks. If tasks depend on each other (e.g. needing to learn to walk before learning to run), curriculum learning can speed up learning by focusing on the next best task to learn. We explore curriculum learning in a complex, visual domain with many hard exploration challenges: Minecraft. We find that learning progress (defined as a change in success probability of a task) is a reliable measure of learnability for automatically constructing an effective curriculum. We introduce a learning-progress based curriculum and test it on a complex reinforcement learning problem (called "Simon Says") where an agent is instructed to obtain a desired goal item. Many of the required skills depend on each other. Experiments demonstrate that: (1) a within-episode exploration bonus for obtaining new items improves performance, (2) dynamically adjusting this bonus across training such that it only applies to items the agent cannot reliably obtain yet further increases performance, (3) the learning-progress based curriculum elegantly follows the learning curve of the agent, and (4) when the learning-progress based curriculum is combined with the dynamic exploration bonus it learns much more efficiently and obtains far higher performance than uniform baselines. These results suggest that combining intra-episode and across-training exploration bonuses with learning progress creates a promising method for automated curriculum generation, which may substantially increase our ability to train more capable, generally intelligent agents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous approaches to Minecraft resorted to using human expert data and domain-specific curricula.
“Owing to these obstacles, previous approaches resorted to using human expert data and domain-specific curricula20,21.”
From Mastering diverse control tasks through world models (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
The MineRL competition environment is an established standard in the literature.
“Although the MineRL competition environment19 is an established standard in the literature3,20, it provides a complex dictionary action space that requires additional set-up to connect agents.”
From Mastering diverse control tasks through world models (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
A similar but more complex version of this action space was used for curriculum learning in Minecraft in the literature.
“A similar but more complex version of this action space was used for curriculum learning in Minecraft in the literature20.”
From Mastering diverse control tasks through world models (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Classical RL and imitation learning approaches operate on primitive actions, which could be challenging for systematic exploration, interpretability, and generalization.
“Classical approaches employ reinforcement learning (RL) [6, 7] and imitation learning [8-10] that operate on primitive actions, which could be challenging for systematic exploration [11-15], interpretability [16-18], and generalization [19-21].”
From Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Kanitscheider, I., Huizinga, J., Farhi, D., Guss, W. H., Houghton, B., Sampedro, R., Zhokhov, P., Baker, B., Ecoffet, A., Tang, J., Klimov, O., & Clune, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2106.14876
- OpenAlex
- W3173930728
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- curriculum learning, multi-task learning, learning progress, exploration bonus, Minecraft, Simon Says, visual reinforcement learning, exploration efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review